Membrane bioreactor versus conventional activated sludge system: population dynamics of nitrifiers

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 417-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Manser ◽  
W. Gujer ◽  
H. Siegrist
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Community Composition ◽  
Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
Membrane Separation ◽  
Heterotrophic Bacteria ◽  
Microbial Community Composition ◽  
Laser Scanning Microscopy ◽  
Nitrifying Bacteria ◽  
Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge

Although membrane bioreactors have attracted increasing attention in recent years, little research has been undertaken on the influence of the membrane separation on the microbial community composition. This paper compares the startup behaviour and the performance of the subsequent eight months of a membrane bioreactor with a conventional activated sludge pilot plant. Both plants were operated in parallel at the same sludge age and treated the same domestic wastewater. The identification of the nitrifying community composition using fluorescent in situ hybridization revealed only minor differences between the two reactors for both ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Accordingly, both systems exhibited the same maximum nitrification rates. Confocal laser scanning microscopy showed that the aggregates formed by nitrifying bacteria were located mostly in the inner part of the flocs and were overgrown by heterotrophic bacteria. It is concluded that the membrane separation itself does affect neither the nitrifying community composition nor the nitrification performance. However, impacts on kinetic parameters are emphasized.

Combining fluorescent in situ hybridization (fish) with cultivation and mathematical modeling to study population structure and function of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wagner ◽  
Daniel R. Noguera ◽  
Stefan Juretschko ◽  
Gabriele Rath ◽  
Hans-Peter Koops ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Modeling ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Heterotrophic Bacteria ◽  
Sewage Treatment Plant ◽  
Laser Scanning Microscopy ◽  
Industrial Plant ◽  
Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria ◽  
Ammonia Oxidizers

16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for phylogenetically defined groups of autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria were used for analyzing the natural diversity of nitrifiers in an industrial sewage treatment plant receiving sewage with high ammonia concentrations. In this facility discontinuous aeration is used to allow for complete nitrification and denitrification. In situ hybridization revealed a yet undescribed diversity of ammonia oxidizers occurring in the plant. Surprisingly, the majority of the ammonia oxidizers were detected with probe combinations which indicate a close affiliation of these cells with Nitrosococcus mobilis. In addition, low numbers of ammonia-oxidizers related to the Nitrosomonas europaea - Nitrosomonas eutropha cluster were present. Interestingly, we also observed hybridization patterns which suggested the occurrence of a novel population of ammonia oxidizers. Confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed that all specifically stained ammonia oxidizers were clustered in microcolonies formed by rod-shaped bacteria. Combination of FISH and mathematical modeling was used to investigate diffusion limitation of ammonia and O2 within these aggregates. Model simulations suggest that mass transfer limitations inside the clusters are not as significant as the substrate limitations due to the activity of surrounding heterotrophic bacteria. To learn more about the ammonia-oxidizers of the industrial plant, we enriched and isolated ammonia-oxidizing bacteria from the activated sludge by combining classical cultivation techniques and FISH. Monitoring the isolates with the nested probe set allowed us to specifically identify those ammonia oxidizers which were found in situ to be numerically dominant. The phylogenetic relationship of these isolates determined by comparative 16S rDNA sequence analysis confirmed the affiliation suggested by FISH.

Comparison of nitrification performance and microbial community between submerged membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge system

2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 193-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Li ◽  
M. Yang ◽  
Y. Zhang ◽  
X. Liu ◽  
M. Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
Extracellular Polymeric Substances ◽  
Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Heterotrophic Bacteria ◽  
Nitrite Oxidation ◽  
Submerged Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge ◽  
Activated Sludge System ◽  
Gradient Gel Electrophoresis

A submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and a conventional activated sludge system (CAS) were compared in parallel over a period of more than 260 days on treating synthetic ammonia-bearing inorganic wastewater without sludge purge under decreased hydraulic retention times (HRTs). Conversion of NH4+-N to NO3--N was achieved with an efficiency of over 98% at an HRT ≥ 10 h in the SMBR, while similar performance was obtained at an HRT ≥ 20 h in the CAS. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified 16S rDNA was used to monitor variations of community structures in the two systems. With the prolongation of operation, the number of DGGE bands in the SMBR gradually increased from the initial 11 bands to the final 22 bands, whereas that in the CAS varied in a range between 13 and 183 Sequence analysis indicates that Nitrosomonas sp. and Nitrospira sp. were the dominating nitrification species responsible for ammonia and nitrite oxidation, respectively. Heterotrophic bacteria like Pseudomonas sp. and Flavobacteria sp. existed in both of the systems although only inorganic wastewater was fed. Substantive accumulation of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in the SMBR was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy and EPS analysis.

scholarly journals Do initial concentration and activated sludge seasonality affect pharmaceutical biotransformation rate constants?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara J. H. M. van Bergen ◽  
Ana B. Rios-Miguel ◽  
Tom M. Nolte ◽  
Ad M. J. Ragas ◽  
Rosalie van Zelm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Microbial Community ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Community Composition ◽  
Rate Constants ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Microbial Community Composition ◽  
Amplicon Sequencing ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Initial Concentration ◽  
Different Seasons

