scholarly journals Konsep Nilai Wajar (Fair Value) dalam Standar Akuntansi Berbasis IFRS di Indonesia Apa dan Bagaimana?

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Heri Sukendar W.
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Banking Industry ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Book Value ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
The Difference ◽  
International Accounting Standard

This paper is intended to explain the use of the concept of fair value instead of book value. The accounting world in Indonesia during the last few years have made convergency implementation of new accounting standards oriented to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by International Accounting Standard Boars (IASB). This new accounting standard that emphasizes the concept of fair value compared with book value concept is outdated. The use of the concept of fair value of the difference and it turned out to be a trigger konvergency change the paradigm of the book value of a simpler, but less information is less transparent. The implementation of accounting standards konverjensi done gradually raises serious problems, this can be seen from postponed the application of PSAK 50 & PSAK 55 in the banking industry. Knowledge and experience of inadequate is a priority of fair value implementation difficulties.

scholarly journals Mengukur Tingkat Kesesuaian antara Standar Akuntansi Keuangan dengan International Financial Reporting Standards per 1 Januari 2008

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Rosinta Ria Panggabean
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
International Accounting ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Spearman’S Correlation ◽  
International Accounting Standard

International accounting topic was rare to adress between accounting practices, especially International Accounting Standard. It occured due to the restrictive source and difficulty in finding the source. However, recently the standard has been an addressed issue since Indonesia Chartered of Accountant (IAI) plans to comply the Indonesia Accounting Standard (SAK) with the International Financialreporting(IFRS)on1stJanuary2012.The purpose of the research is to measure the compliance of the (SAK) per 1st January 2008 with the IFRS per 1st January 2008 and attain the association between those two standards. Hence, the difference between the two standards and the neccessary steps to be taken for complying can be obtained. The methodology will be used in the paper are Jaccard’s Coefficients, Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient,Euclidean Distances.The sample for the paper will be 43 accounting issues adressed on both standards that have been chosen and investigated. The paper concludes that there are significant equalities (75%) between SAK per 1st January 2008 and IFRS 1st January 2008. (using Jaccard’s Coefficients). Due to several problems that have been found in the research, the author wish that the further researchers could widen the research’s samples, so the result will be more accurate and comprehensive. 

scholarly journals Convergence of IFRS and Ind AS – A Descriptive and Exploratory Insight

2021 ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
Sayan Basu
Keyword(s):  
Advisory Committee ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
International Accounting ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
International Accounting Standard ◽  
Financial Analyses

IFRS are designed to bring consistency to accounting language, practices and statements, and to help businesses and investors make educated financial analyses and decisions. The Ind AS are named and numbered in the same way as the corresponding International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards (NACAS) recommends these standards to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). Indian viewpoints do not receive adequate attention at International Accounting Standard Board (IASB). Those are not debated adequately at the IASB before rejection. The present paper will discuss the reasons behind convergence of IFRs, rather than adoption. It also shows the Carve Outs of Ind AS from IFRS by providing valid reasons.

Absicherung von Zinsänderungsrisiken nach IAS 39

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
Thomas Kümpel ◽  
René Pollmann
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
International Accounting ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Hedge Accounting ◽  
Ias 39 ◽  
International Accounting Standard

Die Bilanzierung ökonomischer Sicherungszusammenhänge, das so genannte Hedge Accounting, gehört zu den am meisten kontrovers diskutierten und umstrittenen Vorschriften der International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Betroffen sind insbesondere die vom International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) veröffentlichten Regelungen zum Portfolio Fair Value Hedge Accounting von Zinsänderungsrisiken. Diese können als eine Weiterentwicklung der bisherigen Hedge Accounting Vorschriften angesehen werden, stoßen jedoch insbesondere in der Kreditwirtschaft auf Kritik. Der vorliegende Artikel befasst sich mit dem im International Accounting Standard 39 (IAS 39) verankerten Regelkreislauf des Portfolio Fair Value Hedge Accounting von Zinsänderungsrisiken. Dabei werden insbesondere die einzelnen Teilschritte herausgestellt und anschließend die Abbildung in der Bilanz und Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung dargestellt. The balancing of economic hedging activities, the so-called hedge accounting, is one of the most controversial and contentious discussed regulation of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This concerns in particular the regulations according to the Fair Value Hedge Accounting of interest rate risks issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB). Those can be considered as a development of recent hedge accounting regulations, but especially in the banking industry they met with criticism. Keywords: abischerung von zinsänderungsrisiken nach ias 39

