scholarly journals eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. e330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afaf Girgis ◽  
Ivana Durcinoska ◽  
Janelle V Levesque ◽  
Martha Gerges ◽  
Tiffany Sandell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Personalized Treatment ◽  
Mixed Methods Approach ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Patient-reported Outcome Measures – A Call for More Narrative Evidence

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110496
Author(s):  
Keith Meadows
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Quantitative Approach ◽  
Mixed Methods Approach ◽  
Patient Reported

This article puts forward the need to reconsider the current underlying quantitative approach underpinning the application of patient reported outcomes, to a mixed methods approach through the tandem use of patients’ narrative that enables informants in addition to their scores to express the reality of the ways in which their lives are physically and mentally impacted by their health status.

scholarly journals Multidisciplinary data infrastructures in multiple sclerosis: Why they are needed and can be done!

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liesbet M Peeters ◽  
Caspar EP van Munster ◽  
Bart Van Wijmeersch ◽  
Robin Bruyndonckx ◽  
Ilse Lamers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Personalized Treatment ◽  
Multidisciplinary Data ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Longitudinal Data Collection ◽  
Patient Profiling ◽  
Data Infrastructures

Personalized treatment is highly desirable in multiple sclerosis (MS). We believe that multidisciplinary measurements including clinical, functional and patient-reported outcome measures in combination with extensive patient profiling can enhance personalized treatment and rehabilitation strategies. We elaborate on four reasons behind this statement: (1) MS disease activity and progression are complex and multidimensional concepts in nature and thereby defy a one-size-fits-all description, (2) functioning, progression, treatment, and rehabilitation effects are interdependent and should be investigated together, (3) personalized healthcare is based on the dynamics of system biology and on technology that confirms a patient’s fundamental biology and (4) inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures can facilitate patient-relevant healthcare. We discuss currently available multidisciplinary MS data initiatives and introduce joint actions to further increase the overall success. With this topical review, we hope to drive the MS community to invest in expanding towards more multidisciplinary and longitudinal data collection.

scholarly journals Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for quality of care assessment: a pilot study protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Fauci ◽  
A Acampora ◽  
C Cadeddu ◽  
C Angioletti ◽  
A G De Belvis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background There is emerging interest in integrating Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) into the assessment of care quality. This study protocol aims at testing the collection and use of PROMs for evaluating and comparing health outcomes by patients with colorectal cancer. This is part of a project of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità and Gruppo Italiano di Reti Oncologiche (GIRO) aimed at promoting Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) for performance evaluation of oncological healthcare providers. Methods A multicentric prospective observational study will be conducted at the seven GIRO oncological hospitals. For each hospital, 40 colorectal cancer patients undergoing either surgery or surgery plus neoadjuvant therapy, will be recruited (20 colon; 20 rectum) over 12 months. The data will be collected twice (before and after surgery) or three times for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, by using EORTC-C30, a generic module for cancer patients and EORTC-CR29, a specific module for colorectal cancer patients. Collected data will be analyzed descriptively and the scores of each hospital will be compared to the overall scores of all the centers. Additional medical information will be used to adjust for the center casemix. Feedback from health professionals and patients will be collected through structured questionnaires and focus groups. Results The results will be interpreted to assess and compare the health outcomes reported by the patients among the GIRO hospitals. Feedback from health professionals and patients will help identify barriers and facilitators of implementation of PROs collection. Conclusions PROMs have the potential to systematically incorporate the patient perspective into the health outcome measurements for performance evaluation and benchmarking, which is essential to delivering high-value patient-centered care. The PROMs collected in this study will be integrated in a set of process and outcome indicators previously defined within same project. Key messages Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) have the potential to systematically incorporate the patient perspective, which is essential to delivering high-value patient-centered care. It is critical to integrate PROMs in performance evaluation and comparison among oncological healthcare providers for improving the quality of care in a Value-Based Healthcare perspective.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document