scholarly journals Integrating Welfare Technology in Long-term Care Services: Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey Study

10.2196/22316 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. e22316
Author(s):  
Hanne Marie Rostad ◽  
Randi Stokke
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Home Care Services ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Welfare Technology

Background Welfare technologies are often described as a solution to the increasing pressure on primary health care services. However, despite initiating welfare technology projects in the health care sector and different government incentives, research indicates that it is difficult to integrate welfare technology innovations in a complex and varying setting, such as long-term care. Objective We aim to describe the types of welfare technology and the extent to which welfare technology is provided in long-term care (ie, nursing homes and home care services); examine whether the extent of welfare technology provision differs on the basis of municipal characteristics (ie, population size, centrality, the proportion of older inhabitants, and income); and identify how local governments (ie, municipalities) describe their efforts toward integrating welfare technologies in long-term care. Methods Quantitative and qualitative data about welfare technology from a larger cross-sectional survey about the provision of long-term care services in Norwegian municipalities were combined with registry data. Representatives of 422 Norwegian municipalities were invited to participate in the survey. Frequencies were used to describe the distribution of the types and extent of welfare technologies, whereas the Fisher exact test and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance were used to determine the association between the extent of welfare technology and municipal characteristics. Free-form text data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results A total of 277 municipalities were surveyed. Technology for safety was the most widespread type of welfare technology, whereas technology for social contact was the least prevalent. Two-thirds of the sample (183/277, 66.1%) in nursing home and (197/277, 71.1%) in home care services reported providing one or two different types of welfare technology. There was a statistically significant association between the extent of welfare technology and population size (in both nursing homes and home care services: P=.01), centrality (nursing homes: P=.01; home care services: P<.001), and municipal income (nursing homes: P=.02; home care services: P<.001). The extent of welfare technology was not associated with the proportion of older adults. The municipalities described being in a piloting phase and committing to future investment in welfare technology. Monetary resources were allocated, competency development among staff was initiated, and the municipalities were concerned about establishing collaborations within and between municipalities. Home care services seem to have a more person-centered approach in their efforts toward integrating welfare technologies, whereas nursing homes seem to have a more technology-centered approach. Conclusions Many municipalities provide welfare technologies; however, their extent is limited and varies according to municipal characteristics. Municipal practices still seem dominated by piloting, and welfare technologies are not fully integrated into long-term care services. Innovation with welfare technology appears top-down and is influenced by national policy but also reflects creating a window of opportunity through the organization of municipal efforts toward integrating welfare technology through, for example, collaborations and committing personnel and financial resources.

scholarly journals Integrating Welfare Technology in Long-term Care Services: Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanne Marie Rostad ◽  
Randi Stokke
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Home Care Services ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Welfare Technology

BACKGROUND Welfare technologies are often described as a solution to the increasing pressure on primary health care services. However, despite initiating welfare technology projects in the health care sector and different government incentives, research indicates that it is difficult to integrate welfare technology innovations in a complex and varying setting, such as long-term care. OBJECTIVE We aim to describe the types of welfare technology and the extent to which welfare technology is provided in long-term care (ie, nursing homes and home care services); examine whether the extent of welfare technology provision differs on the basis of municipal characteristics (ie, population size, centrality, the proportion of older inhabitants, and income); and identify how local governments (ie, municipalities) describe their efforts toward integrating welfare technologies in long-term care. METHODS Quantitative and qualitative data about welfare technology from a larger cross-sectional survey about the provision of long-term care services in Norwegian municipalities were combined with registry data. Representatives of 422 Norwegian municipalities were invited to participate in the survey. Frequencies were used to describe the distribution of the types and extent of welfare technologies, whereas the Fisher exact test and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance were used to determine the association between the extent of welfare technology and municipal characteristics. Free-form text data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS A total of 277 municipalities were surveyed. Technology for safety was the most widespread type of welfare technology, whereas technology for social contact was the least prevalent. Two-thirds of the sample (183/277, 66.1%) in nursing home and (197/277, 71.1%) in home care services reported providing one or two different types of welfare technology. There was a statistically significant association between the extent of welfare technology and population size (in both nursing homes and home care services: <i>P</i>=.01), centrality (nursing homes: <i>P</i>=.01; home care services: <i>P</i>&lt;.001), and municipal income (nursing homes: <i>P</i>=.02; home care services: <i>P</i>&lt;.001). The extent of welfare technology was not associated with the proportion of older adults. The municipalities described being in a piloting phase and committing to future investment in welfare technology. Monetary resources were allocated, competency development among staff was initiated, and the municipalities were concerned about establishing collaborations within and between municipalities. Home care services seem to have a more person-centered approach in their efforts toward integrating welfare technologies, whereas nursing homes seem to have a more technology-centered approach. CONCLUSIONS Many municipalities provide welfare technologies; however, their extent is limited and varies according to municipal characteristics. Municipal practices still seem dominated by piloting, and welfare technologies are not fully integrated into long-term care services. Innovation with welfare technology appears top-down and is influenced by national policy but also reflects creating a <i>window of opportunity</i> through the organization of municipal efforts toward integrating welfare technology through, for example, collaborations and committing personnel and financial resources.

