scholarly journals Population structure and genome-wide association analysis for salinity tolerance in wheat using SNP, SSR and SCoT marker assays.

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Alsamman Alsamman ◽  
Shafik Ibrahim ◽  
Mohamed Rashed ◽  
Shaimaa Ahmed ◽  
Aladdin Hamwieh ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0260709
Author(s):  
Shaimaa Mahmoud Ahmed ◽  
Alsamman Mahmoud Alsamman ◽  
Abdulqader Jighly ◽  
Mohamed Hassan Mubarak ◽  
Khaled Al-Shamaa ◽  
...  

Soil salinity is significant abiotic stress that severely limits global crop production. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important grain legume that plays a substantial role in nutritional food security, especially in the developing world. This study used a chickpea population collected from the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Area (ICARDA) genebank using the focused identification of germplasm strategy. The germplasm included 186 genotypes with broad Asian and African origins and genotyped with 1856 DArTseq markers. We conducted phenotyping for salinity in the field (Arish, Sinai, Egypt) and greenhouse hydroponic experiments at 100 mM NaCl concentration. Based on the performance in both hydroponic and field experiments, we identified seven genotypes from Azerbaijan and Pakistan (IGs: 70782, 70430, 70764, 117703, 6057, 8447, and 70249) as potential sources for high salinity tolerance. Multi-trait genome-wide association analysis (mtGWAS) detected one locus on chromosome Ca4 at 10618070 bp associated with salinity tolerance under hydroponic and field conditions. In addition, we located another locus specific to the hydroponic system on chromosome Ca2 at 30537619 bp. Gene annotation analysis revealed the location of rs5825813 within the Embryogenesis-associated protein (EMB8-like), while the location of rs5825939 is within the Ribosomal Protein Large P0 (RPLP0). Utilizing such markers in practical breeding programs can effectively improve the adaptability of current chickpea cultivars in saline soil. Moreover, researchers can use our markers to facilitate the incorporation of new genes into commercial cultivars.


Crop Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1504-1515
Author(s):  
Shiferaw G. Tigist ◽  
Rob Melis ◽  
Julia Sibiya ◽  
Assefa B. Amelework ◽  
Gemechu Keneni ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Enrico Mancin

Abstract Several methods are available for genome-wide association analysis, including the classical GWAA (cGWAA) based on fixed, single-SNP regression; efficient mixed-model association expedited (EMMAX) that fits single-SNP regressions together with a relationship matrix to account for population structure; and single-step GWAA (ssGWAA) where all data, including non-genotyped animals, are used. The objectives of this study were to: 1) investigate the ability of ssGWAA to account for population structure and correctly identify quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN); and 2) compare ssGWAA with cGWAA and EMMAX. Three simulated datasets were used, which mimic fish, beef cattle, and dairy cattle populations. The fish population was composed of 2,040 fish, out of which 1,040 were genotyped and had phenotypes for a trait with heritability of 0.25. The beef cattle population had 6,010 animals in the pedigree, but only 1,500 with phenotypes (h2 = 0.35) and genotypes. Lastly, the dairy cattle population had 40,800 pedigreed animals, of which 20,000 females had phenotypes (h2 = 0.32) and 2,400 males were genotyped. All phenotypes, pedigree, and genotypes were used in ssGWAA, whereas only genotypes and phenotypes were used in cGWAA and EMMAX for the fish and beef cattle analyses. For the dairy cattle analysis using the last two methods, deregressed proofs had to be used instead of phenotypes. The ability to correctly identify QTN and the number of statistically significant SNP (P < 0.05/number of SNP) was assessed among methods. In all populations, cGWAA was able to identify some of the strongest QTN but showed a large number of false positives. EMMAX and ssGWAA did not show false associations and correctly identified the top QTN, with more signals observed in ssGWAA. The ssGWAA accounts for population structure and is a proper association method, especially for livestock populations where sparse genotyping is a reality and phenotypes may not be recorded in genotyped animals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document