EFFECTS OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN JOB CREATION AND CROP PRODUCTION OF FARM FAMILIES IN THE SECOND DISTRICT OF NUEVA ECIJA, PHILIPPINES

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
June Vana ◽  
Danilo Vargas ◽  
CHRYSL AVEGEIL VALLEJO ◽  
Pablo Rafael ◽  
Parsons Hail ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
June Vana ◽  
Danilo Vargas ◽  
CHRYSL AVEGEIL VALLEJO ◽  
Pablo Rafael ◽  
Parsons Hail ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
June Vana ◽  
Danilo Vargas ◽  
CHRYSL AVEGEIL VALLEJO ◽  
Pablo Rafael ◽  
Parsons Hail

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toendepi Shonhe

The reinvestment of rural agrarian surplus is driving capital accumulation in Zimbabwe's countryside, providing a scope to foster national (re-) industrialisation and job creation. Contrary to Bernstein's view, the Agrarian Question on capital remains unresolved in Southern Africa. Even though export finance, accessed through contract farming, provides an impetus for export cash crop production, and the government-mediated command agriculture supports food crop production, the reinvestment of proceeds from the sale of agricultural commodities is now driving capital accumulation. Drawing from empirical data, gathered through surveys and in-depth interviews from Hwedza district and Mvurwi farming area in Mazowe district in Zimbabwe, the findings of this study revealed the pre-eminence of the Agrarian Question, linked to an ongoing agrarian transition in Zimbabwe. This agrarian capital elaborates rural-urban interconnections and economic development, following two decades of de-industrialisation in Zimbabwe. 


Technologies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Bozkurt ◽  
Karwowski ◽  
Çakıt ◽  
Ahram

This study presents a cellular automata (CA) model to assist decision-makers in understanding the effects of infrastructure development projects on adverse events in an active war theater. The adverse events are caused by terrorist activities that primarily target the civilian population in countries such as Afghanistan. In the CA-based model, cells in the same neighborhood synchronously interact with one another to determine their next states, and small changes in iteration yield to complex formations of adverse event risks. The results demonstrate that the proposed model can help in the evaluation of infrastructure development projects in relation to changes in the reported adverse events, as well as in the identification of the geographical locations, times, and impacts of such developments. The results also show that infrastructure development projects have different impacts on the reported adverse events. The CA modeling approach can be used to support decision-makers in allocating infrastructure development funds to stabilize active war regions with higher adverse event risks. Such models can also improve the understanding of the complex interactions between infrastructure development projects and adverse events.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
June Vana ◽  
Danilo Vargas ◽  
CHRYSL AVEGEIL VALLEJO ◽  
Pablo Rafael ◽  
Parsons Hail ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don Messerschmidt

‘Risk' is a major point of focus in the literature on resettlement and reconstruction associated with the impacts of major infrastructure development on project affected individuals and families. Previous approaches to risk appear to emphasize the negative consequences of development, and it is no wonder then that project affected people often emphatically resist development and change. This paper proposes that a more pro-active, positive opportunities and benefits approach be taken in dealing with resettlement and reconstruction associated with large scale infrastructure projects. The discussion is focused on the eight ‘risk factors' (or ‘opportunity factors'?) listed in the well known ‘Impoverishment Risk and Reconstruction' (IRR) Model. Three more such factors are added to the list based on field experience in South Asia. The point is that by emphasizing the potential opportunities and benefits, project affected people are more likely to be supportive of projects that may disrupt their lives. Key words: Resettlement, opportunities, risk, IRR model, South Asia, infrastructure development  doi: 10.3126/hn.v3i0.1912 Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment Issue No. 3, January, 2008 Page 9-15


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 467-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Van Damme ◽  
Hinko Van Geelen ◽  
Patricia Courange

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document