scholarly journals Full-scale experience with the membrane bioreactor-reverse osmosis water reclamation process

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen T. Daigger ◽  
Andrew Hodgkinson ◽  
Peter Skeels ◽  
Jenine Smith ◽  
James Lozier ◽  
...  

The Gippsland Water Factory (GWF), owned and operated by Gippsland Water in south eastern Australia, is a 35,000 m3/day water reclamation facility which treats 16,000 m3/day of domestic wastewater and 19,000 m3/day of industrial (pulp and paper) wastewater through parallel membrane-bioreactor (MBR)-based treatment trains prior to discharge to the Pacific Ocean via the Regional Outfall Sewer. A portion of the domestic train MBR effluent is further treated through a chloramination and reverse osmosis (RO) system for reclamation, as needed to augment the regional water supply, and is supplied to Australia Paper, the source of the industrial wastewater treated at the GWF. While use of the MBR/RO combination for water reclamation is expected to provide advantages, little full-scale experience exists. Consequently, this paper reports operational and performance results for the first four years of operation for the MBR/RO water reclamation train. Details are provided, not only on process performance, but also on the resolution of equipment and plant performance issues along with ongoing plant optimization. On the basis of these operating results, it is concluded that the combination of MBR and RO is a reliable and robust option for producing high-quality reclaimed water from municipal wastewater.

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 589-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Niwa ◽  
R. Yin ◽  
M. H. Oo ◽  
H. Noguchi ◽  
T. Watanabe ◽  
...  

Abstract Application of membrane technology for water reclamation has grown significantly in recent years due to reduced footprint size and more consistent product water quality. For a membrane bioreactor (MBR) system, it is critical for it to be robust to allow membrane systems to operate at higher flux without significant increase of trans-membrane pressure (TMP). A full-scale ceramic MBR system was installed at Changi Water Reclamation Plant (CWRP) as part of an MBR retrofit project to increase treatment capacity without expanding the plant's footprint. The nominal capacity of the ceramic MBR system is 15,000 m3/d. The system has been successfully operating since January 2017 with a net flux of 30–60 L/m2-hr (LMH). Stable operation was observed at nominal production capacity for more than 3 months. During that period, the TMP was stable in the range of 9–14 kPa for Tank A and 10–17 kPa for Tank B. Permeate turbidity was recorded in the range of 0.04–0.06 NTU for both Tank A and Tank B.


2009 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 3121-3127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halil Hasar ◽  
Ubeyde Ipek ◽  
Cumali Kinaci

Young leachate was a high strength wastewater with regard to carbon and nitrogen matter, and up to now many researchers have focused on a number of treatment methods to treat the leachate. By using various treatment processes, joint treatment of leachate with domestic wastewater, resulted from same community, is one of the most significant methods because domestic wastewater has either larger mass or lower strength than leachate. In this study, a submerged membrane bioreactor (sMBR) was used for treatment of blending wastewater, including differential mixture ratios of domestic wastewater and leachate. In raw leachate, BOD5/COD was between 0.40 and 0.67 and total phosphorus was between 17 and 24 mg/l. After the leachate was blended with domestic wastewater in the ratios of 1/5–1/20, the influent COD decreased from 8,500–14,200 mg/l to 750–2,400 mg/l as ammonium decreased from 1,100–2,150 mg/l to 30–180 mg/l. The sMBR, which was aerated intermittently, accomplished both COD oxidation and nutrient removal at optimal conditions without adding the external phosphorus source, providing < 15 mg COD/l, <1.3 mg NH4+-N/l, and <2.0 mg P/l on average at solid retention times (SRT) higher than 10 days. Consequently, the results showed the mixture of leachate and domestic wastewater could be an acceptable alternative by means of membrane bioreactor technology.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 (8) ◽  
pp. 6918-6928
Author(s):  
Richard G. Huggins ◽  
Jörg E. Drewes ◽  
Tzahi Y. Cath ◽  
Lloyd W. Johnson

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1520-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H.-W. Kuo ◽  
Fredrick J. Simmons ◽  
Scott Blair ◽  
Elizabeth Hart ◽  
Joan B. Rose ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 414 ◽  
pp. 128645
Author(s):  
Bárbara Caroline Ricci ◽  
Gemima Santos Arcanjo ◽  
Victor Rezende Moreira ◽  
Yuri Abner Rocha Lebron ◽  
Konrad Koch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document