scholarly journals Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 5473-5480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ding-Ding Yan ◽  
Qiu Tang ◽  
Jian-Hong Chen ◽  
Ye-Qiang Tu ◽  
Xiao-Juan Lv
2017 ◽  
Vol 473 ◽  
pp. 198-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ru-ru Zheng ◽  
Xiao-xiu Huang ◽  
Chu Jin ◽  
Xin-xin Zhuang ◽  
Le-chi Ye ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
P. Anandhi

Cervical cancer continues to be one of the most common cancers among females, being the fourth most common after breast, colorectal, and lung cancer[1]. The FIGO 2018 staging system has brought in various pathological and radiological parameters for stage classification to guide treatment related decision making and for better prognostication. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to analyse the results of stage redistribution by applying 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer patients in a tertiary care cancer centre, who were previously staged according to FIGO 2009. METHODS: Data of all cervical cancer patients who underwent various forms of treatment at our institute including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy from Jan 2013 to Dec 2016 were collected from the Medical Records Department For this study, we re-staged all patients by the FIGO 2018 staging system RESULTS: The data of patients with carcinoma cervix diagnosed in the 4 years between 2013 & 2016 was tabulated according to both 2009 FIGO staging as well as 2018 FIGO staging. Significant up-staging to Stage IIIC1 & IIIC2 was noted. (Table 1& 2) CONCLUSION: The current FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer appears to be useful for predicting survival in patients considering radiological and pathological variables. As per our study, majority of the cancer cervix patients fall into a single subgroup – III C1; this, in a country were already most patients present with advanced disease, will skew the data further. Stage III C1 cervical cancer is not homogenous; sub classification within stage IIIC1 may result in better prognostication.


2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 1054-1058
Author(s):  
Daiken Osaku ◽  
Hiroaki Komatsu ◽  
Masayo Okawa ◽  
Yuki Iida ◽  
Shinya Sato ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kazuki Ishikawa ◽  
Tsuneo Yamashiro ◽  
Takuro Ariga ◽  
Takafumi Toita ◽  
Wataru Kudaka ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Fractures are known to shorten life expectancy and worsen the quality of life. The risk of fractures after radiation therapy in cervical cancer patients is known to be multifactorial. In this study, we examined risk factors for fractures in cervical cancer patients, especially by evaluating bone densities and DVH parameters for fractured bones. Materials and Methods For 42 patients, clinical characteristics, pretreatment CT bone densities, and radiation dose were compared between patients with and without fractures. Results Posttreatment fractures occurred in 25 bones among ten patients. Pretreatment CT bone densities were significantly lower in patients with fractures (P < 0.05–0.01 across sites, except for the ilium and the ischium). Although DVH parameters were also significantly associated with fractures in univariate analysis, only CT densities were significantly associated with fractures in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Pretreatment CT densities of spinal and pelvic bones, which may reflect osteoporosis, have a significant impact on the risk for posttreatment fractures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (2) ◽  
pp. 266-272
Author(s):  
Roman E. Zyla ◽  
Lilian T. Gien ◽  
Danielle Vicus ◽  
Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel ◽  
Jelena Mirkovic ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyra N. McComas ◽  
Anna M. Torgeson ◽  
Bryan J. Ager ◽  
Christopher Hellekson ◽  
Lindsay M. Burt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document