Efficacy and outcomes of continuous peritoneal dialysis versus daily intermittent hemodialysis in pediatric acute kidney injury

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1681-1689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biswanath Basu ◽  
Tapan Kumar Sinha Mahapatra ◽  
Birendranath Roy ◽  
Franz Schaefer
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis

Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis Compared with Daily Hemodialysis in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 62-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Ponce Gabriel ◽  
Jacqueline Teixeira Caramori ◽  
Luis Cuadrado Martin ◽  
Pasqual Barretti ◽  
Andre Luis Balbi
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Acute Tubular Necrosis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Acid Base ◽  
Tubular Necrosis ◽  
Daily Hemodialysis ◽  
Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis

Background In some parts of the world, peritoneal dialysis is widely used for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in acute kidney injury (AKI), despite concerns about its inadequacy. It has been replaced in recent years by hemodialysis and, most recently, by continuous venovenous therapies. We performed a prospective study to determine the effect of continuous peritoneal dialysis (CPD), as compared with daily hemodialysis (dHD), on survival among patients with AKI. Methods A total of 120 patients with acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were assigned to receive CPD or dHD in a tertiary-care university hospital. The primary endpoint was hospital survival rate; renal function recovery and metabolic, acid–base, and fluid controls were secondary endpoints. Results Of the 120 patients, 60 were treated with CPD (G1) and 60 with dHD (G2). The two groups were similar at the start of RRT with respect to age (64.2 ± 19.8 years vs 62.5 ± 21.2 years), sex (men: 72% vs 66%), sepsis (42% vs 47%), shock (61% vs 63%), severity of AKI [Acute Tubular Necrosis Individual Severity Score (ATNISS): 0.68 ± 0.2 vs 0.66 ± 0.22; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II: 26.9 ± 8.9 vs 24.1 ± 8.2], pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen [BUN (116.4 ± 33.6 mg/dL vs 112.6 ± 36.8 mg/dL)], and creatinine (5.85 ± 1.9 mg/dL vs 5.95 ± 1.4 mg/dL). In G1, weekly delivered Kt/V was 3.59 ± 0.61, and in G2, it was 4.76 ± 0.65 ( p < 0.01). The two groups were similar in metabolic and acid–base control (after 4 sessions, BUN < 55 mg/dL: 46 ± 18.7 mg/dL vs 52 ± 18.2 mg/dL; pH: 7.41 vs 7.38; bicarbonate: 22.8 ± 8.9 mEq/L vs 22.2 ± 7.1 mEq/L). Duration of therapy was longer in G2 (5.5 days vs 7.5 days; p = 0.02). Despite the delivery of different dialysis methods and doses, the survival rate did not differ between the groups (58% in G1 vs 52% in G2), and recovery of renal function was similar (28% vs 26%). Conclusion High doses of CPD provided appropriate metabolic and pH control, with a rate of survival and recovery of renal function similar to that seen with dHD. Therefore, CPD can be considered an alternative to other forms of RRT in AKI.

Peritoneal dialysis with a lower dosage versus conventional intermittent hemodialysis in acute kidney injury: A propensity-matched study

2020 ◽  
pp. 089686082097085
Author(s):  
Watanyu Parapiboon ◽  
Thosapol Chumsungnern ◽  
Treechada Chamradpan
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Risk Of Mortality

Background: Literature regarding the outcomes of lower dosage peritoneal dialysis (PD) in treating acute kidney injury (AKI) among resource-limited setting is sparse. This study aims to compare the risk of mortality in patients with AKI receiving lower PD dosage and conventional intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) in Thailand. Methods: In a tertiary center in Thailand, a matched case–control study using propensity scores in patients with AKI was conducted to compare the outcomes between lower PD dosage (18 L per day for first two sessions, weekly Kt/ V 2.2) and IHD (three times a week) from February 2015 to January 2016. The primary outcome was a 30-day in-hospital mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included dialysis dependence at 90 days. Results: Eighty-four patients were included (28 PD and 56 IHD). Patient characteristics were comparable between two treatment groups. Overall, the mean age was 58 years. Most of the patients were critically ill (87% need mechanical ventilator; mean acute physiological and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score: 25). The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was similar between the PD and IHD patients (57% vs. 46%, p = 0.36). The dialysis dependence rate was also comparable at 90 days. The risk of death among AKI patients was higher in those with respiratory failure, higher APACHE II score, and starting dialysis with blood urea nitrogen greater than 70 mg dL−1. Conclusion: Clinical outcomes, including risk of mortality and 90-day dialysis dependence among patients with AKI, appear to be comparable between lower dosage PD and IHD.

