scholarly journals The Effects of Implicit and Explicit Motor Learning in Gait Rehabilitation of People After Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. e142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Juan Jie ◽  
Melanie Kleynen ◽  
Kenneth Meijer ◽  
Anna Beurskens ◽  
Susy Braun
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Motor Learning ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Gait Rehabilitation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Implicit And Explicit ◽  
Explicit Motor Learning

scholarly journals Implicit and explicit motor learning interventions for gait in people after stroke: a process evaluation on fidelity and feasibility performed alongside a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Juan Jie ◽  
Melanie Kleynen ◽  
Kenneth Meijer ◽  
Anna Beurskens ◽  
Susy Braun
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Motor Learning ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Time Restrictions ◽  
Audio Recordings ◽  
Spatiotemporal Parameters ◽  
Implicit And Explicit ◽  
Learning Interventions ◽  
Explicit Motor Learning

PurposeTo evaluate whether the implicit and explicit motor learning walking interventions for people after stroke delivered in a randomized controlled trial were performed as intended (fidelity) and to report the therapist and participant experiences with regard to feasibility.MethodsDose delivered and content of instructions were assessed by evaluating the therapist logs and audio recordings of the training sessions. The therapist and participant experiences were assessed by means of self-developed questionnaires.Results79 people were included of which seven people (9%) dropped out. The remaining participants all received the required minimum of seven sessions. Overall therapists adhered to the intervention guideline. On average 5.2 and 0.4 explicit rules were used within the explicit group and implicit group respectively. Therapists and participants were generally positive about the feasibility but frequent comments were made by the therapists regarding “therapy time restrictions” and “tendency of the participants to develop explicit rules”. A variety of changes were observed ranging from improvements in spatiotemporal parameters to cognitions and emotions.ConclusionThe delivery of the implicit and explicit motor learning walking interventions were successful in terms of fidelity. Therapists and participants were generally positive about the feasibility of the intervention.

scholarly journals The role of vaginal palpation in motor learning of the pelvic floor muscles for women with stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Letícia de Azevedo Ferreira ◽  
Fátima Faní Fitz ◽  
Márcia Maria Gimenez ◽  
Mayanni Magda Pereira Matias ◽  
Maria Augusta Tezelli Bortolini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Motor Learning ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pelvic Floor Muscles ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Does focus of attention alter craniocervical flexion test motor learning? A randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 102709
Author(s):  
Maurício Scholl Schell ◽  
Francisco Xavier de Araujo ◽  
Rosicler da Rosa Almeida ◽  
Ian Sulzbacher Peroni ◽  
Carolina Gomes Rosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Motor Learning ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Focus Of Attention ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Flexion Test

IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT VIDEO FEEDBACK ON LANDING MECHANICS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 309.1-309
Author(s):  
Nelson Cortes ◽  
Tijana Popovic ◽  
Oladipo Eddo ◽  
Anne Benjaminse ◽  
Amanda Caswell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Video Feedback ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Landing Mechanics ◽  
Implicit And Explicit
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document