scholarly journals An Innovative Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Glucose Excursions with the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Educate, Motivate, and Activate Adults with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: A Paradigm shift (Preprint)

JMIR Diabetes ◽  
10.2196/34465 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara K. Oser ◽  
Mark Cucuzzella ◽  
Daniel J. Cox ◽  
Marilyn Stasinopoulos ◽  
Matt Moncrief ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J Cox ◽  
Tom Banton ◽  
Matthew Moncrief ◽  
Mark Conaway ◽  
Anne Diamond ◽  
...  

Abstract This study aimed to compare conventional medication management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) to medication management in conjunction with a lifestyle intervention using continuous glucose monitoring to minimize glucose excursions. Thirty adults (63% female; mean age, 53.3 years) who were diagnosed with T2D for less than 11 years (mean, 5.6 years), had glycated A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 7.0% (51 mmol/mol) (mean 8.8%, [73 mmol/mol]), and were not using insulin, were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to routine care (RC) or 4 group sessions of glycemic excursion minimization plus real-time CGM (GEMCGM). Assessments at baseline and 5 months included a physical exam, metabolic and lipid panels, a review of diabetes medications, and psychological questionnaires. For the week following assessments, participants wore a blinded activity monitor and completed 3 days of 24-hour dietary recall. A subgroup also wore a blinded CGM. GEMCGM participants significantly improved HbA1c (from 8.9% to 7.6% [74-60 mmol/mol] compared with 8.8% to 8.7% [73-72 mmol/mol] for RC (P = .03). Additionally, GEMCGM reduced the need for diabetes medication (P = .01), reduced carbohydrate consumption (P = .009), and improved diabetes knowledge (P = .001), quality of life (P = .01) and diabetes distress (P = .02), and trended to more empowerment (P = .05) without increasing dietary fat, lipids, or hypoglycemia. Confirming our prior research, GEMCGM appears to be a safe, effective lifestyle intervention option for adults with suboptimally controlled T2D who do not take insulin.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng-fei Li ◽  
Bing-li Liu ◽  
Hong-hong Zhu ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Wen-li Zhang ◽  
...  

Objectives.We performed continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to define the features of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) before and after Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) therapy.Methods.This was a retrospective analysis. Newly diagnosed T2D patients (106) were admitted from eight centers in China. They were divided into a younger patient group (<60 years) and an older patient group (≥60 years). Each group was further divided into male and female patients. CSII therapy was maintained for 3 weeks after the glycemic target was reached. CGM was performed 2 times before and after completion of insulin treatment.Results.CGM data showed the expected significant improvement of mean amplitude glycemic excursion (MAGE) with CSII therapy. The older patients had lower hourly glucose concentrations from 0200 to 0700 o’clock compared to the younger patients at baseline. Surprisingly, in the older patient group, the male patients had a potential risk of hypoglycemia after CSII therapy, especially during periods from 2300 to 2400 and 0400 to 0600.Conclusions.Our data suggested that older male patients with newly diagnosed T2D may have lower nocturnal glucose concentrations. This may potentially increase the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia during CSII therapy. This study was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, numberCliCTR-TRC-11001218.


Diabetes Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. e71-e73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Cox ◽  
Ann G. Taylor ◽  
Matthew Moncrief ◽  
Anne Diamond ◽  
William S. Yancy ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 509-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penelope J. Taylor ◽  
Campbell H. Thompson ◽  
Natalie D. Luscombe-Marsh ◽  
Thomas P. Wycherley ◽  
Gary Wittert ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Bing-li Liu ◽  
Guo-ping Yin ◽  
Feng-fei Li ◽  
Yun Hu ◽  
Jin-dan Wu ◽  
...  

Objective. To compare the effect of the rapid-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs) aspart (NovoRapid) and lispro (Prandilin) on glycemic variations by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in patients within newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and metformin intensive therapy. Methods. This is a single-blind randomized controlled trial. A total of 110 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c%) above 9% was hospitalized and randomly divided into two groups: group Asp (NovoRapid group) and group Lis (Prandilin group). They all received CSII and metformin therapy. Treatments were maintained for 2-3 weeks after the glycaemic target was reached. C-peptide and insulin and fructosamine were determined. CGMS was continuously applied for 4 days after reaching the glycemic target. Results. There were no significant differences in daily dosages of insulin, fasting plasma C-P and 2 h postprandial C-P and insulin, and fructosamine at the baseline and endpoint between the groups Asp and Lis. No significant differences were seen in the 24 h mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), 24 h mean blood glucose (MBG), the standard deviation of the MBG (SDBG), fasting blood glucose, number of glycemic excursion (NGE), and the incidence of hypoglycemia between the two groups. Similarly, no significant differences were found in areas under the curve (AUC) of glucose above 10.0 mmol/L or the decremental area over the curve (AOC) of glucose below 3.9 mmol/L between the two groups. Conclusions. Lispro and aspart had the similar ability to control the glycemic variations in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR-IPR-17010338.


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 73-LB
Author(s):  
MARY L. JOHNSON ◽  
DARLENE M. DREON ◽  
BRIAN L. LEVY ◽  
SARA RICHTER ◽  
DEBORAH MULLEN ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document