scholarly journals Outcome of Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis in Patient with Acute Kidney Injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-168
Author(s):  
Amrit KC ◽  
Rahman Tanvir ◽  
Alam Muhammad Rafiqul ◽  
Ahmed A.H. Hamid ◽  
Noor Towhida
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Electrolyte Imbalance ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Tubular Necrosis ◽  
Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis

Background: Though peritoneal dialysis has several limitations, it is still used in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients as an alternative method of Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT), especially in low socioeconomic countries. Materials and Method: This study included thirty patients diagnosed as AKI. Peritoneal access was established through flexible Tenckhoff catheter for Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis (CPD) and 6-8 exchanges were done in 24 hours. Results: Among 30 patients mean age was (mean±SD) 49.93±14.42 years. Seven (23.33%) patients were hemodynamically unstable. The cause of AKI was drug induced in 6(20.7%), hypovolemia/Acute Tubular Necrosis in 6(20.0%), sepsis in 5(16.7%), heart failure in 2(6.7%) and 11(36.7%) had multiple causes. In initial presentation, mean serum creatinine was 683.42 μmol/L, and the number of sessions required for stabilization of serum creatinine was 7.5±1.43, sessions required for correction of hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis were 2.15±0.69 and 2.5±0.76 respectively. The delivered Kt/V urea was 1.95±0.14 weekly. Six (20.0%) patients had peritonitis, five (16.7%) had pericatheter leakage and four (13.33%) had catheter blockage. Among 30 patients, three patients (10%) had died, sixteen (59.3%) had recovery of renal function and rest did not recover renal function. Conclusion: CPD was effective for correction of metabolic and electrolyte imbalance.  

Laparoscopic versus open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion for the management of pediatric acute kidney injury

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Stack ◽  
Neil Price ◽  
Jane Ronaldson ◽  
Chanel Prestidge ◽  
William Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Catheter Insertion ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury

scholarly journals Current Concepts of Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury—Are We Ready to Translate Them into Everyday Practice?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3113
Author(s):  
Kinga Musiał
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Tubuloglomerular Feedback ◽  
Everyday Practice ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Functional Reserve ◽  
Renal Functional Reserve ◽  
Acute Kidney Disease ◽  
Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury

Pediatric acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children undergoing interventional procedures. The review summarizes current classifications of AKI and acute kidney disease (AKD), as well as systematizes the knowledge on pathophysiology of kidney injury, with a special focus on renal functional reserve and tubuloglomerular feedback. The aim of this review is also to show the state-of-the-art in methods assessing risk and prognosis by discussing the potential role of risk stratification strategies, taking into account both glomerular function and clinical settings conditioned by fluid overload, urine output, or drug nephrotoxicity. The last task is to suggest careful assessment of eGFR as a surrogate marker of renal functional reserve and implementation of point-of-care testing, available in the case of biomarkers like NGAL and [IGFBP-7] × [TIMP-2] product, into everyday practice in patients at risk of AKI due to planned invasive procedures or treatment.

scholarly journals ISPD guidelines for peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: 2020 Update (paediatrics)

2021 ◽  
pp. 089686082098212
Author(s):  
Peter Nourse ◽  
Brett Cullis ◽  
Fredrick Finkelstein ◽  
Alp Numanoglu ◽  
Bradley Warady ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Continuous Flow ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Minimum Standard ◽  
Acceptable Alternative ◽  
Dialysis Solution ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Dialysis Solutions

