scholarly journals Primary Care Providers’ Perspectives on Online Weight-Loss Programs: A Big Wish List

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin O Hwang ◽  
Heather L Stuckey ◽  
Monica C Chen ◽  
Jennifer L Kraschnewski ◽  
Samuel N Forjuoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Weight Loss Programs

scholarly journals A web-based intervention to increase weight loss treatment initiation: results of a cluster randomized feasibility and acceptability trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan A McVay ◽  
William S Yancy ◽  
Gary G Bennett ◽  
Erica Levine ◽  
Seung-Hye Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Behavioral Weight Loss ◽  
Weight Loss Treatment ◽  
Primary Care Patients ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract Evidence-based behavioral weight loss treatment is under-utilized. To increase initiation of treatment, we developed a single-session, online, primary care-based intervention (“mobilization tool”). We evaluated the mobilization tool's acceptability for primary care patients with obesity, trial design feasibility, and signal of an effect of the tool on treatment initiation. In this cluster randomized feasibility trial, primary care providers (PCPs) were randomized to a mobilization tool or comparator tool arm. Patients with obesity and a scheduled appointment with a randomized PCP were assigned to complete the mobilization or comparator tool prior to their appointment. The online mobilization tool asks patients to answer questions about a variety of weight-related topics and then provides automated, tailored feedback that addresses psychosocial determinants of weight loss treatment initiation. The comparator tool provided a nontailored description of treatments. All participants were offered free enrollment in behavioral weight loss treatments. Six PCPs were randomized. Sixty patients (57% female; 66% white; aged 55 ± 13 years) participated in this study of 296 contacted for eligibility evaluation (20.2%). Six-month follow-up assessments were completed by 65% (22/34) of the mobilization and 73% (19/26) of comparator tool participants. Participants completing the acceptability survey reported that the mobilization tool was usable, enjoyable, informative, and useful. Weight loss treatment was initiated by 59% (n = 19) of mobilization and 33% (n = 8) of comparator tool participants. The mobilization tool shows promise for increasing treatment initiation among primary care patients, which may increase population weight loss. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02708121.

scholarly journals Survey of Perceptions and Educational Needs of Primary Care Providers Regarding Management of Patients with Class II and III Obesity in Ontario, Canada

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Zevin ◽  
Mary Imelda Martin ◽  
Nancy Dalgarno ◽  
Linda Chan ◽  
Nardhana Sivapalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Additional Education ◽  
Weight Loss Interventions

Abstract Background: Primary care providers (PCPs) are typically the primary contact for patients with obesity seeking medical and surgical weight loss interventions; however, previous studies suggest that fewer than 7% of eligible adult patients are referred to publically funded medical and surgical weight loss interventions (MSWLI).Methods: We performed an anonymous survey study between October 2017 and June 2018 to explore the knowledge, experiences, perceptions, and educational needs of PCPs in Southeastern Ontario in managing patients with class II and III obesity. Results: Surveys were distributed to 591 PCPs (n=538 family physicians; n=53 nurse practitioners) identified as practicing in the Southeastern Ontario and 103 (17.4%) participated. PCPs serving a rural population estimated that 14.2±10.9% of patients would qualify for MSWLI compared to 9.9±8.5% of patients of PCPs serving an urban population (p=.049). Overall, 57.5% of respondents did not feel competent prescribing MSWLI to patients with class II/III obesity, while 69.8% stated they had ‘good’ knowledge of the referral criteria for MSWLI. 22.2% of respondents were hesitant to refer patients for bariatric surgery (BS) due to concerns about postoperative surgical complications and risks associated with surgery. Only 25% of respondents were comfortable providing long-term follow up after BS, and only 39.1% had participated in continuing education on management of patients with class II/III obesity in the past five years. Conclusion: The majority of PCPs believe there is a need for additional education about MSWLI for patients with class II/III obesity. Future studies are needed to develop and compare the effectiveness of additional education and professional development around risks of contemporary BS, indications to consider referral for MSWLI, management and long-term follow-up of patients after BS.

scholarly journals Survey of perceptions and educational needs of primary care providers regarding management of patients with class II and III obesity in Ontario, Canada

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Zevin ◽  
Mary Martin ◽  
Nancy Dalgarno ◽  
Linda Chan ◽  
Nardhana Sivapalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Additional Education ◽  
Weight Loss Interventions