Accounting Concepts in Company Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-427
Author(s):  
Jesper Seehausen
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Company Law ◽  
International Accounting Standards ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Eu Legislation ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Pros And Cons

Abstract Taking as a starting point Peter Hommelhoff’s argumentation that accounting law is, in many respects, linked to company law, the purpose of this article is to discuss one perspective of the links between accounting law and company law: accounting concepts in company law. After a brief outline of the existing EU legislation on accounting and a discussion on whether accounting law is part of company law, some examples of accounting concepts in company law – i. e. examples of accounting concepts that have been ‘implemented’ in company law – are discussed, drawing on the Consolidated Company Law Directive (CCLD) and the Shareholder Rights Directive (SRD 2) as well as the International Accounting Standards (IAS) and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). These examples are related party transactions, consideration other than in cash and fair value, serious loss of the subscribed capital as well as a few other examples. It is also discussed whether accounting concepts in company law are a ‘good’ or a ‘bad’ thing. Balancing the pros and cons, in the author’s opinion, it is mostly positive that accounting concepts are used in company law in areas where this makes sense – and hence, in the author’s opinion, accounting concepts in company law are mainly a ‘good’ thing.

scholarly journals Ensino Embasado na Estrutura Conceitual: a escolha da metodologia ativa para aplicação de casos para ensino importa?

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gleison De Abreu Pontes ◽  
Kellma Bianca Cardoso Fonseca ◽  
Ariane Caruline Fernandes ◽  
Patrícia De Souza Costa
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
International Accounting ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
International Accounting Standard

Objetivo: Identificar quais competências são desenvolvidas na aplicação de casos para ensino com a utilização de técnicas de ensino diferentes, à luz do Ensino Embasado na Estrutura Conceitual (EEEC) e da Taxonomia de Bloom. Método: Foram testadas três técnicas de ensino: Grupo de Verbalização e de Observação (GVGO), Júri Simulado e Problem-Based Learning (PBL). A percepção dos discentes foi coletada por meio de questionário e grupo focal. Resultados: Na percepção dos estudantes, o emprego das técnicas, desenvolveu habilidades e competências distintas. Assim, a escolha da metodologia para aplicação de casos deve estar alinhada com os objetivos educacionais estabelecidos pelo docente. Além disso, apesar de terem sido desenvolvidas competências de todos os estágios do EEEC, GVGO e PBL desenvolveram mais aquelas do estágio 3, enquanto o Júri Simulado aquelas do estágio 2. Contribuições: Os resultados podem ser úteis para o International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) ir além do desenvolvimento de casos para ensino no EEEC, incorporando na agenda reflexões sobre quais metodologias utilizar na aplicação desses materiais no instituto de alcançar o objetivo aplicação coerente das International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Essas reflexões também podem ser realizadas por pesquisadores e docentes a fim de contribuírem com o EEEC.

scholarly journals Continued Impact of International Financial Reporting Standards on U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Sylwia Gornik-Tomaszewski ◽  
Victoria Shoaf
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Accounting Principles ◽  
Value Measurement ◽  
The Impact

The milestone outcomes of over a decade of close cooperation between the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on the convergence of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) have been highly publicized in the professional media. Great attention has been paid to such joint FASB and IASB projects as accounting for business combinations, fair value measurement, and revenue recognition. The impact of U.S. GAAP on IFRS has also been discussed and highlighted in many professional and academic resources. It should come as no surprise since FASB is considered a world leader in creating high-quality standards through an exemplary standard-setting process. In this paper, we look at the least noticed outcome of the convergence process: the impact of IFRS on U.S. GAAP. We reviewed all of the Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®, from the first issued in June 2009 to 2016, and listed instances where U.S. GAAP was significantly modified to reflect international solutions. These examples of U.S. GAAP modifications indicate that the impact of IFRS on U.S. GAAP continued well after the bilateral cooperation between FASB and IASB effectively ended in 2014. Furthermore, look at the most recent FASB pronouncement let us conclude that the FASB continues to be engaged in seeking comparable global accounting solutions.