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) for acute kidney injury (AKI) in children has a long track record and shows similar outcomes when compared to extracorporeal therapies. It is still used extensively in low resource settings as well as in some high resource regions especially in Europe. In these regions, there is particular interest in the use of PD for AKI in post cardiac surgery neonates and low birthweight neonates. Here, we present the update of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines for PD in AKI in paediatrics. These guidelines extensively review the available literature and present updated recommendations regarding peritoneal access, dialysis solutions and prescription of dialysis. Summary of recommendations 1.1 Peritoneal dialysis is a suitable renal replacement therapy modality for treatment of acute kidney injury in children. (1C) 2. Access and fluid delivery for acute PD in children. 2.1 We recommend a Tenckhoff catheter inserted by a surgeon in the operating theatre as the optimal choice for PD access. (1B) (optimal) 2.2 Insertion of a PD catheter with an insertion kit and using Seldinger technique is an acceptable alternative. (1C) (optimal) 2.3 Interventional radiological placement of PD catheters combining ultrasound and fluoroscopy is an acceptable alternative. (1D) (optimal) 2.4 Rigid catheters placed using a stylet should only be used when soft Seldinger catheters are not available, with the duration of use limited to <3 days to minimize the risk of complications. (1C) (minimum standard) 2.5 Improvised PD catheters should only be used when no standard PD access is available. (practice point) (minimum standard) 2.6 We recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to PD catheter insertion. (1B) (optimal) 2.7 A closed delivery system with a Y connection should be used. (1A) (optimal) A system utilizing buretrols to measure fill and drainage volumes should be used when performing manual PD in small children. (practice point) (optimal) 2.8 In resource limited settings, an open system with spiking of bags may be used; however, this should be designed to limit the number of potential sites for contamination and ensure precise measurement of fill and drainage volumes. (practice point) (minimum standard) 2.9 Automated peritoneal dialysis is suitable for the management of paediatric AKI, except in neonates for whom fill volumes are too small for currently available machines. (1D) 3. Peritoneal dialysis solutions for acute PD in children 3.1 The composition of the acute peritoneal dialysis solution should include dextrose in a concentration designed to achieve the target ultrafiltration. (practice point) 3.2  Once potassium levels in the serum fall below 4 mmol/l, potassium should be added to dialysate using sterile technique. (practice point) (optimal) If no facilities exist to measure the serum potassium, consideration should be given for the empiric addition of potassium to the dialysis solution after 12 h of continuous PD to achieve a dialysate concentration of 3–4 mmol/l. (practice point) (minimum standard) 3.3  Serum concentrations of electrolytes should be measured 12 hourly for the first 24 h and daily once stable. (practice point) (optimal) In resource poor settings, sodium and potassium should be measured daily, if practical. (practice point) (minimum standard) 3.4  In the setting of hepatic dysfunction, hemodynamic instability and persistent/worsening metabolic acidosis, it is preferable to use bicarbonate containing solutions. (1D) (optimal) Where these solutions are not available, the use of lactate containing solutions is an alternative. (2D) (minimum standard) 3.5  Commercially prepared dialysis solutions should be used. (1C) (optimal) However, where resources do not permit this, locally prepared fluids may be used with careful observation of sterile preparation procedures and patient outcomes (e.g. rate of peritonitis). (1C) (minimum standard) 4. Prescription of acute PD in paediatric patients 4.1 The initial fill volume should be limited to 10–20 ml/kg to minimize the risk of dialysate leakage; a gradual increase in the volume to approximately 30–40 ml/kg (800–1100 ml/m2) may occur as tolerated by the patient. (practice point) 4.2 The initial exchange duration, including inflow, dwell and drain times, should generally be every 60–90 min; gradual prolongation of the dwell time can occur as fluid and solute removal targets are achieved. In neonates and small infants, the cycle duration may need to be reduced to achieve adequate ultrafiltration. (practice point) 4.3 Close monitoring of total fluid intake and output is mandatory with a goal to achieve and maintain normotension and euvolemia. (1B) 4.4 Acute PD should be continuous throughout the full 24-h period for the initial 1–3 days of therapy. (1C) 4.5  Close monitoring of drug dosages and levels, where available, should be conducted when providing acute PD. (practice point) 5. Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis (CFPD) 5.1   Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis can be considered as a PD treatment option when an increase in solute clearance and ultrafiltration is desired but cannot be achieved with standard acute PD. Therapy with this technique should be considered experimental since experience with the therapy is limited. (practice point) 5.2  Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis can be considered for dialysis therapy in children with AKI when the use of only very small fill volumes is preferred (e.g. children with high ventilator pressures). (practice point)

Use of Peritoneal Dialysis in Acute Kidney Injury: How Far Away?

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 506-515
Author(s):  
Zhikai Yang ◽  
Jie Dong ◽  
Li Yang
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Injury

Indications for Dialysis in Acute Kidney Injury

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankit Patel ◽  
Kenneth B Christopher
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration ◽  
Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis ◽  
Low Efficiency ◽  
The Impact

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) can be used to support patient’s kidney function in cases of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, timing, modality, and dosing of RRT continue to remain in question. Recent studies have begun to provide data to help guide clinicians on when to initiate RRT, what form of RRT to use ranging from continuous venovenous hemofiltration (VVH) to intermittent hemodialysis, and the impact of high versus low-intensity dosing. Additionally, the risks associated with temporary vascular access with regard to thrombosis and infection, the impact of high efficiency and flux versus low efficiency and flux membranes, and options for anticoagulation in RRT for AKI are also discussed. This review contains 75 references.  Key words: acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, continuous venovenous hemodialysis, renal replacement therapy, venovenous hemofiltration, 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document