scholarly journals Towards specialised and differentiated long-term care services: a cross-sectional study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanne Marie Rostad ◽  
Marianne Sundlisæter Skinner ◽  
Ragnhild Hellesø ◽  
Maren Kristine Raknes Sogstad
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Home Care Services ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Services

Abstract Background Numerous forces drive the evolution and need for transformation of long-term care services. During the previous decade, primary health care has assumed increased responsibility for developing and providing care services, but there is still limited knowledge about how European care service systems are evolving to address new tasks and patients. Based on data from Norwegian municipalities, this study aims to (1) describe the availability of specialised services in Norwegian nursing homes and home care services and (2) analyse whether structural factors, like population size and/or centrality, are associated with the availability of specialised services in nursing homes and home care. Methods This is a cross-sectional study of survey data. An online survey was designed specifically for this study. Its questions were developed from a comprehensive review of the literature and in partnership with a user panel. One representative from all of Norway’s 422 municipalities were invited to answer the survey from February to April 2019. In total, 277 municipalities completed the survey (response rate 66%). Chi-square analysis and Fisher’s exact test were used to test the associations between different categorical variables. Results Specialised care services were highly prevalent. For example, there were nursing home units specialising in dementia care (89%) and rehabilitation (81%) and home care teams for dementia care (79%) and reablement (76%). Approximately two-thirds of our sample were categorised as having high availability of specialisation in nursing home and home care services. The larger, more central municipalities had higher availability of specialisation compared to medium-sized and small, less central municipalities. Conclusions Our study indicates that a majority of nursing homes and home care services provide specialised and differentiated services that serve patient groups of different ages and diagnoses. Municipalities’ population size and centrality are associated with availability of specialised services in nursing homes and home care services.

scholarly journals Does context matter? Voluntary work in long-term care

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-180
Author(s):  
Laila Tingvold ◽  
Oddvar Førland
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Home Care Services ◽  
Voluntary Work ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Care Services

Introduction: Increased voluntary work in long-term care (LTC) is encouraged in white papers in Norway as well as in many other western states. This is due to the growth in the number of service recipients and a subsequent economic burden for the state. Voluntary work in nursing homes and home care services take place in different spatial contexts, but little attention has been paid to how the different contexts may potentially influence the possibilities for voluntary work. The aim of this study is to obtain new knowledge of the significance of context in recruitment of volunteers in LTC. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted among leaders in nursing homes and home services in 50 municipalities across all regions of Norway. Descriptive analysis was used. Results: According to the leaders, home care services had less voluntary work than nursing homes. Respondents from home care scored “poor flow of information” and “low interest in the municipality” as major hinderances, more so than respondents from nursing homes did. Discussion: Nursing homes typically have many residents under one roof following a similar schedule. Thus, volunteer-run activities are held more easily at set times and incorporated into the daily life of the institutions. On the other hand, home dwellers in home care stay in a more individualised setting with more autonomy and can opt out of activities that nursing home residents would normally join. Skill acquisition, networking and socializing are common motivations for volunteering, and a nursing home setting may be an easier context to obtain this. The governmental endeavour for increased voluntary work in LTC can be seen as an effort to meet expected rises in public expenditure. However, the realism can be debated due to substantial challenges on the future potential of volunteerism in LTC, especially in the home care context.

