scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety Profile of Ivosidenib in the Management of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): An Update on the Emerging Evidence

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 41-54
Author(s):  
Galia Stemer ◽  
Jacob M Rowe ◽  
Yishai Ofran
Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (25) ◽  
pp. 41498-41507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pin-Fang He ◽  
Jing-Dong Zhou ◽  
Dong-Ming Yao ◽  
Ji-Chun Ma ◽  
Xiang-Mei Wen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7059-7059 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Sanford ◽  
William G. Blum ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Rebecca B. Klisovic ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5175-5175
Author(s):  
Liyan Fan ◽  
Aili Chen ◽  
Yixin Hu ◽  
Peifang Xiao ◽  
Jun Lu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: It is difficult for pediatric refractory and relapse acute myeloid leukemia (RR-AML) and MDS-RAEB/RAEBT patients to achieve complete remission (CR) and these patients develop recurrence and die of either disease progression or associated complications. The CAG regimen (cytarabine, aclarubicin and G-CSF) has been widely used in treating patients with MDS-EB and AML-MRC in Asia. Likely, Short term CAG derived regimens called low dose induction therapy, MAG regimen (Mitoxantrone for 3 doses, cytarabine and G-CSF for 10 days) also showed efficacy in De Novo AML. However, MAG regimen showed less efficacy in RR-AML and MDS-5(5q-). Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of low-dose decitabine in combination with low-dose MAG regimen (D-MAG regimen) in the treatment of RR-AML and MDS-RAEB/RAEBT. Method A total of 17 patients with MDS-RAEB/RAEBT and RR-AML((2 cases of MDS-RAEB, 3 cases of MDS-RAEBT, 10 cases for refractory AML, and 2 cases for relapse AML) from June 2017 to April 2018 in our center were included in the retrospective study. All the patients were treated with decitabine of 20 mg/m2 for 5 days and followed by 10 days of MAG regimen (cytarabine of 10mg/m2 q12h for 10 days, mitoxantrone of 5 mg/ m2.d for 3 days, and G-CSF of 5μg/kg.d for 10 days),called D-CAG regimen. After two cycles of induction chemotherapy, the patients who obtained CR received consolidation chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Results Among a total of 17 patients, the median age was the median age was 102 months (32-200 months) and 64.71 % of them were male. Characteristic features of these patients were illustrated in Table 1. Only 2 cases died of severe lung infection due to continuous agranulocytosis who had been received high dose induction therapy (Daunorubicin of 50mg/M2.d for 3 days, cytarabine of 100mg/m2 q12h for 10 days, and Etoposide of 150mg/m2.d for 5 days) for 2 cycles with poor physical condition before D-MAG. In the other 15 cases, 10 of them had complete remission (CR) after the first course of treatment, 4 cases were partial remission (PR), 1 case with a high blast cells at 25% indicated a poor response to D-MAG, and the effective rate was 93.3%. Among 4 children with PR, one case reached CR after the second courses of treatment. The most common adverse reactions in all children were hematological toxicity, grade III-IV. Liver damage was found in 2 cases, grade I and grade II respectively. There were 3 cases of oral side reactions, 1 case in grade I and 2 cases in grade II. The gastrointestinal reactions in all children were grade I - II. By July 2018, the median follow-up was 11 months (7-16months). Among 15 patients after D-MAG, 11 patients received HSCT. The twelve-month survival rate was 88.24% and the median leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 11 months. Conclusion The low-dose decitabine in combination with Low-dose MAG regimen improved CR rate for pediatric patients with MDS-RAEB and RR- AML, and is a promising treatment for pediatric patients with MDS/RR-AML. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5608-5608
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Theodorou Diamantopoulos ◽  
Konstantinos Zervakis ◽  
Athanasios G. Galanopoulos ◽  
Panagiotis Bakarakos ◽  
