School Bond Referendum, Capital Expenditure, and Student Achievement

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Hong

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Hong

AbstractIn the United States, the reform of the financial system of capital expenditure is under consideration, as people believe the current system through local referenda contributes to inequality in student achievement across school districts. Several studies using a regression discontinuity design (RDD) find zero to modest positive effects of capital expenditure on student achievement; however, these studies identify only the effect of capital expenditure financed by a marginally passed bond with a vote share at the cutoff. In this paper I estimate the average effect of capital expenditure on student achievement by incorporating a latent factor model into the existing RDD framework, and comparing school districts that are similar in their underlying confounding variables, namely preferences for educational investment. The results show that, on average, capital expenditure financed by a passed bond does not have significant effect on student achievement.



2021 ◽  
pp. 155545892199317
Author(s):  
Sarah R. Nielsen ◽  
Amanda Taggart

When a struggling high school may be placed on turnaround status during a bid for a school bond, the district considers replacing a beloved principal with a record of low test scores with an unpopular principal whose record shows increased student achievement. The school board must decide whether to prioritize finances, community support, student achievement, or state-level demands. This case presents many difficult decisions schools and districts are required to make. Key factors discussed in the case include principal turnover, student academic achievement, teacher retention, school culture, and power.



Author(s):  
Theresa Luhm ◽  
Ellen Foley ◽  
Tom Corcoran




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document