Abstract Background Primary care providers (PCPs) are typically the primary contact for patients with obesity seeking medical and surgical weight loss interventions; however, previous studies suggest that fewer than 7% of eligible adult patients are referred to publically funded medical and surgical weight loss interventions (MSWLI). Methods We performed an anonymous survey study between October 2017 and June 2018 to explore the knowledge, experiences, perceptions, and educational needs of PCPs in Southeastern Ontario in managing patients with class II and III obesity. Results Surveys were distributed to 591 PCPs (n = 538 family physicians; n = 53 nurse practitioners) identified as practicing in the Southeastern Ontario and 92 (15.6%) participated. PCPs serving a rural population estimated that 14.2 ± 10.9% of patients would qualify for MSWLI compared to 9.9 ± 8.5% of patients of PCPs serving an urban population (p = .049). Overall, 57.5% of respondents did not feel competent prescribing MSWLI to patients with class II/III obesity, while 69.8% stated they had ‘good’ knowledge of the referral criteria for MSWLI. 22.2% of respondents were hesitant to refer patients for bariatric surgery (BS) due to concerns about postoperative surgical complications and risks associated with surgery. Only 25% of respondents were comfortable providing long-term follow up after BS, and only 39.1% had participated in continuing education on management of patients with class II/III obesity in the past 5 years. Conclusion The majority of PCPs believe there is a need for additional education about MSWLI for patients with class II/III obesity. Future studies are needed to develop and compare the effectiveness of additional education and professional development around risks of contemporary BS, indications to consider referral for MSWLI, management and long-term follow-up of patients after BS.

scholarly journals Online Lifestyle Modification Intervention: Survey of Primary Care Providers� Attitudes and Views (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem M Hanna ◽  
Gary Fischer ◽  
Molly B Conroy ◽  
Cindy Bryce ◽  
Rachel Hess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Lifestyle Modification ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Primary Care Visit ◽  
Obese Adult ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Online Tools ◽  
Online Lifestyle ◽  
Modification Intervention

BACKGROUND Online tools are a convenient and effective method of delivering lifestyle interventions to obese adult primary care patients. A referral model allows physicians to efficiently direct their patients to the intervention during a primary care visit. However, little is known of physicians’ perspectives and utilization of the referral model for an online lifestyle modification intervention. OBJECTIVE The aim was to evaluate the response of primary care providers (PCPs) to a referral model for implementing a year-long online intervention for weight loss to obese adult patients. METHODS The PCPs at six primary care clinics were asked to refer adult obese patients to a year-long online lifestyle intervention providing self-management support for weight loss. Following the 1-year intervention, all providers at the participating practices were surveyed regarding their views of the program. Respondents completed survey items assessing their attitudes regarding the 1-year intensive weight loss intervention and identifying resources they would find helpful for assisting patients with weight loss. Referring physicians were asked about their level of satisfaction with implementing the counseling services using standard electronic health record referral processes. Attitudes toward obesity counseling among referring and nonreferring providers were compared. Impressions of how smoothly the referral model of obesity treatment integrated with the clinical workflow were also quantified. RESULTS Of the 67 providers who completed the surveys, nonreferring providers (n=17) were more likely to prefer counseling themselves (P=.04) and to report having sufficient time to do so (P=.03) than referring providers (n=50) were. Nonreferring providers were more likely to report that their patients lacked computer skills (76%, 13/17 vs 34%, 17/50) or had less access to the Internet (65%, 11/17 vs 32%, 16/50). CONCLUSIONS Understanding providers’ views and barriers regarding the integration of online tools will facilitate widespread implementation of an online lifestyle modification intervention.

scholarly journals Survey of Perceptions and Educational Needs of Primary Care Providers Regarding Management of Patients with Class II and III Obesity in Ontario, Canada

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Zevin ◽  
Mary Imelda Martin ◽  
Nancy Dalgarno ◽  
Linda Chan ◽  
Nardhana Sivapalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Additional Education ◽  
Weight Loss Interventions

