scholarly journals A Virtual Reality Orientation and Mobility Test for Inherited Retinal Degenerations: Testing a Proof-of-Concept After Gene Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 15 ◽  
pp. 939-952
Author(s):  
Tomas S Aleman ◽  
Alexander J Miller ◽  
Katherine H Maguire ◽  
Elena M Aleman ◽  
Leona W Serrano ◽  
...  
Crystals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Tao Zhan ◽  
En-Lin Hsiang ◽  
Kun Li ◽  
Shin-Tson Wu

We demonstrate a light efficient virtual reality (VR) near-eye display (NED) design based on a directional display panel and a diffractive deflection film (DDF). The DDF was essentially a high-efficiency Pancharatnam-Berry phase optical element made of liquid crystal polymer. The essence of this design is directing most of the display light into the eyebox. The proposed method is applicable for both catadioptric and dioptric VR lenses. A proof-of-concept experiment was conducted with off-the-shelf optical parts, where the light efficiency was enhanced by more than 2 times.


Pharmaceutics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 549
Author(s):  
Laura Garcia-Perez ◽  
Anita Ordas ◽  
Kirsten Canté-Barrett ◽  
Pauline Meij ◽  
Karin Pike-Overzet ◽  
...  

Recent clinical trials using patient’s own corrected hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), such as for primary immunodeficiencies (Adenosine deaminase (ADA) deficiency, X-linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID), X-linked chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), Wiskott–Aldrich Syndrome (WAS)), have yielded promising results in the clinic; endorsing gene therapy to become standard therapy for a number of diseases. However, the journey to achieve such a successful therapy is not easy, and several challenges have to be overcome. In this review, we will address several different challenges in the development of gene therapy for immune deficiencies using our own experience with Recombinase-activating gene 1 (RAG1) SCID as an example. We will discuss product development (targeting of the therapeutic cells and choice of a suitable vector and delivery method), the proof-of-concept (in vitro and in vivo efficacy, toxicology, and safety), and the final release steps to the clinic (scaling up, good manufacturing practice (GMP) procedures/protocols and regulatory hurdles).


2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 3211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artur V. Cideciyan ◽  
Alejandro J. Roman ◽  
Samuel G. Jacobson ◽  
Boyuan Yan ◽  
Michele Pascolini ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Manish Kumar Jha ◽  
Marwa Boukadida ◽  
Hamdi Ben Abdessalem ◽  
Alexie Byrns ◽  
Marc Cuesta ◽  
...  

Hematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 226-233
Author(s):  
Lindsey A. George

Abstract After 3 decades of clinical trials, repeated proof-of-concept success has now been demonstrated in hemophilia A and B gene therapy. Current clinical hemophilia gene therapy efforts are largely focused on the use of systemically administered recombinant adeno-associated viral (rAAV) vectors for F8 or F9 gene addition. With multiple ongoing trials, including licensing studies in hemophilia A and B, many are cautiously optimistic that the first AAV vectors will obtain regulatory approval within approximately 1 year. While supported optimism suggests that the goal of gene therapy to alter the paradigm of hemophilia care may soon be realized, a number of outstanding questions have emerged from clinical trial that are in need of answers to harness the full potential of gene therapy for hemophilia patients. This article reviews the use of AAV vector gene addition approaches for hemophilia A and B, focusing specifically on information to review in the process of obtaining informed consent for hemophilia patients prior to clinical trial enrollment or administering a licensed AAV vector.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astra Dinculescu ◽  
Jackie Estreicher ◽  
Juan C. Zenteno ◽  
Tomas S. Aleman ◽  
Sharon B. Schwartz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document