scholarly journals A Novel Non-Invasive Device for the Assessment of Central Venous Pressure in Hospital, Office and Home

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 141-154
Author(s):  
Emanuela Marcelli ◽  
Laura Cercenelli ◽  
Barbara Bortolani ◽  
Saverio Marini ◽  
Luca Arfilli ◽  
...  
1979 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 173
Author(s):  
J. A. D??RR ◽  
M. B. VALLOTTON ◽  
C. A. SIMON ◽  
B. KR??HENB??HL

The Lancet ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 311 (8064) ◽  
pp. 586-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Dürr ◽  
M.B. Vallotton ◽  
C.A. Simon ◽  
B. Krähenbühl

Author(s):  
Ahmed Abd Alrahman Baz ◽  
Amro Abdulrahim Ibrahim ◽  
Hussein Saeed El-Fishawy ◽  
Abo El-Magd Mohamed Al-Bohy

Abstract Background Assessment of the central venous pressure (CVP) is an essential hemodynamic parameter for monitoring the dialyzing patients. Our objective of the present study is to investigate the accuracy of CVP measurement by internal jugular vein US in comparison to the direct measurement by the central venous catheters for hemodialysis patients. We included 106 patients; where their CVP was assessed in two different non invasive US methods (CVPni) separately and in combination and the obtained measurements were correlated to the invasive measurements (CVPi) by catheters. Results By method 1, there is a highly significant positive correlation between CVPni and CVPi (ρ < 0.001) and a Pearson correlation coefficient (r = 0.913 n = 93), and by method 2, there is also a highly significant positive correlation between the CVPni and CVPi in both groups (r = 0.832, 95%, n = 106, p < 0.001), 1.935 was the cut-off point for prediction of CVP ≥ 10cmH20. For differentiation between patients with CVP < 10cmH20 and ≥ 10cmH20, the accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy) were 100%, 79.31%, 74.47%, 100%, and 87.10% by method 1, and were 91.11%, 85.48%, 82.00%, 92.98%, and 87.85% by method 2, while the combination of both methods had gained 88.57%, 89.66%, 83.78%, 92.86%, and 89.25%, respectively. Conclusion The US offered a reliable and non-invasive tool for monitoring CVP. The present study has a novelty of combining more than one US method and this had reported higher accuracy measures and outperformed the use of a single method.


2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Clinton

AbstractThe number of devices available to monitor the haemodynamic status of patients is increasing. Practitioners need to be aware of the non-invasive and invasive methods available in order to care for their patients safely and effectively. This article reviews a number of noninvasive measurements of haemodynamic function, in addition to invasive methods such as arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure and pulmonary artery pressure monitoring. It is argued that using these methods in combination provides a comprehensive haemodynamic assessment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1279-1285
Author(s):  
Maurizio Zanobetti ◽  
Alessio Prota ◽  
Alessandro Coppa ◽  
Laura Giordano ◽  
Sofia Bigiarini ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 1130-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Thalhammer ◽  
Martin Siegemund ◽  
Markus Aschwanden ◽  
Mirjam Gassmann ◽  
Ulrich A. Baumann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document