Response of an EBPR population developed in an SBR with propionate to different carbon sources

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pijuan ◽  
J.A. Baeza ◽  
C. Casas ◽  
J. Lafuente
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Source ◽  
Carbon Sources ◽  
Reducing Power ◽  
Substrate Uptake ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
P Release ◽  
Carbon Recovery ◽  
Biological Phosphorus ◽  
Substrate Uptake Rate ◽  
Acetate Butyrate

The effect of different carbon sources (propionate, acetate, butyrate and glucose) on an enhanced biological phosphorus removal biomass developed with propionate as the sole carbon source was studied. Firstly, a group of different cycle studies was carried out using each substrate independently and then, another cycle study was performed with a mixture of substrates. Propionate was found to be the substrate with the highest substrate uptake rate in both sets of experiments. It was also the volatile fatty acid (VFA) which required less reducing power and less P-release to be uptaken. Four different polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) monomers produced during the anaerobic phase were detected, and PHB, PHV and PH2MV were quantified. Significant differences in PHA composition were obtained depending on the carbon source. The carbon recovery ratio for the anaerobic phase was also evaluated. The lowest value observed among the different cycle studies was obtained for butyrate, while the highest value was obtained for acetate.

Comparison of sequentially combined carbon with sole carbon in denitrification and biological phosphorus removal

2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 251-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.S. Cho ◽  
K.-H. Ahn ◽  
A.H. Molof
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Carbon Source ◽  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biological Nutrient Removal ◽  
Aerobic Denitrification ◽  
Carbon Substrate ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
P Release ◽  
Tin Removal ◽  
Biological Phosphorus

The sequentially combined carbon (SCC) of methanol and acetic acid was used for the biological nutrient removal (BNR). Its BNR performance was compared with methanol or acetic acid as a sole carbon substrate. Compared to the sole carbon substrate, the use of SCC demonstrated the highest overall TIN removal of 98.3% at a COD ratio of 30 mg COD/l of methanol/50 mg CDO/l of acetic acid. Furthermore, denitrification was more enhanced when methanol was used as one of the SCC, rather than as a sole carbon source. Complete phosphorus removal was accomplished with a non-detectable o-P concentration when SCC was added. This research also showed that aerobic denitrifiers appear to prefer acetic acid to methanol, and the amount of poly-§-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) stored by P accumulating organisms (PAOs) using acetic acid in the anoxic zone could be another important factor in improving the aerobic denitrification. The SCC was a very favorable carbon source for the aerobic denitrification since acetic acid was utilized more efficiently for P-release in accordance with increase of PHB stored in the cell of PAOs by removing nitrogen first using methanol.

Full Scale Investigations on Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal – P-Release in the Anaerobic Reactor

1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 153-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Wedi ◽  
P. A. Wilderer
Keyword(s):  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Process Conditions ◽  
Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Anaerobic Reactor ◽  
P Release ◽  
Acinetobacter Sp ◽  
Biological Phosphorus ◽  
P Removal

Most of the fundamental processes responsible for enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) were obtained through laboratory tests under defined conditions with pure or enriched cultures. Acinetobacter sp. was identified as the most important group of bacteria responsible for bio-P removal. Full scale data showed, however, that laboratory results do not match full scale results well enough. There is a lack of data on the effects of sub-optimal process conditions such as inadequate availability of volatile fatty acids (VFA), high nitrate recycle, storm water inflow or low temperatures. In this paper the results of full scale experiments on P-release are presented and compared with theoretical values. Measurements at a full scale Phoredox-system showed a surprisingly low P-release in the anaerobic reactor. Only 4 to 10% of the phosphorus in the activated sludge was released in the bulk liquid. With laboratory batch-tests, a maximum of 20% of the P in the sludge could be released. It is assumed that under the prevailing process conditions either the fraction of Acinetobacter sp. was very small, or bacteria other than Acinetobacter sp. were responsible for the P-removal, or most of the phosphorus was bound chemically but mediated by biological processes.

Optimising the A/O cycle for phosphorus removal in a submerged biofilter under continuous feed

2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 503-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.F. Gonçalves ◽  
F. Rogalla
Keyword(s):  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Organic Substrate ◽  
P Element ◽  
Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
P Release ◽  
Continuous Feed ◽  
Biological Phosphorus ◽  
Total P ◽  
Selection Of

This work describes laboratory scale research about Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) in a submerged biofilter under Anaerobic/Oxic (A/O) alternation and continuous feed. Its main purpose is to detail the behaviour of the reactor throughout the anaerobic and the aerobic phases of the A/O cycle, to study the importance of the anaerobic phase in the selection of the EBPR bacteria in the biofilm and to evaluate the consumption and the importance of the organic substrate during the anaerobic phase. The mass balance over the Phosphorus (P) element indicates that long anaerobic phases (6 h) are more efficient than short ones (3 h) as a selector of EBPR bacteria in biofilms. In both comparisons, thespecific mass of P released in a 6 h period represents almost 50% more than the amount of P release in the shorter period (3 h). However, the presence of rapidly biodegradable COD in the influent of the anaerobic phase is a more effective selector, more important than the duration of the anaerobic phase: by doubling the amount of acetic acid in the influent, a similar 50% increase of P-release can be achieved at short anaerobic periods of 3 h. The effect of the strategy adopted in this study, focusing on selecting EBPR bacteria in biofilm, is shown by the P levels of 4% (total P/SST) in the sludge removed from the BF by backwashing in all periods.

