scholarly journals Predicting Prognosis and Adverse Events by Hematologic Markers in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 8497-8507
Author(s):  
Guoxin Cai ◽  
Jinming Yu ◽  
Xue Meng
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4042-4042
Author(s):  
Ta-Chen Huang ◽  
Chia-Chi Lin ◽  
Kai-Yuan Tzen ◽  
Yun-Chun Wu ◽  
Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng ◽  
...  

4042 Background: The optimal use of the metabolic tumor response measured by 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the treatment of esophageal cancer is currently unknown. We launched a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the early metabolic response to one-cycle chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, who subsequently received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (neo-CRT) followed by surgery. Methods: ESCC patients with stage T3 or N1M0 or M1a (AJCC, 6th edition) were enrolled to receive one-cycle chemotherapy, day 1 and 8 doses of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, followed by paclitaxel/cisplatin- based 40Gy neo-CRT and surgery. FDG-PET was performed at baseline and day 14 of the one-cycle chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response (pCR) to neo-CRT. We hypothesized that early PET responders, defined as > 35% reduction of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from the baseline, would significantly improve pCR. Results: Between Feb 2008 and Mar 2012, 66 patients (M: F = 61: 5) were enrolled. Their clinical stages were: II or III, 56; IVA, 10. Forty seven received surgery. The pCR rate per surgical population was 34.0%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the whole study group was 16 months (95% CI 9-27) and 22 months (95% CI 16-40), respectively. A total of53 patients were evaluable for PET response. The early PET response was not associated with high pCR rate or better survivals. However, in an exploratory analysis, the post-chemotherapy SUVmax was an independent prognostic factor for pCR, PFS and OS. A predictive model for pCR composed of weight loss and the post-chemotherapy SUVmaxwas established with an AUC of 0.84. Conclusions: Our study failed to validate the predictive value of predefined early PET response to one-cycle chemotherapy for pCR to neo-CRT in locally advanced ESCC patients. However, the FDG-PET SUVmax after one-cycle chemotherapy may have prognostic and predictive significance, and may be explored in further studies. Clinical trial information: NCT01034332.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nida Akgul ◽  
abdullah sakin ◽  
Suleyman Sahin ◽  
Mehmet Naci Aldemir ◽  
Aydin Aytekin ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an extremely fatal and relatively rare gastrointestinal system malignancy. This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting survival in operated patients with ESCC.Materials and Methods: We included 110 patients (38 [34.5%] male; 72 [65.5%] female) aged ≥18 (median age, 54 [26–77]) years who were operated without any signs of metastases and followed up at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Dursun Odabaşı Medical Center between 2004 and 2019.Results: Initially, 39 (35.5%) patients were clinical lymph node-positive and 71 (64.5%) patients were negative. Thirty-five (31.8%) patients underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and 75 (%68.2) patients underwent direct surgery without nCRT. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 84.4% and 59.2% in patients who underwent surgery after nCRT and in those who underwent direct surgery, respectively. Median OS was significantly longer in patients who underwent surgery after nCRT (p=0.003). There was a statistically significant difference in OS in patients who underwent surgery after nCRT depending on tumor response (p=0.04). In multivariate analysis, advanced pathologic stage (p=0.002) adversely affected survival, whereas nCRT administration (p=0.031) positively affected OS.Conclusion: We suggest that nCRT should be administrated before surgery, especially in locally advanced ESCCs. In addition, we believe that nCRT response can be used as a good parameter for survival. These results, however, should be supported by prospective studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document