scholarly journals Barriers to good glycemic control levels and adherence to diabetes management plan in adults with Type-2 diabetes in Jordan: a literature review

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 675-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amer Al-Sahouri ◽  
Joy Merrell ◽  
Sherrill Snelgrove
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Good Glycemic Control

scholarly journals DIABETES SELF MANAGEMENT DAN FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHINYA PADA USIA DEWASA PERTENGAHAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Sucipto Dwitanta ◽  
Debie Dahlia
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Middle Age ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Good Glycemic Control ◽  
Factors Affecting

Diabetes mellitus is six main causes of death in the world. Diabetes mellitus that is not managed properly can run the risk of causing various long-term complications. Type 2 diabetes has a prevalence of 2 to 2.5 times more risk of heart disease accompanied by microvascular and macrovascular complications. Prevent various kinds of life-threatening complications in middle adulthood is to use the diabetes self management (DSM) approach. DSM desperately needs commitment to a very complex diabetes management regimen to achieve good glycemic control. This literature review aims to analyze factors affecting diabetes self management in type 2 diabetes in middle-age adult patients. The literature review used in this study uses journal related by searching in scientific-based databases, with keywords used middle-age adult - diabetes self-management - type 2 diabetes. Based on the literature results, several factors that can affect DSM in middle-aged adult patients include depression, self-efficacy, social support, and knowledge. Therefore, the importance of further research is to be able to see which factors are the most influential among the four factors, so that nurses can make plans to overcome these problems.

scholarly journals Impact of Covid19 Lockdown on Glycemic Control

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A345-A345
Author(s):  
Giovanna Rodriguez ◽  
Mert Bahtiyar ◽  
Johnathan Kirupakaran ◽  
Alaa Kubbar ◽  
Shikha Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Glucose Control ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Good Glycemic Control ◽  
City Community ◽  
Adherence To Medication ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Evidence shows that people with poor glycemic control are at greater risk of mortality due to Covid19. It is important to achieve and maintain good glycemic control to prevent negative outcomes during this pandemic (1). To study the effect of lockdown on glucose control we conducted an observational, retrospective cohort study involving 98 patients followed at endocrine clinic at an inner city, community hospital in Brooklyn, NY in the period February to May 2020. Of the cohort, 60% were women, mean age was 54.1 + 15.3 years, 70% was Hispanic, 24% was African American with a predominance of type 2 diabetes (86%). Mean HbA1c of prelockdown and lockdown phase was 9.77 ± 2.26% and 9.49 ± 2.17 % respectively and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001) both in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Mean BMI of prelockdown and lockdown phase was 30.5 ± 6.8% and 30.1 ± 6.05% respectively and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.33). Despite no significant change in BMI, the factors responsible for improvement in HbA1c might be a result of refined eating patterns (increased consumption of homemade food), increased adherence to medication and time to cope with the daily challenges of diabetes management (1). Reference: Maddaloni E, Coraggio L, Pieralice S, Carlone A, Pozzilli P, Buzzetti R. Effects of COVID-19 Lockdown on Glucose Control: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data From People With Diabetes on Intensive Insulin Therapy. Diabetes Care Aug 2020, 43 (8) e86-e87; DOI: 10.2337/dc20-0954

scholarly journals Vitamin D deficiency and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes population

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 464-474
Author(s):  
Sushant Pokhrel ◽  
Nisha Giri ◽  
Rakesh Pokhrel ◽  
Bashu Dev Pardhe ◽  
Anit Lamichhane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
High Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Vitamin D Deficiency ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Good Glycemic Control

Abstract This study aims to assess vitamin D deficiency-induced dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in poor glycemic control among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. This study was carried out among 455 T2DM patients involving poor glycemic control (n = 247) and good glycemic control (n = 208). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c were measured to assess glycemic control. Cardiac risk ratio, atherogenic index plasma, and atherogenic coefficient were calculated to assess and compare the CVD risk in different groups. Patients with poor control had a significantly higher level of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and non-high-density lipoprotein lipase cholesterol (non-HDL-C), atherogenic variables, and lower level of high-density lipoprotein lipase cholesterol (HDL-C) as compared to patients with good glycemic control. We also observed significant negative correlation of vitamin D with lipid markers and atherogenic variables in poor glycemic control diabetic population. The serum vitamin D levels were inversely associated with HbA1c, FPG, TG, TC, and non-HDL-C. Furthermore, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and elevated non-HDL-C were the independent risks in hypovitaminosis D population. Vitamin D deficiency in poor glycemic control is likely to develop dyslipidemia as compared to vitamin D insufficient and sufficient groups. Thus, vitamin D supplementation and an increase in exposure to sunlight may reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications in diabetes.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of telephone interventions as a strategy for glycemic control: an integrative literature review