Vasiliki Papadopoulou ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine (AZA) has been the standard of care for higher risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) for the last few years. Its efficacy has been proven in large clinical trials, and its safety has been shown to be superior to that of conventional treatments. We have conducted a retrospective study about the efficacy and safety of 5-azacytidine, as reported and analyzed in our center. Patients and Methods Forty four consecutive patients with MDS or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with 20-30% bone marrow blasts that were treated with AZA during the last 63 months were included in the study. The clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients were recorded, and the efficacy and safety data were analyzed. Results The epidemiologic and hematologic characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The median overall survival was 13 months (1-101) and there was no primary treatment failure (Table 2). Serious adverse events consisted mostly of neutropenic infections (blood stream and pneumonia) (Table 3). Discussion Treatment with AZA offered a favorable (complete and partial) response in 34.1% of the patients, and an overall survival of 13 months, with generally predictable toxicities, although hospitalization was frequently inevitable during the first treatment cycles, when supportive treatment was a significant part of the management. A valuable observation is that there was a considerable decrease in the patients’ transfusion needs following treatment (p<0.0001). Our results are consistent with the results of other clinical trials and point out the need for investigational 5-azacytidine combinations. Table 1. Epidemiologic and hematologic characteristics. Male: Female ratio 30:14 (2.1 : 1) Age, Median (Range) 73 (54-81) WHO classification of MDS/AML, N (%) RAEB-I RAEB-II RCMD-RS RCMD RARS CMML AML 9 (20.5) 18 (40.9) 2 (4.5) 3 (6.7) 1 (2.3) 4 (9.1) 7 (15.9) IPSS classification, N (%) Low Intermediate-1 Intermediate-2 High Not Applicable (AML) 0 (0) 3 (6.8) 29 (65.9) 5 (11.4) 7 (15.9) Complete Blood Count Parameters, Median (Range) Hemoglobin (g/dL) Absolute Neutrophil Count (x109/L) Platelet count (x109/L) 8.55 (4.5 - 12.5) 1.08 (0.0 – 16.3) 80.0 (2 – 820) Transfusion dependence, N (%) 39 (88.6) Transfusions per month, Median (Range) 3 (0 – 7) Table 2. Efficacy data AZA cycles, Median (Range) 5 (1-22) Actual AZA dose (mg/m2/cycle), Median (Range) 75 (59-75) Actual cycle duration (days), Median (Range) 28 (28-40) Dose reductions due to sustained neutropenia, N (%) 6 (13.6) Temporary AZA interruption, N (%) 26 (59.1) Reason Sustained cytopenia 10/26 (38.5) Neutropenic Infection 15/26 (57.7) Hemorrhagic Complication 1/26 (3.8) Permanent AZA discontinuation, N (%) 23/44 (52.3) Reason AML transformation 17/23 (73.9) Recurrent or severe infection 4/23 (17.4) Pyoderma gangrenosum 1/23 (4.3) Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation 1/23 (4.3) AZA cycles till response (according to the IWG criteria), Median (Range) 4 (1 – 7) Response (IWG criteria), N (%) Complete response Partial response Stable disease Failure 7 (15.9) 8 (18.2) 29 (65.9) 0 (0) Overall survival (months), Median (Range) 13 (1 – 101) Post treatment transfusion dependence, N (%) 34 (77.3) Transfusions per month (post-treatment), Median (Range) 1 (0 – 5) Death rate, N (%) 29/44 (65.9) Cause of death, N (%) Infection Hemorrhage Cardiac dysrhythmia 24/29 (82.8) 3/29 (10.3) 2/29 (6.9) Table 3. Safety data Clinical adverse events, N (%) 29/44 (65.9) Neutropenic Infections 26/29 (89.7) Bloodstream Infection 9/26 (34.6) Lower respiratory infection 10/26 (38.5) Neutropenic Fever 8/26 (30.1) Septic shock 2/26 (7.7) Hemorrhagic events 2/29 (6.7) Cerebral hemorrhage (Grade 5) 1/2 (50.0) Epistaxis (Grade 3) 1/2 (50.0) Other (pyoderma gangrenosum) 1/29 (3.4) Laboratory incidents1, N (%) 44/44 (100) All grades Grades 3/4 Neutropenia 36/44 (81.8) 34/44 (77.3) Anemia 44/44 (100) 24/44 (54.5) Thrombocytopenia 31/44 (70.5) 21/44 (47.7) Supportive treatment (during AZA administration), N (%) GCSF administration 16/44 (36.4) Erythropoietin administration 7/44 (15.9) Red blood cell transfusions 39/44 (88.6) Red blood cell transfusions (units/cycle), Median (range) 3 (0-7) Pooled random donor platelet transfusions 17 (38.6) 1According to the CTCAE Version 4.0 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document