scholarly journals Kidney Transplantation in the Context of Renal Replacement Therapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 2035-2039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd E. Pesavento
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1048
Author(s):  
Andreas Kronbichler ◽  
Maria Effenberger ◽  
Jae Il Shin ◽  
Christian Koppelstätter ◽  
Sara Denicolò ◽  
...  

Background and objectives: Renal transplantation is the preferred form of renal replacement therapy for the majority of patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). The Internet is a key tool for people seeking healthcare-related information. This current work explored the interest in kidney transplantation based on Internet search queries using Google TrendsTM. Design, setting, participants, and measurements: We performed a Google TrendsTM search with the search term “kidney transplantation” between 2004 (year of inception) and 2018. We retrieved and analyzed data on the worldwide trend as well as data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT), the Eurotransplant area, and the National Health Service (NHS) Transplant Register. Google TrendsTM indices were investigated and compared to the numbers of performed kidney transplants, which were extracted from the respective official websites of UNOS, ONT, Eurotransplant, and the NHS. Results: During an investigational period of 15 years, there was a significant decrease of the worldwide Google TrendsTM index from 76.3 to 25.4, corresponding to an absolute reduction of −50.9% and a relative reduction by −66.7%. The trend was even more pronounced for the UNOS area (−75.2%), while in the same time period the number of transplanted kidneys in the UNOS area increased by 21.9%. Events of public interest had an impact on the search queries in the year of occurrence, as shown by an increase in the Google TrendsTM index by 39.2% in the year 2005 in Austria when a person of public interest received his second live donor kidney transplant. Conclusions: This study indicates a decreased public interest in kidney transplantation. There is a clear need to raise public awareness, since transplantation represents the best form of renal replacement therapy for patients with ESRD. Information should be provided on social media, with a special focus on readability and equitable access, as well as on web pages.


2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (12) ◽  
pp. 863-870
Author(s):  
Jan Galle ◽  
Jana Reitlinger

AbstractIn renal replacement therapy, different methods are available: hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation (KTx). In addition, variants can be used: HD as a home HD or center HD, PD as a conventional PD or automated (cycler) PD, KTx as a potentially short-term predictable living donation or conventional donor kidney donation. The patient and his familiar or caring environment must be informed accordingly. This means first of all: information about which procedures of kidney replacement therapy are possible and can be offered. Then the specific risks associated with each procedure should be elucidated (e. g. HD and shunt bleeding, PD and peritonitis, KTx and infections/neoplasias). This necessarily includes a structured documentation of the educating center/doctor about the communicated information and decisions taken.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0208638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Kosoku ◽  
Junji Uchida ◽  
Shunji Nishide ◽  
Kazuya Kabei ◽  
Hisao Shimada ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Irene Bellini ◽  
Aisling E Courtney ◽  
Jennifer A McCaughan

Background: Failed kidney transplant recipients benefit from a new graft as the general incident dialysis population, although additional challenges in the management of these patients are often limiting the long-term outcomes. Previously failed grafts, a long history of comorbidities, side effects of long-term immunosuppression and previous surgical interventions are common characteristics in the repeated kidney transplantation population, leading to significant complex immunological and technical aspects and often compromising the short- and long-term results. Although recipients’ factors are acknowledged to represent one of the main determinants for graft and patient survival, there is increasing interest in expanding the donor’s pool safely, particularly for high-risk candidates. The role of living kidney donation in this peculiar context of repeated kidney transplantation has not been assessed thoroughly. The aim of the present study is to analyse the effects of a high-quality graft, such as the one retrieved from living kidney donors, in the repeated kidney transplant population context. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the outcomes of the repeated kidney transplant population at our institution from 1968 to 2019. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database and stratified according to the number of transplants: 1st, 2nd or 3rd+. The main outcomes were graft and patient survivals, recorded from time of transplant to graft failure (return to dialysis) and censored at patient death with a functioning graft. Duration of renal replacement therapy was expressed as cumulative time per month. A multivariate analysis considering death-censored graft survival, decade of transplantation, recipient age, donor age, living donor, transplant number, ischaemic time, time on renal replacement therapy prior to transplant and HLA mismatch at HLA-A, -B and -DR was conducted. In the multivariate analysis of recipient survival, diabetic nephropathy as primary renal disease was also included. Results: A total of 2395 kidney transplant recipients were analysed: 2062 (83.8%) with the 1st kidney transplant, 279 (11.3%) with the 2nd graft, 46 (2.2%) with the 3rd+. Mean age of 1st kidney transplant recipients was 43.6 ± 16.3 years, versus 39.9 ± 14.4 for 2nd and 41.4 ± 11.5 for 3rd+ (p < 0.001). Aside from being younger, repeated kidney transplant patients were also more often males (p = 0.006), with a longer time spent on renal replacement therapy (p < 0.0001) and a higher degree of sensitisation, expressed as calculated reaction frequency (p < 0.001). There was also an association between multiple kidney transplants and better HLA match at transplantation (p < 0.0001). A difference in death-censored graft survival by number of transplants was seen, with a median graft survival of 328 months for recipients of the 1st transplant, 209 months for the 2nd and 150 months for the 3rd+ (p = 0.038). The same difference was seen in deceased donor kidneys (p = 0.048), but not in grafts from living donors (p = 0.2). Patient survival was comparable between the three groups (p = 0.59). Conclusions: In the attempt to expand the organ donor pool, particular attention should be reserved to high complex recipients, such as the repeated kidney transplant population. In this peculiar context, the quality of the donor has been shown to represent a main determinant for graft survival—in fact, kidney retrieved from living donors provide comparable outcomes to those from single-graft recipients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (S1) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Scott Reule ◽  
Robert Foley ◽  
Areef Ishani ◽  
Mark Rosenberg

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: We set out to describe important associations and outcomes among those requiring maintenance renal replacement therapy with the patient volume per provider. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Through the combination of several large administrative datasets, including the United States Renal Data System (n=237,485), the American Medical Association Master file (n=6249), and Medicare data limited to 2012, we compared characteristics of patients, by quintile of patient/provider volume. χ2 and logistic regression, adjusted for various patient and provider factors for categorical and continuous variables, was used for baseline comparisons, respectively. Cox regression, adjusted for patient, provider, and socioeconomic variables, was used to calculate risks for important clinical outcomes such as kidney transplant listing, transplant receipt, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There is a threshold patient volume at which important clinical outcomes, including kidney transplantation and all-cause mortality, may be influenced. Higher patient volume is associated with adverse patient outcome. Those receiving care from providers with the highest patient volumes are less likely to receive kidney transplantation, live in a more rural area, and be non-White. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: There is a need to identify novel and potentially modifiable factors associated with patient outcome among those with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance renal replacement therapy. Provider level variables, such as patient volume, is one such variable. As nephrologists are often tasked with the care of variable numbers of patients on dialysis, a better understanding of this association is an unmet need.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document