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hérica Cristina Alves de Vasconcelos ◽  
Roberto Wagner Júnior Freire de Freitas ◽  
Niciane Bandeira Pessoa Marinho ◽  
Marta Maria Coelho Damasceno ◽  
Thelma Leite de Araújo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Adult Type ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Time Period

The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of telephone interventions as a strategy for glycemic control in adult Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients. An integrative literature review was undertaken in April and May 2011 through surveys in the Cochrane, PubMed/Medline, Lilacs and Cinahl databases. Nine studies complied with the inclusion criteria, mainly randomized controlled clinical trials. Concerning the time period analyzed in each study, it varied from eight weeks to twelve months. 1294 patients participated in the study, being 671 randomized to telephone follow-ups and 479 to usual care. In eight studies analyzed, glycemic control was based on the levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). The information found showed that the interventions are effective for glycemic control in patients who have type 2 Diabetes. Self-management was improved and possible complications of the disease were reduced.

Benefits of micronised Fenofibrate in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects with good glycemic control

2001 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 469-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.E. Tan ◽  
L.S. Chew ◽  
E.S. Tai ◽  
L.F. Chio ◽  
H.S. Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Good Glycemic Control

scholarly journals Comparison of Effectiveness between DPP4 inhibitors combined with Versus Other Oral Hypoglycaemic Agent(s) in Diabetic patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-70
Author(s):  
Md Shameem Haidar
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Glycemic Status ◽  
Good Glycemic Control ◽  
Dpp4 Inhibitor ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Inhibitor Combination

Background: Diabetes is global health burden of disease that requires life-long pharmacological and non-pharmacological management to prevent complications such as cardiovascular disease, retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. Treatment of type 2 diabetes is based on an interplay of patient characteristics, severity of hyperglycemia and available therapeutic options. Metformin, sulfonylureas (SU) and DPP IV inhibitor are the most studied of the oral medications used worldwide. They play a prominent initial role in the type 2 diabetes treatment algorithm recommended by the several guideline. The growing evidence on new technologies and therapeutic interventions is rapidly expanding our knowledge and ability to manage diabetes and its complications; at the same time, however, it is challenge for physicians to select appropriate medication in appropriate dose for optimal patients care. Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of the dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors combination with other oral hypoglycaemic agent(s) in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control. Materials & method: Study was conducted among 600 patients over a period of 24 months. All the patients were adult male and female type 2 diabetic patients who received regular oral anti-diabetic drug(s) and duration of T2DM for one year or more were enrolled for study. Total 150 cases were selected. Patients with Type 1 DM, pregnant women with DM and who was receiving injectable antidiabetic medications were excluded from this study. Detail demographic data were collected from the informant and recorded in structured case report form. Clinical examination and relevant investigations were done. Main outcome variable was Glycemic status (HbA1C, FBG, 2HABF). Effectiveness of drugs was evaluated by glycaemic status of the patients. Result: Maximum number of patients (38.5%) was between 31-40 years age group with mean age 37.8±9.5 years. Present study shows that, for good glycemic control, all three results (FBS, 2H ABF and HbA1c) were within targeted level in majority patients of DPP4 Inhibitor combination group. Although FBS was best result in metformin group. About 51.9% of SUs group achieved the glycemic control targets level. In case of metformin group it was in 59.8% of patients, and in combined therapy 67.1% patients shows good glycemic target. So DPP4 Inhibitor combination is better medication than other to maintain good glycemic status in type 2 DM patient, due to maximum number of patients reached all three components of result within target range. Conclusion: Diabetes is chronic illness. Good glycemic control with choosing appropriate anti-diabetic medication is pivotal for DM management. In this study it is observed that DPP4 Inhibitor combination group of drug is better than other anti-diabetic medication to maintain good glycemic status in type 2 DM patients. Bangladesh J Medicine July 2019; 30(2) : 63-70

Effect of Passive Vibration on Skin Blood Flow in Persons with Good Glycemic Control and Poor Glycemic Control Type 2 Diabetes

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 288
Author(s):  
Kanikkai Steni Balan Sackiriyas ◽  
Everett B Lohman ◽  
Noha S Daher ◽  
Lee S Berk ◽  
Rafael Canizales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Skin Blood Flow ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Good Glycemic Control
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document