scholarly journals DEVELOPMENT OF DAM INFLOW PREDICTION SYSTEM BASED ON DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 289-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriaki HASHIMOTO ◽  
Akira FUJITA ◽  
Michiharu SHIIBA ◽  
Yasuto TACHIKAWA ◽  
Yutaka ICHIKAWA
2001 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira FUJITA ◽  
Hidemitsu DAITOU ◽  
Kaoru KAMISAKA ◽  
Michiharu SHIIBA ◽  
Yasuto TACHIKAWA ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongdae Lee ◽  
Sheung-Kown Kim ◽  
Ick Hwan Ko

Operation planning for a coordinated multi-reservoir is a complex and challenging task due to the inherent uncertainty in inflow. In this study, we suggest the use of a new, multi-stage and scenario-based stochastic linear program with a recourse model incorporating the meteorological weather prediction information for daily, coordinated, multi-reservoir operation planning. Stages are defined as prediction lead-time spans of the weather prediction system. The multi-stage scenarios of the stochastic model are formed considering the reliability of rainfall prediction for each lead-time span. Future inflow scenarios are generated by a rainfall–runoff model based on the rainfall forecast. For short-term stage (2 days) scenarios, the regional data assimilation and prediction system (RDAPS) information is employed, and for mid-term stage (more than 2 days) scenarios, precipitation from the global data assimilation and prediction system (GDAPS) is used as an input for the rainfall–runoff model. After the 10th day (third stage), the daily historical rainfall data are used following the ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) procedure. The model is applied to simulate the daily reservoir operation of the Nakdong River basin in Korea in a real-time operational environment. The expected benefit of the stochastic model is markedly superior to that of the deterministic model with average rainfall information. Our study results confirm the effectiveness of the stochastic model in real-time operation with meteorological forecasts and the presence of inflow uncertainty.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Lee Stevenson ◽  
Christian Birkel ◽  
Aaron J. Neill ◽  
Doerthe Tetzlaff ◽  
Chris Soulsby

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1226
Author(s):  
Pakorn Ditthakit ◽  
Sirimon Pinthong ◽  
Nureehan Salaeh ◽  
Fadilah Binnui ◽  
Laksanara Khwanchum ◽  
...  

Accurate monthly runoff estimation is crucial in water resources management, planning, and development, preventing and reducing water-related problems, such as flooding and droughts. This article evaluates the monthly hydrological rainfall-runoff model’s performance, the GR2M model, in Thailand’s southern basins. The GR2M model requires only two parameters: production store (X1) and groundwater exchange rate (X2). Moreover, no prior research has been reported on its application in this region. The 37 runoff stations, which are located in three sub-watersheds of Thailand’s southern region, namely; Thale Sap Songkhla, Peninsular-East Coast, and Peninsular-West Coast, were selected as study cases. The available monthly hydrological data of runoff, rainfall, air temperature from the Royal Irrigation Department (RID) and the Thai Meteorological Department (TMD) were collected and analyzed. The Thornthwaite method was utilized for the determination of evapotranspiration. The model’s performance was conducted using three statistical indices: Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Correlation Coefficient (r), and Overall Index (OI). The model’s calibration results for 37 runoff stations gave the average NSE, r, and OI of 0.657, 0.825, and 0.757, respectively. Moreover, the NSE, r, and OI values for the model’s verification were 0.472, 0.750, and 0.639, respectively. Hence, the GR2M model was qualified and reliable to apply for determining monthly runoff variation in this region. The spatial distribution of production store (X1) and groundwater exchange rate (X2) values was conducted using the IDW method. It was susceptible to the X1, and X2 values of approximately more than 0.90, gave the higher model’s performance.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (26) ◽  
pp. 3953-3961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangmei Luo ◽  
Enli Wang ◽  
Shuanghe Shen ◽  
Hongxing Zheng ◽  
Yongqiang Zhang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document