Molecular and metabolic imaging of castration-resistant prostate cancer: state of art and future prospects

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Filippi ◽  
Agostino Chiaravalloti ◽  
Pietro Basile ◽  
Orazio Schillaci ◽  
Oreste Bagni
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Cellular Level ◽  
Molecular Probes ◽  
Metabolic Imaging ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Future Prospects ◽  
Castration Resistant

: Prostate cancer (PCa) represents the most common tumor in male and one of the most relevant causes of death in Western countries. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) constitutes a widely used approach in advanced PCa. When PCa progresses in spite of ADT and castrate levels of testosterone, the severe clinical condition termed as metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) takes place. The only approach to mCRPC has been represented by chemotherapy with taxanes for many years. Nevertheless, recently introduced treatments such as 2nd generation antiandrogens (i.e. enzalutamide and abiraterone), cell immunotherapy with sipuleucel-T or targeted alpha therapy with 223Ra-dichloride, have dramatically changed mCRPC prognosis. These novel therapies call for an unmet need for imaging biomarkers suitable for patients’ pre-treatment stratification and response assessment. In this scenario, nuclear medicine can provide several metabolic and molecular probes for investigating pathological processes at a cellular and sub-cellular level. The aim of this paper is to review the most relevant findings of the literature published to date on this topic, giving particular emphasis to the pros and cons of each tracer and also covering future prospects for defining personalized therapeutic approaches.

scholarly journals Impact of Extraskeletal Metastases on Skeletal-Related Events in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with Bone Metastases

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2034
Author(s):  
Soraia Lobo-Martins ◽  
Arlindo R. Ferreira ◽  
André Mansinho ◽  
Sandra Casimiro ◽  
Kim Leitzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Bone Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Multicenter Clinical Trial ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Therapeutic Landscape ◽  
Skeletal Related Events ◽  
The Impact

The therapeutic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has substantially evolved over the last decade. Nonetheless, a better understanding of bone-targeted agents (BTAs) action in mCRPC remains an unmet need. Theuse of BTAs aims to reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with mCRPC. Less frequent BTA schedules are currently being studied to minimize adverse events. In this study, the impact of metastatic compartment (bone and extraskeletal metastases (BESM) vs. bone-only metastases (BOM)) on bone biomarker kinetics, time to first on-study SRE, and symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) is evaluated. This is a retrospective analysis of the prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial of denosumab vs. zoledronic acid in patients with mCRPC and bone metastases. A total of 1901 patients were included, 1559 (82.0%) with BOM and 342 with BESM (18.0%). Bone metastases burden was balanced between groups. Baseline levels and normalization rates of corrected urinary N-terminal telopeptide and bone alkaline phosphatase did not differ between groups. However, BESM patients had a higher risk of SREs (adjusted HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.01–1.46; p = 0.043) and SSEs (adjusted HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.06–1.61; p = 0.014). This difference was more pronounced in the first 12 months of BTA treatment.In mCRPC, strategies of BTA schedule de-escalation may take into account presence of extraskeletal metastases.

Response assessment using [ 68 Ga]Ga‐PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer

The Prostate ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Grubmüller ◽  
Sazan Rasul ◽  
Pascal Baltzer ◽  
Harun Fajkovic ◽  
David D'Andrea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psma Ligand

scholarly journals Clinical Development of PARP Inhibitors in Treating Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob J. Adashek ◽  
Rohit K. Jain ◽  
Jingsong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Signaling Inhibitors

The approval of upfront abiraterone for castration-sensitive prostate cancer and the approval of enzalutamide and apalutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer have led to early utilization of potent androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors in treating advanced prostate cancer. There is an unmet need to develop novel therapies beyond targeting AR signaling for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) belong to a class of targeted agents being developed for the treatment of homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficient tumors. Olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, veliparib, and talazoparib were evaluated in early phase trials as a monotherapy for HRR-deficient mCRPC. Among them, olaparib and rucaparib have breakthrough designations for BRCA1/2-mutated mCRPC. Phase II studies also reported clinical activity of the PARPi and abiraterone combination and the PARPi checkpoint inhibitor combination in HRR-intact mCRPC. Ongoing phase III trials are testing these combinations as frontline or later line treatments for mCRPC. This review summarizes the critical clinical data as well as ongoing clinical trials for developing PARPi in treating mCRPC.

scholarly journals The Current Landscape of Treatment in Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117955491983392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joelle El-Amm ◽  
Jeanny B Aragon-Ching
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Early Data ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Fda Approval ◽  
Variable Potential

Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease with variable potential in developing into overt metastases. It is an area of increased unmet need in advanced prostate cancer and for which there had been no great treatments until recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of 2 novel anti-androgens apalutamide and enzalutamide, which were both approved given benefit in metastasis-free survival. Early data on the use of darolutamide, another novel anti-androgen, are also explored. This review discusses the pivotal trials that led to the approval of apalutamide and enzalutamide in the nmCRPC setting and discusses the key promises and challenges with the use of these agents.

Tumor-directed PET imaging of metastases in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) using Zr-89 labeled antiprostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) antibody J591.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 164-164
Author(s):  
Jarett L. Feldman ◽  
Michael J. Morris ◽  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
David M. Nanus ◽  
Stephen Barnett Solomon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Pet Imaging ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Imaging Modalities ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
External Domain ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

164 Background: There is no standard imaging (SI) modality that specifically and accurately images prostate cancer (PC) metastases, hampering prognostication and response assessment. J591 is a humanized antibody that targets the external domain of PSMA. We have previously reported on the feasibility, PK and biodistribution properties of 89Zr-J591 in 10 patients (pts) (Pandit-Taskar et al, Eur J Nuc Med Img 2014). We now report on the targeting/accuracy in 50 pts with mCRPC. Methods: Following standard CT/MRI, bone scan (BS), and FDG PET imaging, 5 mCi of 89Zr-J591 was administered IV. 89Zr-J591 was imaged 6-8 days after injection. Positive (pos) scan findings were confirmed, where possible, with biopsies (bxs) in the following preference: concordant 89Zr-J591 and FDG pos, 89Zr-J591 and FDG mismatch, and a mismatch between SI and any PET. Results: Imaging: A total of 703 lesions in 50 pts were identified using all imaging modalities. Bone:538 total bone lesions were detected. 491(91%) lesions were present on J591 of which 99 were only evident by J591. BS identified 339 (63%), CT 301 (56%), and FDG 207 (38%). Soft Tissue: 165 total soft tissue lesions were detected. 90 (55%) were seen on J591 of which 17 were only evident by J591. CT identified 124 (75%) and FDG 88 (53%). Pathology:46 bx’s were evaluable (21 bone, 25 soft tissue) in 34 pts. Of the unique J591 lesions biopsied (bx’d), 5/7 were pos for PC. Bone: We bx’d 19 J591 pos lesions and 2 J591 neg sites. Overall, path concordance with J591 was: 89% true pos, 100% true neg, 11% false pos, and 0% false neg. Soft tissue: We bx’d 16 J591 pos lesions and 9 J591 neg sites. Of these, we found 88% true pos, 11% true neg, 13% false pos, and 89% false neg. Conclusions: J591 PET identifies additional disease in bone not seen using other imaging modalities. These lesions are highly likely to correspond to disease by bx. However, the tracer performed less well in soft tissue, with a high false neg rate. Clinical trial information: NCT01543659.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document