scholarly journals The Elusive Path Toward Measuring Health Outcomes: Lessons Learned From a Pseudo-Randomized Controlled Trial of a Large-Scale Mobile Health Initiative

10.2196/14668 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e14668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Mechael ◽  
Nadi Nina Kaonga ◽  
Subhashini Chandrasekharan ◽  
Muthu Perumal Prakash ◽  
Joanne Peter ◽  
...  

Mobile health (mHealth) offers new opportunities to improve access to health services and health information. It also presents new challenges in evaluating its impact, particularly in linking the use of a technology intervention that aims to improve health behaviors with the health outcomes that are impacted by changed behaviors. The availability of data from a multitude of sources (paper-based and electronic) provides the conditions to facilitate making stronger connections between self-reported data and clinical outcomes. This commentary shares lessons and important considerations based on the experience of applying new research frameworks and incorporating maternal and child health records data into a pseudo-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of mMitra, a stage-based voice messaging program to improve maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes in urban slums in India.

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 1498-1501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ritabelle Fernandes ◽  
Chuan C. Chinn ◽  
Dongmei Li ◽  
Timothy Halliday ◽  
Timothy B. Frankland ◽  
...  

Purpose: The Hawaii Patient Reward and Incentives to Support Empowerment (HI-PRAISE) project examined the impact of financial incentives on Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes. Design: Observational pre–post study and randomized controlled trial (RCT). Setting: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and Hawaii Kaiser Permanente. Participants: The observational study included 2003 Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes from FQHCs. The RCT included 320 participants from Kaiser Permanente. Intervention: Participants could earn up to $320/year of financial incentives for a minimum of 1 year. Measures: (1) Clinical outcomes of change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pressure, and cholesterol; (2) compliance with American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards of diabetes care; and (3) cost effectiveness. Analysis: Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess differences in clinical outcomes. General linear models were utilized to estimate the medical costs per patient/day. Results: Changes in clinical outcomes in the observational study were statistically significant. Mean HbA1c decreased from 8.56% to 8.24% ( P < .0001) and low-density lipoprotein decreased from 106.17 mg/dL to 98.55 mg/dL ( P < .0001). No significant differences were found between groups in the RCT. Improved ADA compliance was observed. No reduction in total health cost during the project period was demonstrated. Conclusion: The HI-PRAISE found no conclusive evidence that financial incentives had beneficial effect on diabetes clinical outcomes or cost saving measures.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e0119772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rintaro Mori ◽  
Naohiro Yonemoto ◽  
Hisashi Noma ◽  
Tumendemberel Ochirbat ◽  
Emma Barber ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Paladino ◽  
Janeane N. Anderson ◽  
Rebecca A. Krukowski ◽  
Teresa Waters ◽  
Mehmet Kocak ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Long-term use of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) among women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer significantly reduces the risk of hospitalizations, cancer recurrence, and mortality. AET is associated with adverse symptoms that often result in poor adherence. A web-enabled app offers a novel way to communicate and manage symptoms for women on AET. In a region with significant racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes, our study tests the impact of a web-enabled app that collects and transmits patient-reported symptoms to healthcare teams to facilitate timely and responsive symptom management on medication adherence. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, we randomize 300 patients initiating AET to one of three arms: 1) an “App” group (n = 100) that receives weekly reminders to use the THRIVE study app; 2) an “App+Feedback” group (n = 100) that receives weekly reminders and tailored feedback based on their use of the app; or 3) a “Usual Care” group (n = 100) that receives usual care only. Participants are stratified by race: 50% White and 50% Black. The duration of the intervention is six months following enrollment, and outcomes are assessed at 12-months. The primary outcome is adherence, which is captured using an electronic monitoring pillbox. Secondary outcomes include symptom burden, quality of life, self-efficacy for managing symptoms, and healthcare costs. We also evaluate the impact of the intervention on racial disparities in adherence. Data are derived from three sources: electronic health record data to capture treatment changes, healthcare utilization, and health outcomes; self-report survey data related to adherence, symptom burden, and quality of life; and an electronic medication monitoring device that captures adherence. Discussion A successful web-enabled intervention could be disseminated across systems, conditions, and populations. By evaluating the impact of this intervention on a comprehensive set of measures, including AET adherence, patient outcomes, and costs, our study will provide valuable and actionable results for providers, policy makers, and insurers who strive to achieve the “Triple Aim” – reduce costs while improving health outcomes and the patient care experience. Trial registration NCT03592771. Prospectively registered on July 19, 2018.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document