scholarly journals Accounting For Agricultural Products: US Versus IFRS GAAP

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Treba Marsh ◽  
Mary Fischer
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
International Accounting ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Historical Cost ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
The Us ◽  
Accounting Recognition ◽  
International Accounting Standard

Currently there is a mix of accounting guidance for agriculture producers in the US that is both GAAP including Accounting Statement Codification 905 and non-GAAP financial guidelines. Should the US adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), this guidance would be replaced with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 41 Agriculture. This study identifies systematic differences between the US and International accounting and reporting for agricultural assets and products. The study also finds that international and US agricultural accounting recognition and reporting guidance result in dissimilar reporting due to guidance interpretation. Valuation variances and definition differences including the requirement to change the agricultural asset recognition method from historical cost to fair value continue to be the basis of major reporting differences. Current US guidance on recognizing and reporting agricultural assets is more conservative than the international guidance. Overall, the US agricultural recognition and reporting guidance contains less information and is therefore less beneficial to financial statement users.

Transparency of Fair Value Accounting and Tax

2014 ◽  
pp. 476-494
Author(s):  
Eva Eberhartinger ◽  
Soojin Lee
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Comprehensive Income ◽  
Accounting Measurement ◽  
Other Comprehensive Income

This chapter examines transparency in fair value accounting (measurement, presentation, additional disclosure), with special emphasis on tax disclosure and on the presentation of fair values in the statement of other comprehensive income. After considering the international relevance of the International Financial Reporting Standards, the chapter discusses fair value accounting in the context of accounting standards. It then reviews prior research to determine whether fair value accounting adds to accounting transparency. It also looks at the measurement and presentation of the transparency of fair value accounting based on relevance and reliability, along with issues of earnings management and procyclical effects.

scholarly journals A study of Effects and implications of differences between Indian GAAP and IFRS

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anubha Srivastava
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Reporting System ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Ifrs Adoption

Economic growth in any economy requires sustainable high-quality financial reporting standards. However in the era of globalization, with rapidly changing rules and regulations in accounting world, Indian financial reporting system too cannot be isolated from the global developments. Lack of standardization in different accounting standards imposes a financial burden on all the stakeholders, which includes both internal as well as external burden to an organization. It is also too cumbersome for investors to compare the financial statement of corporates if they follow different accounting policy. It was felt that there should be one global set of accounting standards for all. Thus IASB came in existence and formulated IFRS. IFRS is high-quality principle-based accounting standard which aims to bring uniformity comparability and transparency in accounting world. In India the conversion process has started in 2015-16 onwards where all the accounting standards will be gradually fully converged with IFRS and will be named as Ind as. This paper attempts to find out the key difference among IFRS, Indian GAAP and ind AS and its implications. A questionnaire survey has been conducted to find out the implication of differences. The paper concludes that adoption of IFRS would benefit the economy in all aspects. Keywords: IFRS, Indian GAAP, Ind AS, key difference between IFRS, Ind AS and Indian GAAP, IFRS adoption,

scholarly journals Accounting Standards and International Portfolio Holdings

2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 1895-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwen Yu ◽  
Aida Sijamic Wahid
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Asset Allocation ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Portfolio Holdings ◽  
Ifrs Adoption ◽  
Mandatory Adoption ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Allocation Decisions

ABSTRACT Do differences in countries' accounting standards affect global investment decisions? We explore this question by examining how accounting distance, the difference in the accounting standards used in the investor's and the investee's countries, affects the asset allocation decisions of global mutual funds. We find that investors tend to underweight investees with greater accounting distance. Using the mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as an event that changed the accounting standards of various country-pairs, we examine how two sources of changes in accounting distance—(1) changes due to IFRS adoption of the investee, and (2) changes due to IFRS adoption in the investor's country—affect global portfolio allocation decisions. We find that the tendency to underinvest in investees with greater accounting distance significantly weakens when accounting distance is reduced, either from an investee's IFRS adoption or from IFRS adoption in the investor's country. The latter finding holds despite the fact that IFRS adoption in the investor's country had no impact on the accounting standards under which the investee firms present their financial information; the only change is in the investor's familiarity with these standards. This suggests that differences in accounting standards affect investor demand by imposing greater information-processing costs on those less familiar with the reporting standards.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document