scholarly journals Surgical Margins and Lymphoid Infiltrate in Cholangiocarcinoma: When a Surgical Technique "Pushes" Tumor Biology to Provide Answer

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Guido Torzilli ◽  
Luca Vigano
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Georgios S. Markopoulos ◽  
Georgios K. Glantzounis ◽  
Anna C. Goussia ◽  
Georgios D. Lianos ◽  
Anastasia Karampa ◽  
...  

Liver resection is the main treatment for primary and metastatic liver tumors in order to achieve long-term survival with good quality of life. The ultimate goal of surgical oncology is to achieve complete tumor removal with adequate clear surgical margins. Flow cytometry is a powerful analytical technique with applications such as phenotypic analysis and quantification of DNA content. Intraoperative flow cytometry (iFC) is the application of flow cytometry for DNA content/ploidy and cell cycle distribution analysis during surgery for tumor cell analysis and margin evaluation. It has been used for cell analysis of intracranial tumors and recently of head and neck carcinomas and breast carcinomas, as well as for tumor margin evaluation. Herein, we present a novel touch imprint iFC protocol for the detailed assessment of tumor margins during excision of malignant hepatic lesions. The protocol aims to offer information on surgical margins after removal of malignant liver tumors based on DNA content of cancer cells and to corroborate the results of iFC with that of histopathological analysis. Based on the established role of iFC in other types of malignancies, our specialized protocol has the potential, through characterization of cells in liver transection surface post hepatectomy, to offer significant information on the type of resection and tumor biology. This information can be used to effectively guide intra- and postoperative patient management.


Author(s):  
Stephen R. Grobmyer ◽  
Michael S. Cowher ◽  
Joseph P. Crowe

There has been, and continues to be, significant controversy over the definition of an “optimal” surgical margin in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The historic basis of this controversy stems from the original trials documenting the safety of BCT and many conflicting retrospective studies that have sought to define the association between surgical margin width and outcomes over the last 20 years. It is important to understand that margin assessment is an inexact science, and current laboratory approaches to surgical-margin assessment represent only a sampling of the surgical margin. Currently available evidence suggests that decisions regarding surgical margins in BCT should be made in the context of what is known about the biology of breast cancer, as well the interactions of tumor biology, adjuvant treatment for breast cancer, and outcomes. Achieving consensus on management of surgical margins in BCT should be a clinical priority as it offers the opportunity to reduce the burden of breast cancer treatment on patients without compromising cancer-related outcomes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Sorokin ◽  
Michael A. Feuerstein ◽  
Paul Feustel ◽  
Ronald P. Kaufman

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1821-1829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Antonios Margonis ◽  
Kazunari Sasaki ◽  
Yuhree Kim ◽  
Mario Samaha ◽  
Stefan Buettner ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 270-270
Author(s):  
Robert A. Linden ◽  
Adeep Thumar ◽  
Danny Haddad ◽  
Steve N. Dong ◽  
Leonard G. Gomella ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 158-158
Author(s):  
Stephana Larre ◽  
Laurent Salomon ◽  
Alexandre De La Taille ◽  
Yves Allory ◽  
Andras Hoznek ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
David I. Lee ◽  
Justin T. Lee ◽  
David Shepherd ◽  
Harrison M. Abrahams

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 544-544
Author(s):  
Mireia Musquera ◽  
Anna Agud ◽  
Lluis Peri ◽  
Maria Jose Ribal ◽  
Federico Oppenheimer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document