Phosphorus release and uptake during start-up of a covered and non-aerated sequencing batch reactor with separate feeding of VFA and sulfate

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 840-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Wu ◽  
T. Hao ◽  
H. Lu ◽  
H. K. Chui ◽  
M. C. M. van Loosdrecht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sequencing Batch Reactor ◽  
Batch Reactor ◽  
P Uptake ◽  
Sulfur Cycle ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
P Release ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Uptake Rates ◽  
Biological Phosphorus ◽  
P Removal

This study explored a sulfur cycle-associated biological phosphorus (P) removal process in a covered and non-aerated sequencing batch reactor (SBR) fed with volatile fatty acid (VFA) and sulfate separately. During the 60-day start-up, both phosphate release and uptake rates increased, while poly-phosphate cyclically increased and decreased accordingly. The P-release and P-uptake rates were associated with VFA uptake and sulfate reduction. The average ratio of potassium to phosphate during the P-uptake and P-release was also determined to be 0.29–0.31 mol K/mol P, which is close to a reported value (0.33) for biological phosphorus removal. All this evidence confirmed there was biological P removal in this reactor, in which metabolism could be different from conventional biological P removal.

Combined denitrification and excess biological phosphorus removal in discontinuous operated biofilm systems

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 193-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Brandt ◽  
C. Sieker ◽  
W. Hegemann
Keyword(s):  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
P Uptake ◽  
Organic Substrate ◽  
Treated Wastewater ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
P Release ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Immobilized Biomass ◽  
Biological Phosphorus ◽  
P Removal

The sorption-denitrification-P-removal (S-DN-P) process combines biological excess P-removal (BEPR) and denitrification using immobilized biomass. The accumulation of denitrifying polyP organisms is achieved by sequencing anaerobic/anoxic conditions. The immobilized biomass is in alternating contact with primary treated wastewater (anaerobic sorption-phase) and nitrified wastewater (denitrification phase). In the sorption phase, P-release takes place and readily biodegradable organic substrate, e.g. volatile fatty acid, is taken up and stored by polyP accumulating organisms (PAO). In addition to this, other organic matter is physically/chemically adsorbed in the biofilm structures. In the denitrification phase, the biomass denitrifies the stored and adsorbed organic substrate and, at the same time, P-uptake and polyP formation occurs. This paper presents results of investigations at laboratory and half-technical scale. At laboratory scale different types of carriers were tested regarding their suitability for the S-DN-P-process. In half-technical scale a biofilter and a moving bed reactor (MBR) were tested. In the biofilter a stable removal of nitrate and phosphate was achieved. However, it was not possible to achieve similar results in the MBR process. Especially the release and uptake of phosphate showed no clear tendency although the uptake of acetate was good. Reasons for this could be the accumulation of glycogen accumulating organisms which impair the metabolism of PAO.

Effect of continuous addition of an organic substrate to the anoxic phase on biological phosphorus removal

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Meinhold ◽  
H. Pedersen ◽  
E. Arnold ◽  
S. Isaacs ◽  
M. Henze
Keyword(s):  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Phosphate Uptake ◽  
P Uptake ◽  
Organic Substrate ◽  
Organic Substrates ◽  
Biological Phosphorus Removal ◽  
P Release ◽  
Influence Of Substrate ◽  
Biological Phosphorus ◽  
P Removal

The continuous introduction of a biological phosphorus removal (BPR) promoting organic substrate to the denitrifying reactor of a BPR process is examined through a series of batch experiments using acetate as model organic substrate. Several observations are made regarding the influence of substrate availability on PHA storage/utilization and phosphate uptake/release. Under anoxic conditions PHB is utilized and phosphate is taken up, indicating that at least a fraction of the PAO can denitrify. The rates of anoxic P-uptake, PHB utilization and denitrification are found to increase with increasing initial PHB level. At low acetate addition rates the P-uptake and PHB utilization rates are reduced compared to when no acetate is available. At higher acetate addition rates a net P-release occurs and PHB is accumulated. For certain intermediate acetate addition rates the PHB level can increase while a net P-release occurs. Whether the introduction of BPR promoting organic substrates to the denitrifying reactor is detrimental to overall P-removal appears to be dependent on the interaction between aerobic P-uptake, which is a function of PHB level, and the aerobic residence time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document