scholarly journals فاعلية حقيبة تعليمية إلکترونية لتنمية مهارات الرياضيات الحياتية لتلاميذ الدمج بالمرحلة الابتدائية ذوي الاحتياجات الخاصة في ضوء معايير ومؤشرات الجودة The effectiveness of an electronic educational bag to develop life math skills to primary school integration students with special needs in the light of quality standards and indicators

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-73
Author(s):  
إيفون عوض خليل ◽  
أ.د/ زينب أحمد عبد الغني خالد ◽  
أ.م.د/ ممدوح عبد الحميد إبراهيم
Šolsko polje ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol XXXI (1-2) ◽  
pp. 167-189
Author(s):  
Matej Rovšek

Between equity, quality and learning achievements in primary school One of the features of Slovenian primary school system is the parallelism of two groups of schools – regular ones and those for certain groups of students with special needs. This makes us one of the few countries (EASIE, 2018) to still have completely separated schools for just over 2% of students with special needs. Despite the fact that both types comprise the same educational system, which is, in most aspects, regulated by the same law, some groups of students with special needs do not have the possibility of schooling under the same roof. However, this is only a part of the topic we are going to discuss. The other one tackles the question of equity of schooling in regular schools – besides all other students, this mostly concerns those with special needs, those with mild intellectual abilities, Roma students as well as those with low socio-economic standards (SES). The equity of the Slovenian school system will be discussed in a wider context, not only in the case of gender, SES and nationality comparing learning achievements. The article is based on the assumption that the regular school of today is not adjusted to the developmental needs of most students. For the purpose of discussion, elements which comprise the school system, must be defined: some are either of systemic or curricular, or conceptual or pedagogic nature, such as: curriculum, standards of knowledge, different forms of internal and external assessment, placement of children with special needs etc. Despite all of these elements compromising to make a stable schooling system, they are not all coherent with the needs of today’s modern society and are, even more so, in contrast with the results of the neuro-science in education. Another category of equal opportunities within the question of school equity would, besides the SES, nationality and ethnicity, have to be that of different capabilities of students, regarding the unified (official) standards of knowledge. All of these elements also make it difficult for today’s school to become a school of diversity. A school which will support different students, regardless of their learning achievements, SES and other characteristics. A school where all the students could be successfully educated, those who are already in the regular schools as well as those who are still part of the segregated forms of education. The article will depict why the present school system is no longer suitable for the majority of students and will point to possible solutions. The key solution touches on the changes of curriculums and the concept of assessment, the changes of which also have an impact on all the other elements. The assumptions will be clarified by studying the connection of stated elements and data of the international studies such as the TIMSS and PISA study from 2018 and earlier as well as using other actual Slovenian studies. Key words: equity in education, children with special needs, curriculum, minimum standards of knowledge, assessments, learning achievements, cognitive science


1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Wright ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos

The present study surveyed teachers and students without disabilities regarding the inclusion of students with disabilities at an Australian primary school. The school provided special education to 35 students with special needs and some of their education was provided in regular classrooms alongside peers without disabilities. Fifteen regular classroom teachers and 109 classroom peers without special needs completed questionnaires. Both groups provided a range of supportive comments about regular classroom placements for student with special needs, but also expressed concerns about the implementation of special education in regular classrooms. Specific concerns included the extra time and added stress of educating children with special needs in the regular classroom setting, potential disruption and disadvantage to other students and the lack of support and resources. Unless these concerns are addressed, placement of students with special needs in regular classrooms may generate stress, concern, and even possibly resentment among some teachers and students without disabilities.


1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
Susan Wright ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos

The present study surveyed the views of parents about the education of students with special needs in regular classrooms. The survey involved 81 parents of students without disabilities and 29 parents of students with special needs. The children attended an Australian primary school. The school provided special education to 35 students with special needs and some of their education was provided in regular classrooms. Both groups of parents provided a range of supportive comments, but also expressed concerns about the implementation of special education in regular classrooms. Specific concerns included the extra time and added stress of educating children with special needs in the regular classroom, the potential disruption and disadvantage to other students, and the lack of support and resources, which may decrease the amount of learning. These views are consistent with those expressed by teachers and students without special needs as reported in the companion paper (Wright & Sigafoos, 1997) to the present study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-357
Author(s):  
Eka Tusyana ◽  
Wina Calista

The research aim is to describe the integration of among systems in inclusive education at Taman Muda Ibu Pawiyatan Primary School Yogyakarta. This research utilized case study method with a qualitative approach. The data collection instruments were interview, observation, and documentation. The result indicates that among systems in inclusive education at Taman Muda Ibu Pawiyatan Primary School Yogyakarta is integrated into classroom and outing class learning activities. Among system in the classroom learning activity is integrated by teachers to not only provide material but also advise and habituation to students such as maintaining a good attitude to peers. Teachers apply the jigsaw method in learning, which is aimed to train regular students or students with special needs to implement the attitudes of being responsible, cooperative, and respecting other people’s opinions. Teachers do not demand students with special needs to compare their ability with regular children to achieve scores based on Minimum Criteria of Mastery Learning (or usually called Kriterai Ketuntasan Minimal/KKM). They open the opportunity to students, especially they who have special needs at inclusive school to train their independence without continuously depending on guardian. In the among the system of outing class learning, teachers apply three systems, which are karawitan (playing a java musical instrument), dance art, and scout.


Author(s):  
Dian Eka Susanti ◽  
Agus Ramdani ◽  
Dadi Setiadi

The aim of the study was to describe the planning of inclusive education programs in primary school 20 of Mataram. The study used a qualitative approach and was conducted at Elementary School 20 Mataram. Data sources used are primary data and secondary data. The data validity test in this study includes the credibility, reliability, and validity tests. The results showed that the planning carried out by Elementary School 20 Mataram was carried out by establishing an annual work program with student activities for a year, including students with special needs, these activities include identification and evaluation of students at the time of registration of new students, meetings of routine parents of children with special needs and schools, class promotion meetings, extracurricular exercises, training of managers of children with special needs, the composition of individual learning programs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. p103
Author(s):  
Feng -Xia ◽  
Yuzhen -Xu ◽  
Li -Jiang

With the implementation of inclusive education, students with special needs, such as learning disabilities, emotional & behavioral disorders, speech & language disabilities, autism, and gifted children, are in need of professional support. In the future, inclusive education will focus on compulsory education and continuously extend to early intervention and eldly service until lifelong education. Based on the overall education goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development issued by the United Nations Development Summit, Shanghai Changning District has carried out a practical exploration from mainstreaming to lifelong inclusive education, with the concept of “universal, inclusive and lifelong”, has developed and implemented support programs, providing “group”, “categories” and “individual” support for school-age, preschool and post-school-age students with special needs, developed and implemented 37 transition service programs including five stages: from home to kinder garden, from kindergarten to primary school, from primary school to junior middle school, from junior middle school to special vocational school; after special vocational school.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document