scholarly journals Hospital to Home: Supporting the Transition From Hospital to Home for Older Adults

2021 ◽  
pp. 084456212110443
Author(s):  
Brittany Barber ◽  
Lori Weeks ◽  
Lexie Steeves-Dorey ◽  
Wendy McVeigh ◽  
Susan Stevens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Home Care Services ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Hospital To Home

Background An increasing proportion of older adults experience avoidable hospitalizations, and some are potentially entering long-term care homes earlier and often unnecessarily. Older adults often lack adequate support to transition from hospital to home, without access to appropriate health services when they are needed in the community and resources to live safely at home. Purpose This study collaborated with an existing enhanced home care program called Home Again in Nova Scotia, to identify factors that contribute to older adult patients being assessed as requiring long-term care when they could potentially return home with enhanced supports. Methods Using a case study design, this study examined in-depth experiences of multiple stakeholders, from December 2019 to February 2020, through analysis of nine interviews for three focal patient cases including older adult patients, their family or friend caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Results Findings indicate home care services for older adults are being sought too late, after hospital readmission, or a rapid decline in health status when family caregivers are already experiencing caregiver burnout. Limitations in home care services led to barriers preventing family caregivers from continuing to care for older adults at home. Conclusions This study contributes knowledge about gaps within home care and transitional care services, highlighting the importance of investing in additional home care services for rehabilitation and prevention of rapidly deteriorating health.

Long‐term care services and care workers in Hangzhou City, China: A cross‐sectional survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1546-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaohua Hong ◽  
Ping Yu ◽  
Xueping Chen ◽  
Shiyu Qian
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Care Workers

scholarly journals Hospital to Home: Supporting the Transition from Hospital to Home for Older Adults

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany Barber ◽  
Lori Weeks ◽  
Lexie Steeves-Dorey ◽  
Wendy McVeigh ◽  
Susan Stevens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Home Care Services ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Hospital To Home

Abstract Background: An increasing proportion of older adults experience avoidable hospitalizations, and some are potentially entering long-term care homes earlier and often unnecessarily. Within Canada, approximately 10 percent of newly admitted long-term care residents could have potentially been cared for at home. Without adequate support from health care services to transition older adults from hospital to home, they often lack access to appropriate services when they are needed in the community thus making them more vulnerable to avoidable hospital visits, rapid deterioration of health, and earlier and unnecessary placement into residential long-term care. The purpose of this study was to collaborate with an existing enhanced home care program called Home Again in Halifax, Nova Scotia, to identify factors that contribute to older adult patients being assessed as requiring long-term care when they could potentially return home with enhanced supports. Methods: Through a retrospective case study design, we analyzed nine interviews for three focal patient cases including older adult patients, their family or friend caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Results: Findings indicate home care services for older adults are being sought too late, after hospital re-admission, or a rapid decline in health status when family caregivers are already experiencing caregiver burnout. Limitations in home care services ultimately led to barriers preventing family caregivers from continuing to care for older adults at home, such as absence of overnight services, a lack of information about home care services, and a lack of knowledge to navigate resources available. Conclusion: This study contributes knowledge about gaps within home care and transitional care services, highlighting the significance of investing in additional home care services for rehabilitation and the prevention of rapidly deteriorating health when older adults are discharged home after their first hospital visit. By understanding experiences and challenges of patients, family or friend caregivers, and healthcare professionals, we identified ways to reduce healthcare costs and improve the delivery and quality of home care services to better support older adult patients and their family or friend caregivers and to ensure hospitalized older adults are not unnecessarily admitted to nursing homes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document