Phosphorus Losses in Simulated Rainfall Runoff from Manured Soils of Alberta

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 730-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Callie A. Volf ◽  
Gerald R. Ontkean ◽  
D. Rodney Bennett ◽  
David S. Chanasyk ◽  
Jim J. Miller
Soil Research ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 109 ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Singer ◽  
PH Walker

The 20-100 mm portion of a yellow podzolic soil (Albaqualf) from the Ginninderra Experiment Station (A.C.T.) was used in a rainfall simulator and flume facility to elucidate the interactions between raindrop impact, overland water flow and straw cover as they affect soil erosion. A replicated factorial design compared soil loss in splash and runoff from 50 and 100 mm h-1 rainfall, the equivalent of 100 mm h-1 overland flow, and 50 and 100 mm h-1 rainfall plus the equivalent of 100 mm h-' overland flow, all at 0, 40 and 80% straw cover on a 9% slope. As rainfall intensity increased, soil loss in splash and runoff increased. Within cover levels, the effect of added overland flow was to decrease splash but to increase total soil loss. This is due to an interaction between raindrops and runoff which produces a powerful detaching and transporting mechanism within the flow known as rain-flow transportation. Airsplash is reduced, in part, because of the changes in splash characteristics which accompany changes in depths of runoff water. Rain-flow transportation accounted for at least 64% of soil transport in the experiment and airsplash accounted for no more than 25% of soil transport The effects of rainfall, overland flow and cover treatments, rather than being additive, were found to correlate with a natural log transform of the soil loss data.


2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Panuska ◽  
K. G. Karthikeyan ◽  
J. M. Norman

2015 ◽  
Vol 521-522 ◽  
pp. 191-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivas Sura ◽  
Dani Degenhardt ◽  
Allan J. Cessna ◽  
Francis J. Larney ◽  
Andrew F. Olson ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 514 ◽  
pp. 180-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoqiang Wang ◽  
Binbin Wu ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Hong Jiang ◽  
Zongxue Xu

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-241
Author(s):  
Z. Yuan ◽  
Y. Liao ◽  
M. Zheng ◽  
M. Zhuo ◽  
B. Huang ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 27-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheri L. Herron ◽  
Andrew N. Sharpley ◽  
Kristofor R. Brye ◽  
David M. Miller ◽  
Susan Watkins ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Hamizedra Sadeghi ◽  
Mahboobeh Kiani-Harchegani ◽  
Zeinab Hazbavi ◽  
Habibollah Younesi ◽  
Padideh Sadat Sadeghi ◽  
...  

<p>Nowadays soil erosion control using different amendments has grown up worldwide. However, the application of transformed materials like biochar has not been adequately studied. In the same vein, the application of biochars produced from waste materials that harm nature, and impose cost to managers and producers is a valuable approach for optimal utilization of the resources. Towards this, the performance of biochar produced from deleterious raw vinasse as the main by-product of sugarcane industries in controlling soil splash and interrill erosions on two marl and loess soils from Iran was investigated. The study was performed in 0.5 m×0.5 m plots in three replicates installed in the field with a slope steepness of 25% subjected to a simulated rainfall with an intensity of 50 mm h<sup>-1</sup> and 0.5 h duration. Analysis of the results obtained from the splash and interrill erosions during the rainfall-runoff process showed that biochar decreased soil loss compared to the control plot on Marl soil but to a small extent (p > 0.05). However, the plot treated with biochar on the loess soil revealed significant (p<0.05) reduction in soil loss in comparison with that of the control plot. That study clearly demonstrates the addition of biochar may promote stability and limit both runoff and soil erosion. However, such effects strongly depend on the type of soils.</p>


1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun L. Zhou ◽  
Steve J. Rowland ◽  
R. Fauzi ◽  
C. Mantoura ◽  
Mike C.G. Lane

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document