Abstract Pharmaceuticals find their way to the aquatic environment via wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Biotransformation plays an important role in mitigating environmental risks; however, a mechanistic understanding of involved processes is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential relationships between first-order biotransformation rate constants (kb) of nine pharmaceuticals and initial concentration of the selected compounds, and sampling season of the used activated sludge inocula. Four-day bottle experiments were performed with activated sludge from WWTP Groesbeek (The Netherlands) of two different seasons, summer and winter, spiked with two environmentally relevant concentrations (3 and 30 nM) of pharmaceuticals. Concentrations of the compounds were measured by LC–MS/MS, microbial community composition was assessed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and kb values were calculated. The biodegradable pharmaceuticals were acetaminophen, metformin, metoprolol, terbutaline, and phenazone (ranked from high to low biotransformation rates). Carbamazepine, diatrizoic acid, diclofenac, and fluoxetine were not converted. Summer and winter inocula did not show significant differences in microbial community composition, but resulted in a slightly different kb for some pharmaceuticals. Likely microbial activity was responsible instead of community composition. In the same inoculum, different kb values were measured, depending on initial concentration. In general, biodegradable compounds had a higher kb when the initial concentration was higher. This demonstrates that Michealis-Menten kinetic theory has shortcomings for some pharmaceuticals at low, environmentally relevant concentrations and that the pharmaceutical concentration should be taken into account when measuring the kb in order to reliably predict the fate of pharmaceuticals in the WWTP. Key points • Biotransformation and sorption of pharmaceuticals were assessed in activated sludge. • Higher initial concentrations resulted in higher biotransformation rate constants for biodegradable pharmaceuticals. • Summer and winter inocula produced slightly different biotransformation rate constants although microbial community composition did not significantly change. Graphical abstract

Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor

2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Sahar ◽  
M. Ernst ◽  
M. Godehardt ◽  
A. Hein ◽  
J. Herr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Membrane Fouling ◽  
Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
Sewage Treatment Plant ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Macrolide Antibiotics ◽  
Organic Micropollutants ◽  
Removal Rates ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge

The potential of membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems to remove organic micropollutants was investigated at different scales, operational conditions, and locations. The effluent quality of the MBR system was compared with that of a plant combining conventional activated sludge (CAS) followed by ultrafiltration (UF). The MBR and CAS-UF systems were operated and tested in parallel. An MBR pilot plant in Israel was operated for over a year at a mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) range of 2.8–10.6 g/L. The MBR achieved removal rates comparable to those of a CAS-UF plant at the Tel-Aviv wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) for macrolide antibiotics such as roxythromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin and slightly higher removal rates than the CAS-UF for sulfonamides. A laboratory scale MBR unit in Berlin – at an MLSS of 6–9 g/L – showed better removal rates for macrolide antibiotics, trimethoprim, and 5-tolyltriazole compared to the CAS process of the Ruhleben sewage treatment plant (STP) in Berlin when both were fed with identical quality raw wastewater. The Berlin CAS exhibited significantly better benzotriazole removal and slightly better sulfamethoxazole and 4-tolyltriazole removal than its MBR counterpart. Pilot MBR tests (MLSS of 12 g/L) in Aachen, Germany, showed that operating flux significantly affected the resulting membrane fouling rate, but the removal rates of dissolved organic matter and of bisphenol A were not affected.

Comparison Performances of Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Activated Sludge Processes on Sludge Reduction Induced byOligochaete

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (14) ◽  
pp. 3171-3180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuansong Wei ◽  
Renze T. van Houten ◽  
Arjan R. Borger ◽  
Dick H. Eikelboom ◽  
Yaobo Fan
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
Sludge Reduction ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge ◽  
Activated Sludge Processes

scholarly journals LCA of a Membrane Bioreactor Compared to Activated Sludge System for Municipal Wastewater Treatment

Membranes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 421
Author(s):  
Dimitra C. Banti ◽  
Michail Tsangas ◽  
Petros Samaras ◽  
Antonis Zorpas
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
Municipal Wastewater ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Municipal Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge

Membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems are connected to several advantages compared to the conventional activated sludge (CAS) units. This work aims to the examination of the life cycle environmental impact of an MBR against a CAS unit when treating municipal wastewater with similar influent loading (BOD = 400 mg/L) and giving similar high-quality effluent (BOD < 5 mg/L). The MBR unit contained a denitrification, an aeration and a membrane tank, whereas the CAS unit included an equalization, a denitrification, a nitrification, a sedimentation, a mixing, a flocculation tank and a drum filter. Several impact categories factors were calculated by implementing the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology, including acidification potential, eutrophication potential, global warming potential (GWP), ozone depletion potential and photochemical ozone creation potential of the plants throughout their life cycle. Real data from two wastewater treatment plants were used. The research focused on two parameters which constitute the main differences between the two treatment plants: The excess sludge removal life cycle contribution—where GWPMBR = 0.50 kg CO2-eq*FU−1 and GWPCAS = 2.67 kg CO2-eq*FU−1 without sludge removal—and the wastewater treatment plant life cycle contribution—where GWPMBR = 0.002 kg CO2-eq*FU−1 and GWPCAS = 0.14 kg CO2-eq*FU−1 without land area contribution. Finally, in all the examined cases the environmental superiority of the MBR process was found.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document