scholarly journals The Excellent Sukoharjo District in Inclusive Health Services for People with Disabilities

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 497-511
Author(s):  
Justin Parahita ◽  
Chriswardani Suryawati ◽  
Zahroh Shaluhiyah
Keyword(s):  
Health Service ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Community Health Center ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
Standard Operating ◽  
Policy Problems ◽  
Depth Interviews

Sukoharjo district has Regional Regulation Number 18 of 2017 concerning Persons with Disabilities including Inclusion Health Services Policy. Problems completed during the implementation included four aspects that determined the success of policy implementation, they were communication between organizations, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure ( standard operating procedures). Sukoharjo is the first district that has inclusive health service SOP. This research aims to analyze the implementation of the regional regulation which is an inclusive health service policy This qualitative research was conducted at Community Health Centers in Sukoharjo from May to December 2020. Data collection techniques were in-depth interviews, observation, and document study. Subjects consisted of 20 informants consisted of Community Health Center officers, staff of health office and social office, disability communities, and patients with disability. The results showed that the number of physiotherapist was insufficient, the budget for supplementary feeding and therapy equipment was insufficient, disability-friendly infrastructures in several community health centers still need repairment.

scholarly journals The Representation of Neonatal Emergency Obstetric Care Management Base (PONED) In Gorontalo District Tibawa Health Centers

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Franning Deisi Badu ◽  
Fitria Saleh
Keyword(s):  
Community Health ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Community Health Center ◽  
Emergency Obstetric Care ◽  
Obstetric Care ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Organizational Structures ◽  
Health Department ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Pregnancy And Childbirth

Background: Development of Community Health Centers capable PONED that is part of the MPS which began in 2009, beginning with the training of doctors, nurses and midwives as well as complementary facilities and infrastructure on the terms that have been set were expected to prevent and manage complications of pregnancy and childbirth so be able to reduce MMR and IMR. The purpose og this research is to find out information about the implementation of Emergency Obstetric Care and Neonatal Basic (PONED) in Tibawa Health Centers 2016. Methods: This Research used qualitative research was to obtain in-deph information (in-deph-Interview) on management of the implementation (PONED) in rural community of Tibawa Health Centers 2016 sample size consisted of three people, divided into key informants and common informant. Results: PONED own with good planning, because the planning has been carried out every year. Organizing PONED has made the division of tasks and organizational structures that standard. PONED implementation in the field still had shortcoming, for the reason that a trained midwife PONED not all exposed areas of training MPS (Management Pregnancy Saver). Supervision is good, because the leader oversight had been monitoring on a regular basis at the Community Health Center. Evaluation was good quality, because the health department regularly conducted supervision through the evaluation of SPM (Minimum Service Standards) which is done every three months and every year. Suggestion: The health department would be able to think of the addition of qualified helath professionals such as midwives are sufficient for basic emergency care and trained nurses. Keywords: Planning, Organizing, Implementing, Monitoring and Evaluation

scholarly journals QUALITY ANALYSIS OF HEALTH SERVICES IN PUSKESMAS X BASED ON IMPORTANCE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS METHOD

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-74
Author(s):  
Mustara Mustara
Keyword(s):  
Performance Analysis ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Quality Analysis ◽  
Staff Attitudes ◽  
Waiting Room

Community Health Centers is one of the leading units in providing health services to the community. Along with the increasing demands of the community for quality health services, the accredited Community Health Centers must always improve the quality of its services. This study aims to find out how the quality of health services is seen in terms of service aspects, staff attitudes, and room conditions and attributes that are considered important by patients to improved. This research is a quantitative descriptive method to the Importance Performance Analysis approach. The study population was registered patients and utilizing health services provided by the X Community Health Center. The sample in this study used a quota sampling technique with 101 respondents. Data collection instruments using a questionnaire. The analysis used is the suitability of performance with its importance to all attributes, then the attributes described in the quadrant Importance Performance Analysis. The results showed the service variables, staff attitudes, and room conditions were categorized according to the expectations of their level of importance. Puskesmas need to encourage officers to be empathetic towards patients who will seek treatment, provide answers to any questions asked, have a patient waiting room equipped with a seat, have a clean corner room, and have a clean and non-slippery floor.

Quality Evaluation of Health Services at Community Health Centers: through Accreditation Surveys in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1294
Author(s):  
Muhammad Tahir ◽  
Ridwan Amiruddin ◽  
Sukri Palutturi ◽  
Fridawaty Rivai ◽  
Lalu Muhammad Saleh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Services ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Quality Evaluation ◽  
Health Centers

“Do Their Own Thing”: Radical Health Care and the Fair Haven Community Health Center

2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e9
Author(s):  
Ezra S. Lichtman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Community Health Center ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Free Clinics ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Alternative Health

Radical health reform movements of the 1960s inspired two widely adopted alternative health care models in the United States: free clinics and community health centers. These groundbreaking institutions attempted to realize bold ideals but faced financial, bureaucratic, and political obstacles. This article examines the history of Fair Haven Community Health Care (FHCHC) in New Haven, Connecticut, an organization that spanned both models and typified innovative aspects of each while resisting the forces that tempered many of its contemporaries’ progressive practices. Motivated by a tradition of independence and struggling to address medical neglect in their neighborhood, FHCHC leaders chose not to affiliate with the local academic hospital, a decision that led many disaffected community members to embrace the clinic. The FHCHC also prioritized grant funding over fee-for-service revenue, thus retaining freedom to implement creative programs. Furthermore, the center functioned in an egalitarian manner, enthusiastically employing nurse practitioners and whole-staff meetings, and was largely able to avoid the conflicts that strained other community-controlled organizations. The FHCHC proved unusual among free clinics and health centers and demonstrated strategies similar institutions might employ to overcome common challenges. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print September 16, 2021: e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306417 )

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document