scholarly journals Successful Sodium Level Correction with a 3% Saline Bolus before Intermittent Hemodialysis for a Patient with Severe Hyponatremia Accompanied by Acute Kidney Injury

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miyuki Kodama ◽  
Daisuke Hirai ◽  
Seijiro Tsuji ◽  
Jaegi Shim ◽  
Mitsuteru Koizumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Sodium Level ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
Severe Hyponatremia ◽  
Saline Bolus

Indications for Dialysis in Acute Kidney Injury

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankit Patel ◽  
Kenneth B Christopher
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration ◽  
Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis ◽  
Low Efficiency ◽  
The Impact

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) can be used to support patient’s kidney function in cases of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, timing, modality, and dosing of RRT continue to remain in question. Recent studies have begun to provide data to help guide clinicians on when to initiate RRT, what form of RRT to use ranging from continuous venovenous hemofiltration (VVH) to intermittent hemodialysis, and the impact of high versus low-intensity dosing. Additionally, the risks associated with temporary vascular access with regard to thrombosis and infection, the impact of high efficiency and flux versus low efficiency and flux membranes, and options for anticoagulation in RRT for AKI are also discussed. This review contains 75 references.  Key words: acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, continuous venovenous hemodialysis, renal replacement therapy, venovenous hemofiltration, 

Intensity of Renal Support in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

2018 ◽  
pp. 221-226
Author(s):  
Eric Ehieli ◽  
Yuriy Bronshteyn
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
Replacement Strategy ◽  
Therapy Regimen ◽  
Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration ◽  
Multicenter Prospective Study

Patients with severe acute kidney injury who require renal replacement therapy have high mortality rates. Controversy exists over whether a mortality benefit occurs with use of a more intensive renal replacement therapy regimen. In this multicenter, prospective study, 1124 patients requiring renal replacement therapy for severe acute kidney injury were randomized to a more and a less intensive renal replacement therapy regimen and were followed for 60 days. There was no statistical difference in mortality at 60 days (53.6% intensive, 51.5% less intensive, P = 0.47) and no difference in kidney recovery or non-renal organ failure. Hypotension and electrolyte abnormalities were more common in the intensive renal replacement regimen. A less intensive renal replacement regimen (intermittent hemodialysis 3 times a week or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration at 20ml/kg/hour) was found noninferior to a more intensive renal replacement strategy (dialysis 6 times per week or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration at 35 ml/kg/hour).

scholarly journals Intermittent Hemodialysis For Patients With Acute Kidney Injury (AKI): Outcome In A Tertiary Level Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
Arun Sharma ◽  
Binod Karki ◽  
Ajay Rajbhandari
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Acute Gastroenteritis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Tertiary Level ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Level Hospital

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is the sudden loss of renal function with accumulation of nitrogenous waste compounds. In developing countries, community acquired AKI is common than AKI in hospitalized septic patients. With conservative management many patients recover renal function however few require renal support with intermittent Hemodialysis (HD). We conducted a study to find out the etiology and outcome of the patients presenting with AKI who required dialysis.METHODS: This is a descriptive follow up study of the patients who needed renal replacement therapy in the form of HD presenting to our Nephrology unit of the hospital over a period of two years. Patients were followed up for three months post discharge. Data were tabulated and analyzed using SPSS software.RESULTS: Total 50 patients were included in study with 67% male. The commonest etiologies were urinary tract infection (30%) and  acute gastroenteritis (24%).The mean creatinine at the time of nephrology consultation, maximum level and at the time of discharge were 6.5(SD± 2.62), 7.3(SD ±2.13) and 2.2(SD ±1.75) respectively. Uremia with anuria was the most common reason for the initiation of HD in 54% cases. The mean number of intermittent HD used was 3.36. Complete recovery was seen in 68%, death in 26% and CKD in 6%.CONCLUSION: UTI followed by acute gastroenteritis are the leading cause of AKI in our tertiary level hospital. Timely initiated renal replacement therapy in the form of intermittent HD could lead to substantial renal recovery in almost three fourth of patients.

scholarly journals Severe Hyponatremia Precipitated by Acute Urinary Retention in a Patient with Psychogenic Polydipsia

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
C. M. H. Hilton ◽  
L. Boesby ◽  
K. E. Nelveg-Kristensen
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Sodium Concentration ◽  
Water Intoxication ◽  
Water Restriction ◽  
Psychogenic Polydipsia ◽  
Severe Hyponatremia ◽  
Electrolyte Homeostasis

A woman in her late sixties presented with severe hyponatremia and acute kidney injury (AKI) as consequence of psychogenic polydipsia and acute urinary retention due to urinary tract infection. Urinary catheterization promptly drained 5.5 L of urine with resulting polyuria, leading to an initial swift raise in plasma (P) sodium concentration, disregarding the course of fluid resuscitation. After the polyuric phase, normal range P-sodium levels were reestablished by oral water restriction. Treatment with psychoactive drugs, e.g., zuclopentixol, may have contributed to the severity of the condition. There are few published reports regarding water intoxication and urinary retention, but none reflecting severe hyponatremia precipitated by acute urinary retention in a patient with polydipsia. By this report, we illustrate the detrimental consequences on water and electrolyte homeostasis of urinary retention and polydipsia resulting in acute water intoxication. The purpose of presenting this case is firstly to draw attention to the potentially fatal combination of polydipsia and postrenal acute kidney injury, where the kidneys are unable to correct the enormous excess water, then to focus on the difficulty in correcting hypervolemic hyponatraemia in the context of polyuria after relief of urinary retention, and finally, to point out that patients in treatment with antipsychotics may have further worsening of electrolyte derangement.

Peritoneal dialysis with a lower dosage versus conventional intermittent hemodialysis in acute kidney injury: A propensity-matched study

2020 ◽  
pp. 089686082097085
Author(s):  
Watanyu Parapiboon ◽  
Thosapol Chumsungnern ◽  
Treechada Chamradpan
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Risk Of Mortality

Background: Literature regarding the outcomes of lower dosage peritoneal dialysis (PD) in treating acute kidney injury (AKI) among resource-limited setting is sparse. This study aims to compare the risk of mortality in patients with AKI receiving lower PD dosage and conventional intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) in Thailand. Methods: In a tertiary center in Thailand, a matched case–control study using propensity scores in patients with AKI was conducted to compare the outcomes between lower PD dosage (18 L per day for first two sessions, weekly Kt/ V 2.2) and IHD (three times a week) from February 2015 to January 2016. The primary outcome was a 30-day in-hospital mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included dialysis dependence at 90 days. Results: Eighty-four patients were included (28 PD and 56 IHD). Patient characteristics were comparable between two treatment groups. Overall, the mean age was 58 years. Most of the patients were critically ill (87% need mechanical ventilator; mean acute physiological and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score: 25). The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was similar between the PD and IHD patients (57% vs. 46%, p = 0.36). The dialysis dependence rate was also comparable at 90 days. The risk of death among AKI patients was higher in those with respiratory failure, higher APACHE II score, and starting dialysis with blood urea nitrogen greater than 70 mg dL−1. Conclusion: Clinical outcomes, including risk of mortality and 90-day dialysis dependence among patients with AKI, appear to be comparable between lower dosage PD and IHD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document