Association Between Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Electronic Non-Nicotine Delivery Systems With Initiation of Tobacco Use in Individuals Aged < 20 Years - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sze Lin Yoong ◽  
Alix Edna Hall ◽  
Heidi Turon ◽  
Emily Stockings ◽  
Alecia Leonard ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0256044
Author(s):  
Sze Lin Yoong ◽  
Alix Hall ◽  
Heidi Turon ◽  
Emily Stockings ◽  
Alecia Leonard ◽  
...  

Background This systematic review described the association between electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENDS/ENNDS) use among non-smoking children and adolescents aged <20 years with subsequent tobacco use. Methods We searched five electronic databases and the grey literature up to end of September 2020. Prospective longitudinal studies that described the association between ENDS/ENNDS use, and subsequent tobacco use in those aged < 20 years who were non-smokers at baseline were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess risk of bias. Data were extracted by two reviewers and pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. We generated unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) describing associations between ENDS/ENNDS and tobacco use. Findings A total of 36 publications met the eligibility criteria, of which 25 were included in the systematic review (23 in the meta-analysis) after exclusion of overlapping studies. Sixteen studies had high to moderate risk of bias. Ever users of ENDS/ENNDS had over three times the risk of ever cigarette use (ARR 3·01 (95% CI: 2·37, 3·82; p<0·001, I2: 82·3%), and current cigarette use had over two times the risk (ARR 2·56 (95% CI: 1·61, 4·07; p<0·001, I2: 77·3%) at follow up. Among current ENDS/ENNDS users, there was a significant association with ever (ARR 2·63 (95% CI: 1·94, 3·57; p<0·001, I2: 21·2%)), but not current cigarette use (ARR 1·88 (95% CI: 0·34, 10·30; p = 0·47, I2: 0%)) at follow up. For other tobacco use, ARR ranged between 1·55 (95% CI 1·07, 2·23) and 8·32 (95% CI: 1·20, 57·04) for waterpipe and pipes, respectively. Additionally, two studies examined the use of ENNDS (non-nicotine devices) and found a pooled adjusted RR of 2·56 (95% CI: 0·47, 13·94, p = 0.035). Conclusion There is an urgent need for policies that regulate the availability, accessibility, and marketing of ENDS/ENNDS to children and adolescents. Governments should also consider adopting policies to prevent ENDS/ENNDS uptake and use in children and adolescents, up to and including a ban for this group.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Pound ◽  
Jennifer Zhang ◽  
Margaret Sampson ◽  
Ama Tweneboa Kodua

This review assesses the effect of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) on cigarette smoking cessation as compared other types of nicotine replacement therapies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. e33-e66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison M. Glasser ◽  
Lauren Collins ◽  
Jennifer L. Pearson ◽  
Haneen Abudayyeh ◽  
Raymond S. Niaura ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 102395
Author(s):  
G. Emmanuel Guindon ◽  
Tooba Fatima ◽  
Bipandeep Abbat ◽  
Prabhnoor Bhons ◽  
Sophiya Garasia

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 952-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Brandon ◽  
Maciej L. Goniewicz ◽  
Nasser H. Hanna ◽  
Dorothy K. Hatsukami ◽  
Roy S. Herbst ◽  
...  

Combustible tobacco use remains the number-one preventable cause of disease, disability, and death in the United States. Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), which include electronic cigarettes, are devices capable of delivering nicotine in an aerosolized form. ENDS use by both adults and youth has increased rapidly, and some have advocated these products could serve as harm-reduction devices and smoking cessation aids. ENDS may be beneficial if they reduce smoking rates or prevent or reduce the known adverse health effects of smoking. However, ENDS may also be harmful, particularly to youth, if they increase the likelihood that nonsmokers or former smokers will use combustible tobacco products or if they discourage smokers from quitting. The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recognize the potential ENDS have to alter patterns of tobacco use and affect the health of the public; however, definitive data are lacking. The AACR and ASCO recommend additional research on these devices, including assessing the health impacts of ENDS, understanding patterns of ENDS use, and determining what role ENDS have in cessation. Key policy recommendations include supporting federal, state, and local regulation of ENDS; requiring manufacturers to register with the US Food and Drug Administration and report all product ingredients, requiring childproof caps on ENDS liquids, and including warning labels on products and their advertisements; prohibiting youth-oriented marketing and sales; prohibiting child-friendly ENDS flavors; and prohibiting ENDS use in places where cigarette smoking is prohibited. This policy statement was developed by a joint writing group composed of members from the Tobacco and Cancer Subcommittee of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Science Policy and Government Affairs (SPGA) Committee and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Tobacco Cessation and Control Subcommittee of the Cancer Prevention Committee (CaPC). The statement was reviewed by both parent committees (ie, the AACR SPGA Committee and the ASCO CaPC) and was approved by the AACR Boards of Directors on August 6, 2014, and the ASCO Executive Committee on September 18, 2014. This policy statement was published jointly by invitation and consent in both Clinical Cancer Research and Journal of Clinical Oncology. Copyright 2015 American Association for Cancer Research and American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or storage in any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission by the American Association for Cancer Research and the American Society of Clinical Oncology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document