Abstract Background: Primary care providers (PCPs) are typically the primary contact for patients with obesity seeking medical and surgical weight loss interventions; however, previous studies suggest that fewer than 7% of eligible adult patients are referred to publically funded medical and surgical weight loss interventions (MSWLI).Methods: We performed an anonymous survey study between October 2017 and June 2018 to explore the knowledge, experiences, perceptions, and educational needs of PCPs in Southeastern Ontario in managing patients with class II and III obesity. Results: Surveys were distributed to 591 PCPs (n=538 family physicians; n=53 nurse practitioners) identified as practicing in the Southeastern Ontario and 103 (15.6%) participated. PCPs serving a rural population estimated that 14.2±10.9% of patients would qualify for MSWLI compared to 9.9±8.5% of patients of PCPs serving an urban population (p=.049). Overall, 57.5% of respondents did not feel competent prescribing MSWLI to patients with class II/III obesity, while 69.8% stated they had ‘good’ knowledge of the referral criteria for MSWLI. 22.2% of respondents were hesitant to refer patients for bariatric surgery (BS) due to concerns about postoperative surgical complications and risks associated with surgery. Only 25% of respondents were comfortable providing long-term follow up after BS, and only 39.1% had participated in continuing education on management of patients with class II/III obesity in the past five years. Conclusion: The majority of PCPs believe there is a need for additional education about MSWLI for patients with class II/III obesity. Future studies are needed to develop and compare the effectiveness of additional education and professional development around risks of contemporary BS, indications to consider referral for MSWLI, management and long-term follow-up of patients after BS.

scholarly journals Barriers to weight loss among community health center patients: qualitative insights from primary care providers

BMC Obesity ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca C. Woodruff ◽  
Gillian L. Schauer ◽  
Ann R. Addison ◽  
Ajay Gehlot ◽  
Michelle C. Kegler
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Community Health Center ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers

scholarly journals Survey of Perceptions and Educational Needs of Primary Care Providers Regarding Management of Patients with Class II and III Obesity in Ontario, Canada

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Zevin ◽  
Mary Imelda Martin ◽  
Nancy Dalgarno ◽  
Linda Chan ◽  
Nardhana Sivapalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Additional Education ◽  
Weight Loss Interventions

Abstract Background: Primary care providers (PCPs) are typically the primary contact for patients with obesity seeking medical and surgical weight loss interventions; however, previous studies suggest that fewer than 7% of eligible adult patients are referred to publically funded medical and surgical weight loss interventions (MSWLI)Methods: We performed an anonymous survey study between October 2017 and June 2018 to explore the knowledge, experiences, perceptions, and educational needs of PCPs in Southeastern Ontario in managing patients with class II and III obesity. Results: Surveys were distributed to 591 PCPs (n=538 family physicians; n=53 nurse practitioners) identified as practicing in the Southeastern Ontario and 103 (15.6%) participated. PCPs serving a rural population estimated that 14.2±10.9% of patients would qualify for MSWLI compared to 9.9±8.5% of patients of PCPs serving an urban population (p=.049). Overall, 57.5% of respondents did not feel competent prescribing MSWLI to patients with class II/III obesity, while 69.8% stated they had ‘good’ knowledge of the referral criteria for MSWLI. 22.2% of respondents were hesitant to refer patients for bariatric surgery (BS) due to concerns about postoperative surgical complications and risks associated with surgery. Only 25% of respondents were comfortable providing long-term follow up after BS, and only 39.1% had participated in continuing education on management of patients with class II/III obesity in the past five years. Conclusion: The majority of PCPs believe there is a need for additional education about MSWLI for patients with class II/III obesity. Future studies are needed to develop and compare the effectiveness of additional education and professional development around risks of contemporary BS, indications to consider referral for MSWLI, management and long-term follow-up of patients after BS.

The Perspective of Older Men With Depression on Suicide and Its Prevention in Primary Care

Crisis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 397-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Vannoy ◽  
Mijung Park ◽  
Meredith R. Maroney ◽  
Jürgen Unützer ◽  
Ester Carolina Apesoa-Varano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Older Men ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Depression Treatment ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Self Image ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Background: Suicide rates in older men are higher than in the general population, yet their utilization of mental health services is lower. Aims: This study aimed to describe: (a) what primary care providers (PCPs) can do to prevent late-life suicide, and (b) older men's attitudes toward discussing suicide with a PCP. Method: Thematic analysis of interviews focused on depression and suicide with 77 depressed, low-socioeconomic status, older men of Mexican origin, or US-born non-Hispanic whites recruited from primary care. Results: Several themes inhibiting suicide emerged: it is a problematic solution, due to religious prohibition, conflicts with self-image, the impact on others; and, lack of means/capacity. Three approaches to preventing suicide emerged: talking with them about depression, talking about the impact of their suicide on others, and encouraging them to be active. The vast majority, 98%, were open to such conversations. An unexpected theme spontaneously arose: "What prevents men from acting on suicidal thoughts?" Conclusion: Suicide is rarely discussed in primary care encounters in the context of depression treatment. Our study suggests that older men are likely to be open to discussing suicide with their PCP. We have identified several pragmatic approaches to assist clinicians in reducing older men's distress and preventing suicide.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document