Ephrin Receptor B2 Expression May Be a Prognostic Marker for Patients With Cancer: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 4309-4317
Author(s):  
HYUN MIN KOH ◽  
CHANG LIM HYUN ◽  
BO GUN JANG ◽  
HYUN JU LEE
1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (02) ◽  
pp. 368-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Barbul ◽  
G Finazzi ◽  
A Grassi ◽  
R Marchioli

SummaryHematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) are largely used in patients with cancer undergoing cytotoxic treatment to accelerate neutrophil recovery and decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia. Clinical practice guidelines for their use have been recently established (1), taking into account clinical benefit, but also cost and toxicity. Vascular occlusions have been recently reported among the severe reactions associated with the use of CSFs, in anedoctal case reports (2, 3), consecutive case series (4) and randomized clinical trial (5, 6). However, the role of CSFs in the pathogenesis of thrombotic complications is difficult to ascertain, because pertinent data are scanty and widely distributed over a number of heterogenous investigations. We report here a systematic review of relevant articles, with the aims to estimate the prevalence of thrombosis associated with the use of CSFs and to assess if this rate is significantly higher than that observed in cancer patients not receiving CSFs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 1389-1400
Author(s):  
Xingxia Zhang ◽  
Xinrong Chen ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Yanjie Hu ◽  
Ka Li

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengjie Sun ◽  
Huiyu Dong ◽  
Tao Yan ◽  
Junchen Li ◽  
Bianjiang Liu ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 145 (3) ◽  
pp. 540-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Binder ◽  
Ignacio M. Seropian ◽  
Michael C. Kontos ◽  
Benjamin W. Van Tassell ◽  
Giuseppe G.L. Biondi-Zoccai ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Xiang Qi ◽  
Feng Lin ◽  
Yuan-jue Sun ◽  
Li-Na Tang ◽  
Ai-Na He ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1938476
Author(s):  
Defeng Kong ◽  
Wen Zhang ◽  
Zhenrong Yang ◽  
Guoliang Li ◽  
Shujun Cheng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-003065
Author(s):  
Lewis Thomas Hughes ◽  
David Raftery ◽  
Paul Coulter ◽  
Barry Laird ◽  
Marie Fallon

PurposeOpioids are recommended for moderate-to-severe cancer pain; however, in patients with cancer, impaired hepatic function can affect opioid metabolism. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for the use of opioids in patients with cancer with hepatic impairment.MethodsA systematic review was conducted and the following databases searched: AMED (−2021), MEDLINE (−2021), EMBASECLASSIC + EMBASE (−2021) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (−2021). Eligible studies met the following criteria: patients with cancer-related pain, taking an opioid (as defined by the WHO Guidelines for the pharmacological and radiotherapeutic management of cancer pain in adults and adolescents); >18 years of age; patients with hepatic impairment defined using recognised or study-defined definitions; clinical outcome hepatic impairment related; and primary studies. All eligible studies were appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.ResultsThree studies (n=95) were eligible but heterogeneity meant meta-analysis was not possible. Each individual study focused on only one each of oxycodone±hydrocotarnine, oxycodone/naloxone and morphine. No recommendations could be formulated on the preferred opioid in patients with hepatic impairment.ConclusionsMorphine is the preferred opioid in hepatic impairment owing to clinical experience and pharmacokinetics. This review, however, found little clinical evidence to support this. Dose adjustments of morphine and the oxycodone formulations reviewed remain necessary in the absence of quality evidence. Overall, the quality of existing evidence on opioid treatments in cancer pain and hepatic impairment is low and there remains a need for high-quality clinical studies examining this.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document