scholarly journals Hybrid passive control system of TLD and TMD for seismic response mitigation of Tall Buildings

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 3648-3667
Author(s):  
Hamid Reza Samiee
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Passive Control ◽  
Tall Buildings

scholarly journals Review on vibration control in tall buildings: from the perspective of devices and applications

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
BG Kavyashree ◽  
Shantharam Patil ◽  
Vidya S. Rao
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Active Control ◽  
Structural Control ◽  
Passive Control ◽  
Hybrid Control ◽  
Tall Buildings ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Earthquake Load ◽  
History Of ◽  
External Loads

AbstractPermanent construction has evolved from the Palaeolithic age to today’s skyscrapers. Constructing the structure, which promises occupants safety, has become a concern because of the uncertainties in nature. Therefore in recent years, attention has been given to the development of structural protective devices that could take care of the external loads. Structural control against the wind and earthquake load has been seriously studied where the structure behaves differently for wind and earthquake load has been briefly discussed in this paper. Initially, paper discusses the history of the construction and the passive control system, which was used in structural control, is briefly discussed in this paper. Also, the implementation of active control has been discussed which was introduced later in the structural control for more effective control. But the limitations of the passive and active control system have introduced semi-active control and also the hybrid control strategy. The two mechanisms are put together in the semi-active and hybrid system to obtain all advantages of the algorithm along with overcoming their limitations. The review also briefs about stochastic vibrational control of the structure where randomness is considered in external loads, parameter of the system and also in the external devices which are implemented in the structural control. As construction sector is a complex system, big data analysis, a new field in structural control system is discussed and future scope is also mentioned.

Brief Introduction of Traditional Seismic Technology and Emerging Isolation Technology

2014 ◽  
Vol 1010-1012 ◽  
pp. 250-253
Author(s):  
Ji Yang Li ◽  
Wen Fang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Seismic Isolation ◽  
Passive Control ◽  
Base Isolation ◽  
Seismic Structure ◽  
Natural Period ◽  
Isolation Layer ◽  
Passive Seismic

Seismic can be divided into passive seismic and active seismic. Seismic isolation technology belong to the second type. Base isolation structure is defined by setting the isolation layer between the superstructure and foundation building, to extend the natural period architecture, increasing the damping to reduce structural seismic response. It is a passive control system. Compared with the traditional seismic structure, it mainly through the isolation layer to absorb and dissipate energy, reducing the response to the earthquake.

scholarly journals Evolution of Outrigger Structural System: A State-of-the-Art Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. G. Kavyashree ◽  
Shantharam Patil ◽  
Vidya S. Rao
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Active Control ◽  
Structural Control ◽  
Passive Control ◽  
Performance Enhancement ◽  
System Development ◽  
Tall Buildings ◽  
Smart Devices ◽  
Structural System ◽  
Active Control System

AbstractThis paper presents the development of the outrigger structural system from the conventional outrigger to damped outrigger concepts. Outrigger structural system development from the conservative design as a rigid connection to a virtual connection with passive control, active control system, semi-active control system to hybrid control system is deliberated. Following brief overviews on history of outriggers, types of the outrigger, analysis of tall buildings without outriggers, formulation of equations for outrigger structure to simplify analysis are elaborated. Different approach to locate optimum positioning of outriggers in tall structure is elucidated. Analysis of outrigger to study its behavior in high-rise buildings using different methods is stated, and review on the damped outrigger system is explicated. This paper tries to highlight the advantages of outrigger structure with semi-active control and performance enhancement of the outrigger system with the effective devices, and enhanced results are also depicted. This review also paves a way for the new area of research in structural control with the incorporation of smart devices and smart technology.

scholarly journals Seismic rocking effects on a mine tower under induced and natural earthquakes

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Adam Bońkowski ◽  
Juliusz Kuś ◽  
Zbigniew Zembaty
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Tall Buildings ◽  
Earthquake Ground Motion ◽  
Seismic Action ◽  
Seismic Effects ◽  
Copper Ore ◽  
Rotational Components ◽  
Natural Earthquakes

AbstractRecent research in engineering seismology demonstrated that in addition to three translational seismic excitations along x, y and z axes, one should also consider rotational components about these axes when calculating design seismic loads for structures. The objective of this paper is to present the results of a seismic response numerical analysis of a mine tower (also called in the literature a headframe or a pit frame). These structures are used in deep mining on the ground surface to hoist output (e.g. copper ore or coal). The mine towers belong to the tall, slender structures, for which rocking excitations may be important. In the numerical example, a typical steel headframe 64 m high is analysed under two records of simultaneous rocking and horizontal seismic action of an induced mine shock and a natural earthquake. As a result, a complicated interaction of rocking seismic effects with horizontal excitations is observed. The contribution of the rocking component may sometimes reduce the overall seismic response, but in most cases, it substantially increases the seismic response of the analysed headframe. It is concluded that in the analysed case of the 64 m mining tower, the seismic response, including the rocking ground motion effects, may increase up to 31% (for natural earthquake ground motion) or even up to 135% (for mining-induced, rockburst seismic effects). This means that not only in the case of the design of very tall buildings or industrial chimneys but also for specific yet very common structures like mine towers, including the rotational seismic effects may play an important role.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document