scholarly journals Labor Tax Progressivity, Wage Determination, and the Relative Wage Effect

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Brunello ◽  
Daniela Sonedda

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Brunello ◽  
Maria Laura Parisi ◽  
Daniela Sonedda


1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 79-88
Author(s):  
Paul W. Grimes

Recent empirical analysis of state right-to-work legislation indicates that a negative wage effect may result as a consequence of banning union shop contracts. It has been previously shown that industrial unionism tends to improve the relative wage position of black workers. Thus, it is hypothesized that if state right-to-work laws weaken the economic power of unions to raise wages, black workers will experience a disproportionate decline in their relative wage position. Black workers in right-to-work states would therefore experience a reduction in their relative economic position unless a strong positive relative employment effect occurs in response to the decline in wages. Using a cross-sectional regression model this article examines the relative employment effect due to right-to-work legislation. The results indicate that black workers experience a statistically significant decline in their relative employment rate within right-to-work states. When this finding is coupled with the hypothesized negative wage effect, it is concluded that right-to-work legislation results in a worsening of the net economic position of black workers.





2001 ◽  
Vol 221 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Winkelmann

SummaryThe common estimator for relative adjusted wage differentials based on dummy variables in loglinear regressions is inconsistent in the presence of group-specific heteroskedasticity. The direction and magnitude of the bias are derived. At the same time, a heteroskedasticity-consistent estimator is proposed. The formulas are exact for normally distributed errors and approximations otherwise. An example on the wage determination in the German labor market shows that ignoring the problem of heteroskedasticity will lead to an underestimation of the relative wage gap between Germans and Immigrants, since the wages of immigrants are relatively less dispersed. Evidence from the literature as well as an independent analysis using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel for 1996 yield a downward bias of up to 25 percent. The importance of these results extend beyond the case of dummy variables to the general problem of Computing expectations of retransformed variables.



2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 478-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
DEBORAH O. LEE ◽  
KEVIN E. ROGERS ◽  
PAUL W. GRIMES


1984 ◽  
pp. 63-81
Author(s):  
Jean-François Hennart
Keyword(s):  


2016 ◽  
Vol 236 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Fendel

AbstractThis study provides an analysis of the effect of migration and commuting on regional wage disparities in Germany. Using the INKAR dataset and the GSOEP from the years 1998 to 2009, dynamic GMM panel estimations are applied to consider dynamics as well as the simultaneity between migration and regional labor market circumstances. To begin with, the influence of migration on relative wage levels is analyzed. The results show a small positive wage effect due to the overall regional migration balance. However, only domestic migration is relevant for analyzing the influence of migration on regional wage disparities. The wage effect due to domestic migration turns out to be smaller and negative. Regions seem to benefit primary from a combination of internal and foreign migration, however effects are small. Assuming that individuals usually move to high-wage regions, the negative wage effect of German migration would trigger an adjustment mechanism of wage disparities. Therefore, a second dynamic GMM panel estimation tests whether an influence of the regional wage levels on migration exists. Results show no statistically significant effects. An adjustment of existing wage disparities due to migration is not likely to occur in Germany in the next few years.



ILR Review ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 680-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Paul Schultz ◽  
Germano Mwabu

Few countries have higher wage inequality than South Africa, where wages of African and white workers differ by a factor of five. Using survey data collected in 1993, the authors analyze the complex effect of unions on this wage gap. Among male African workers in the bottom decile of the wage distribution, union membership was associated with wages that were 145% higher than those of comparable nonunion workers, and among those in the top decile the differential was 19%. Regression estimates also indicate that returns to observed productive characteristics of workers, such as education and experience, were larger for nonunion than union workers. If the large union relative wage effect were cut in half, the authors estimate that employment of African youth, age 16–29, would increase by two percentage points, and their labor force participation rate would also increase substantially.



2004 ◽  
pp. 66-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kapelyushnikov

The paper examines a specific model of wage-setting evolved in Russia under transition. Using new survey data author reveals paradoxical characteristics of wage-setting mechanisms at Russian industrial enterprises: very high union and collective agreement coverage; nearly unilateral control of managers over wage determination; close correlation between earnings and enterprises' performance; voluntary utilization of wage standards established by the state. The special section explores effects of fulfilling a new provision stipulated for by the recently adopted Labor Code to raise minimum wage to the subsistence minimum level. The author concludes that wage-setting in the Russian labor market is at odds with a textbook competitive model and poorly fits into many other sophisticated theoretical schemes (such as labor-managed firms, bargaining models etc.).



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document