scholarly journals Assessment of underground coal gasification in bituminous coals: catalog of bituminous coals and site selection. Appendix A. National coal resource data system: Ecoal, Wcoal, and Bmalyt. Final report, Phase I. [Bituminous coal; by state; coal seam depth and thickness; identification]

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (20) ◽  
pp. 6533
Author(s):  
Magdalena Pankiewicz-Sperka ◽  
Krzysztof Kapusta ◽  
Wioleta Basa ◽  
Katarzyna Stolecka

One of the most important issues during UCG process is wastewater production and treatment. Condensed gasification wastewater is contaminated by many hazardous compounds. The composition of the generated UCG-derived wastewater may vary depending on the type of gasified coal and conditions of the gasification process. The main purpose of this study was a qualitative and quantitative characterization of the UCG wastewater produced during four different UCG experiments. Experiments were conducted using semi-anthracite and bituminous coal samples at two distinct pressures, i.e., 20 and 40 bar. The conducted studies revealed significant relationships between the physicochemical composition of the wastewater and the coal properties as well as the gasification pressure. The strongest impact is noticeable in the case of organic pollutants, especially phenols, BTEX and PAH’s. The most abundant group of pollutants were phenols. Conducted studies showed significantly higher concentration levels for bituminous coal: 29.25–49.5 mg/L whereas for semi-anthracite effluents these concentrations were in much lower range 2.1–29.7 mg/L. The opposite situation occurs for BTEX, higher concentrations were in wastewater from semi-anthracite gasification: 5483.1–1496.7 µg/L, while in samples from bituminous coal gasification average BTEX concentrations were: 2514.3–1354.4 µg/L. A similar relationship occurs for the PAH’s concentrations. The higher values were in case of wastewater from semi-anthracite coal experiments and were in range 362–1658 µg/L while from bituminous coal gasification PAH’s values are in lower ranges 407–1090 µg/L. The studies conducted have shown that concentrations of phenols, BTEX and PAH’s decrease with increasing pressure. Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed to enhance the interpretation of the obtained experimental data and showed a very strong relationship between three parameters: phenols, volatile phenols and CODcr.


2018 ◽  
Vol 223 ◽  
pp. 82-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fa-qiang Su ◽  
Akihiro Hamanaka ◽  
Ken-ichi Itakura ◽  
Wenyan Zhang ◽  
Gota Deguchi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 118-127
Author(s):  
Vasyl Lozynskyi

The purpose of this paper is substantiating of efficiency during application of borehole underground coal gasification technology based on target coal seam geology. Comprehensive methodology that included analytical calculation is implemented in the work. To determine the efficiency of coal seam gasification in faulting areas, an economic calculation method was developed. The obtained conditions of coal seam allow to provide rational order of mine workings. Conclusions regarding the implementation of the offered method are made on the basis of undertaken investigations. The obtained results with sufficient accuracy in practical application will allow consume coal reserves in the faulting zones using environmentally friendly conversion technology to obtain power and chemical generator gas, chemicals and heat.


2019 ◽  
Vol 291 ◽  
pp. 137-147
Author(s):  
Volodymyr Falshtynskyi ◽  
Roman Dychkovskyi ◽  
Pavlo Saik ◽  
Vasyl Lozynskyi ◽  
Victor Sulaiev ◽  
...  

The authors of the paper consider the concept of further prospective development of mining enterprises. The basis of this concept are scientific results obtained during the study of physical and chemical processes of solids conversion into the gaseous state: coal → gaseous fuels. It was established that the main base of development of mining regions is a mining power-chemical complex. The basic segment of which is a well underground coal gasification station. It is established that increase of indicators of efficient operation of the station from gasification is possible by synthesis of technical and technological decisions on the use of coal seam energy. When coal gasification is over, the gasifier passes into a mode of thermal generator with the use of alothermal technique to remove heat and thermic decomposition products from the degassed space of the gasifier. Generator gas at its initial temperature (1100 – 1300oС) around an underground gasifier creates a powerful heat boiler with a temperature regime of 200 – 300oС. It was established that at work of six gasifiers on a coal seam with thickness of 1.0 m with geometrical parameters each at a width of 30 m and at the length of 450 m energy-thermal power will be 237.8 MW. At the same time, additional energy resources can be obtained by involving segments of alternative forms of energy supply to the life cycle of the mining enterprise.


1975 ◽  
Vol 15 (05) ◽  
pp. 425-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.F. Magnani ◽  
S.M. Farouq Ali

Abstract This investigation focuses on mathematical modeling of the process of underground gasification of coal by the stream method. A one-dimensional, steady-state model consisting of five coupled differential equations was formulated, and the solution, extracted analytically, was used to develop closed-form expressions for the parameters influencing coal gasification. The model then was used for interpreting field performance curves, predicting the results of The performance curves, predicting the results of The field tests, and ascertaining the over-all process sensitivity to the input variables. The usefulness of the model was shown by establishing the parameters influencing the success or failure of parameters influencing the success or failure of an underground gasification project. Introduction One method of eliminating many of the technological and environmental difficulties encountered during the production of synthetic gas through aboveground coal gasification involves gasifying cod in situ. This process, known as underground coal gasification, was first proposed in 1868 by Sir William Siemens and is based on the controlled combustion of coal in situ. This in-situ combustion results in the production of an artificial or synthetic gas that is rich in carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and hydrocarbon gases. Despite the fact that reaction stoichiometry is a moot element of underground coal gasification, it is nonetheless believed thatcarbon dioxide is formed by the partial oxidation of coal,carbon monoxide is generated by the subsequent reduction of carbon dioxide, andthe hydrogen and hydrocarbon gases result from the water-gas reaction and carbonization of coal, respectively. To effect the controlled combustion of coal in situ, the coal seam first must be ignited and a means must be provided for supporting combustion (through injection of a suitable gasification agent) and producing the gases generated underground. Fig. 1 presents a schematic diagram of an underground gasification system that complies with these requirements. This approach to gasifying coal is known as the stream or channel method and necessitates drilling two parallel galleries, one serving as an injection gas inlet and the other as a producer gas outlet. These wells are then linked by a borehole drilled horizontally through the coal seam. Ignition occurs in the coal seam at the gas inlet and proceeds in the direction of flow. The combustion front thus generated moves essentially perpendicular to the direction of gas flow. perpendicular to the direction of gas flow.Since the technological inception of underground gasification, over 1,500 publications have appeared in the literature that bear testimony to the absence of a complete, legitimate, theoretical analysis of the underground gasification process. Given this observation, it is the basis of this paper that progress in underground coal-gasification research progress in underground coal-gasification research has suffered from the absence of "interpretative theory"; that is, it has suffered from a lack of logical, physical, and mathematical analysis of the governing and underlying aerothermochemical principles. The difficulties in formulating a principles. The difficulties in formulating a mathematical model adequately describing the numerous phenomena involved during coal gasification are indeed formidable. SPEJ P. 425


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document