Digital Health Literacy and Preparedness: Comparison of Veterans Health Affairs Users and Other Veterans Nationally (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlie Wray ◽  
Janet Tang ◽  
Amy Byers ◽  
Salomeh Keyhani

BACKGROUND As health care systems shift to greater use of telemedicine and digital tools, an individual’s digital health literacy has become an important skill set. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) has invested resources in providing digital health care; however, to date, no study has compared the digital health literacy and preparedness of Veterans receiving care in the VA to Veterans receiving care outside the VA. OBJECTIVE Describe digital health literacy and preparedness among Veterans who receive care within and outside the VA health care system and examine whether receiving care in the VA is associated with digital preparedness (having >2 digital health literacy skills) after accounting for demographic and social risk factors. METHODS We used cross-sectional data from the 2016-18 National Health Interview Survey to identify Veterans (age>18) who obtain health care either within or outside the VA health care system. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association of sociodemographic (age, sex, race, ethnicity), social risk factors (economic instability, disadvantaged neighborhood, low educational attainment, and social isolation), and health care delivery location (VA and non-VA) with digital preparedness. RESULTS Those who received health care within the VA health care system (n=3,188) were younger (age 18-49: 33.3% [30.7-36.0] vs. 24.2% [21.9-26.5], p<0.01), were more often female (34.7% [32.0-37.3] vs. 6.6% [5.5-7.6], p<0.01) and identified as Black (13.1% [11.2-15.0] vs. 10.2% [8.7-11.8], p<0.01), and reported greater economic instability (8.3% [6.9-9.8] vs. 5.5% [4.6-6.5], p<0.01) and social isolation (42.6% [40.3-44.9] vs. 35.4% [33.4-37.5], p<0.01) compared to Veterans who received care outside the VA (n=3,393). Veterans who obtained care within the VA reported higher digital health literacy than those who obtained care outside the VA, endorsing greater rates of looking up health information on the internet (51.8% [49.2-54.4] vs. 45.0% [42.6-47.3], p<0.01), filling a prescription using the internet (16.2% [14.5-18.0] vs. 11.3% [9.6-13.0], p<0.01), scheduling a health care appointment on the internet (14.1% [12.4-15.8] vs. 11.6% [10.1-13.1], p=0.02), and communicating with a health care provider by email (18.0% [16.1-19.8] vs. 13.3% [11.6-14.9], p<0.01). In adjusted analysis, age >75 (aOR: 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.76), low educational attainment (aOR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.34-0.48) and social isolation (aOR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.92) were associated with a lower likelihood of being digitally prepared. Receiving health care from the VA was the only characteristic associated with higher odds (aOR: 1.36, 95% CI 1.12-1.65) of being digitally prepared. CONCLUSIONS Despite these demographic disadvantages to digital uptake, Veterans who receive care in the VA have higher digital health literacy and appear more digitally prepared than Veterans who do not receive care within the VA – suggesting a positive, system-level influence on this cohort.

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Constance Hilory Tomberlin

There are a multitude of reasons that a teletinnitus program can be beneficial, not only to the patients, but also within the hospital and audiology department. The ability to use technology for the purpose of tinnitus management allows for improved appointment access for all patients, especially those who live at a distance, has been shown to be more cost effective when the patients travel is otherwise monetarily compensated, and allows for multiple patient's to be seen in the same time slots, allowing for greater access to the clinic for the patients wishing to be seen in-house. There is also the patient's excitement in being part of a new technology-based program. The Gulf Coast Veterans Health Care System (GCVHCS) saw the potential benefits of incorporating a teletinnitus program and began implementation in 2013. There were a few hurdles to work through during the beginning organizational process and the initial execution of the program. Since the establishment of the Teletinnitus program, the GCVHCS has seen an enhancement in patient care, reduction in travel compensation, improvement in clinic utilization, clinic availability, the genuine excitement of the use of a new healthcare media amongst staff and patients, and overall patient satisfaction.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Linda E. Weinberger ◽  
Shoba Sreenivasan ◽  
Daniel E. Smee ◽  
James McGuire ◽  
Thomas Garrick

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Frehn ◽  
Amanda L. Brewster ◽  
Stephen M. Shortell ◽  
Hector P. Rodriguez

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supp) ◽  
pp. 475-484
Author(s):  
Adriana Izquierdo ◽  
Michael Ong ◽  
Felica Jones ◽  
Loretta Jones ◽  
David Ganz ◽  
...  

Background: Little has been written about engaging potentially eligible members of a health care system who are not accessing the care to which they are entitled. Know­ing more about the experiences of African American Veterans who regularly experi­ence health care access challenges may be an important step toward equitable, coordi­nated Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care. This article explores the experiences of African American Veterans who are at risk of experiencing poor care coordination.Design: We partnered with a community organization to recruit and engage Veterans in three exploratory engagement workshops between October 2015 and February 2016.Participants and Setting: Veterans living in South Los Angeles, CaliforniaMain Outcome Measures: Veterans were asked to describe their experiences with community care and the VHA, a division of the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Field notes taken during the workshops were analyzed by community and academic partners using grounded theory methodol­ogy to identify emergent themes.Results: 12 Veterans and 3 family members of Veterans participated in one or more en­gagement workshops. Their trust in the VA was generally low. Positive themes included: Veterans have knowledge to share and want to help other Veterans; and connecting to VA services can result in positive experi­ences. Negative themes included: functional barriers to accessing VA health care services; insensitive VA health care environment; lack of trust in the VA health care system; and Veteran status as disadvantageous for accessing non-VA community services.Conclusions: Veterans living in underserved areas who have had difficulty accessing VA care have unique perspectives on VA services. Partnering with trusted local com­munity organizations to engage Veterans in their home communities is a promising strategy to inform efforts to improve care access and coordination for vulnerable Vet­erans.Ethn Dis. 2018;28(Suppl 2):475-484; doi:10.18865/ed.28.S2.475.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document