scholarly journals Comparison of Docetaxel + Oxaliplatin + S-1 vs Oxalipatin + S-1 as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 6641-6653
Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Hejing Huang ◽  
Ziran Wei ◽  
Zhenxin Zhu ◽  
Dejun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Direct Surgery for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer With Serosal Invasion (cT4NxM0): A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xu ◽  
Lingquan Wang ◽  
Chao Yan ◽  
Changyu He ◽  
Sheng Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Serosal Invasion ◽  
D2 Gastrectomy ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

BackgroundFor locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) with serosal invasion (cT4NxM0), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after D2 gastrectomy is the standard therapy in Asia. However, perioperative chemotherapy (PCT) combined with D2 gastrectomy is mostly suggested in Europe and America. As a part of PCT, the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unclear. We investigated whether NAC could further improve survival and other outcomes for these patients.MethodsPatients with cT4NxM0 gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received NAC: the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and direct surgery (S) groups. After propensity score matching (1:1 ratio), survival and perioperative outcomes were analyzed between the two groups.ResultsA total of 902 patients met all the eligibility criteria and were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 221 matched pairs of patients were identified. The median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of all patients were 75.10 and 43.67 months, respectively. The median OS of patients in the NAC and S groups were undefined and 29.80 months, respectively (P<0.0001). The median DFS of patients in the NAC and S groups were undefined and 22.60 months (P<0.0001). There were no significant differences in the radical degrees of operation between the two groups (P=0.07). However, there were significant differences in postoperative hospital stay (P<0.001) and complications (P=0.037) between the two groups.ConclusionThis study suggested NAC can further improve prognosis and prevent recurrence in LAGC (cT4NxM0) patients. NAC is feasible and safe for LAGC (cT4NxM0) patients, and does not increase the risk of perioperative surgery.

scholarly journals Triplet versus doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghe Chen ◽  
Jiasheng He ◽  
Dan Liu ◽  
Jian Xiao ◽  
Xijie Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Surgery Complications ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Post Surgery

Abstract Background To investigate the differences between doublet and triplet neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens in efficacy and safety profile. Methods A total of 227 locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients who received NAC and sequential radical gastrectomy were reviewed. After propensity score matching (PSM), 140 patients with similar baseline characteristics were selected. Among them, 70 received doublet NAC regimens consisted of platinum and fluorouracil; the other 70 received triplet NAC regimens consisted of docetaxel, platinum, and fluorouracil. Results The efficacy of doublet and triplet regimens was comparable after propensity score matching in terms of tumor regression (pathological complete response, Doublet 11.4% vs. Triplet 15.7%, p = 0.642), achieving of R0 resection (Doublet 88.6% vs. Triplet 88.6%, p = 1), 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) (Doublet 77.1% vs. Triplet 68.6%, p = 0.178), 3-years overall survival (OS) (Doublet 54.3% vs. Triplet 60.9%, p = 0.941). Post-surgery complications were more common in the triplet cohort (Doublet 5.7% vs. Triplet 27.1%, p = 0.001), especially abdominal infection (Doublet 0% vs. Triplet 11.1%, p = 0.001). Conclusions A more intense preoperative triplet NAC regimen does not bring extra downstage effect and survival benefit compared to a doublet regimen. It may even result in a higher risk of post-surgery complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document