Nierenersatzverfahren: Information, Aufklärung, Dokumentation

2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (12) ◽  
pp. 863-870
Author(s):  
Jan Galle ◽  
Jana Reitlinger
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Kidney Donation ◽  
Living Donation ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Donor Kidney ◽  
Kidney Replacement Therapy ◽  
Caring Environment

AbstractIn renal replacement therapy, different methods are available: hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation (KTx). In addition, variants can be used: HD as a home HD or center HD, PD as a conventional PD or automated (cycler) PD, KTx as a potentially short-term predictable living donation or conventional donor kidney donation. The patient and his familiar or caring environment must be informed accordingly. This means first of all: information about which procedures of kidney replacement therapy are possible and can be offered. Then the specific risks associated with each procedure should be elucidated (e. g. HD and shunt bleeding, PD and peritonitis, KTx and infections/neoplasias). This necessarily includes a structured documentation of the educating center/doctor about the communicated information and decisions taken.

Continuous Hemodiafiltration in Children

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 819-823
Author(s):  
Nancy A. Bishof ◽  
Thomas R. Welch ◽  
C. Frederic Strife ◽  
Frederick C. Ryckman
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Acute Renal Failure ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
Tumor Lysis ◽  
Continuous Arteriovenous Hemofiltration

Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration is a form of renal replacement therapy whereby small molecular weight solutes and water are removed from the blood via convection, alleviating fluid overload and, to a degree, azotemia. It has been used in many adults and several children. However, in patients with multisystem organ dysfunction and acute renal failure, continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration alone may not be sufficient for control of azotemia; intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis may be undesirable in such unstable patients. Recently, the technique of continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration has been used in many severely ill adults. We have used continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration in four patients at Children's Hospital Medical Center. Patient 1 suffered perinatal asphyxia and oliguria while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients 2 and 4 both had Burkitt lymphoma and tumor lysis syndrome. Patient 3 had septic shock several months after a bone marrow transplant. All had acute renal failure and contraindications to hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. A blood pump was used in three of the four patients, while spontaneous arterial flow was adequate in one. Continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration was performed for varying lengths of time, from 11 hours to 7 days. No patient had worsening of cardiovascular status or required increased pressor support during continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration. The two survivors (patients 2 and 4) eventually recovered normal renal function. Continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration is a safe and effective means of renal replacement therapy in the critically ill child. It may be ideal for control of the metabolic and electrolyte abnormalities of the tumor lysis syndrome.

Unplanned vs. planned peritoneal dialysis as initial therapy for dialysis patients in chronic kidney replacement therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela Lara Mendes ◽  
Camila Albuquerque Alves ◽  
Laudilene Cristina Rebello Marinho ◽  
Dayana Bitencourt Dias ◽  
Daniela Ponce
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Kidney Replacement Therapy

scholarly journals An International Analysis of Dialysis Services Reimbursement

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjan van der Tol ◽  
Norbert Lameire ◽  
Rachael L. Morton ◽  
Wim Van Biesen ◽  
Raymond Vanholder
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Kidney Replacement Therapy ◽  
Per Capita ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Background and objectivesThe prevalence of patients with ESKD who receive extracorporeal kidney replacement therapy is rising worldwide. We compared government reimbursement for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis worldwide, assessed the effect on the government health care budget, and discussed strategies to reduce the cost of kidney replacement therapy.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsCross-sectional global survey of nephrologists in 90 countries to assess reimbursement for dialysis, number of patients receiving hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, and measures to prevent development or progression of CKD, conducted online July to December of 2016.ResultsOf the 90 survey respondents, governments from 81 countries (90%) provided reimbursement for maintenance dialysis. The prevalence of patients per million population being treated with long-term dialysis in low- and middle-income countries increased linearly with Gross Domestic Product per capita (GDP per capita), but was substantially lower in these countries compared with high-income countries where we did not observe an higher prevalence with higher GDP per capita. The absolute expenditure for dialysis by national governments showed a positive association with GDP per capita, but the percent of total health care budget spent on dialysis showed a negative association. The percentage of patients on peritoneal dialysis was low, even in countries where peritoneal dialysis is better reimbursed than hemodialysis. The so-called peritoneal dialysis–first policy without financial incentive seems to be effective in increasing the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Few countries actively provide CKD prevention.ConclusionsIn low- and middle-income countries, reimbursement of dialysis is insufficient to treat all patients with ESKD and has a disproportionately high effect on public health expenditure. Current reimbursement policies favor conventional in-center hemodialysis.

scholarly journals Is There Decreasing Public Interest in Renal Transplantation? A Google TrendsTM Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1048
Author(s):  
Andreas Kronbichler ◽  
Maria Effenberger ◽  
Jae Il Shin ◽  
Christian Koppelstätter ◽  
Sara Denicolò ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Relative Reduction ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Search Term ◽  
Search Queries

Background and objectives: Renal transplantation is the preferred form of renal replacement therapy for the majority of patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). The Internet is a key tool for people seeking healthcare-related information. This current work explored the interest in kidney transplantation based on Internet search queries using Google TrendsTM. Design, setting, participants, and measurements: We performed a Google TrendsTM search with the search term “kidney transplantation” between 2004 (year of inception) and 2018. We retrieved and analyzed data on the worldwide trend as well as data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT), the Eurotransplant area, and the National Health Service (NHS) Transplant Register. Google TrendsTM indices were investigated and compared to the numbers of performed kidney transplants, which were extracted from the respective official websites of UNOS, ONT, Eurotransplant, and the NHS. Results: During an investigational period of 15 years, there was a significant decrease of the worldwide Google TrendsTM index from 76.3 to 25.4, corresponding to an absolute reduction of −50.9% and a relative reduction by −66.7%. The trend was even more pronounced for the UNOS area (−75.2%), while in the same time period the number of transplanted kidneys in the UNOS area increased by 21.9%. Events of public interest had an impact on the search queries in the year of occurrence, as shown by an increase in the Google TrendsTM index by 39.2% in the year 2005 in Austria when a person of public interest received his second live donor kidney transplant. Conclusions: This study indicates a decreased public interest in kidney transplantation. There is a clear need to raise public awareness, since transplantation represents the best form of renal replacement therapy for patients with ESRD. Information should be provided on social media, with a special focus on readability and equitable access, as well as on web pages.

Short-Term Impact of an Educational Program Promoting Live Donor Kidney Transplantation in Dialysis Centers

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Françoise G. Pradel ◽  
Puckwipa Suwannaprom ◽  
C. Daniel Mullins ◽  
John Sadler ◽  
Stephen T. Bartlett
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Educational Program ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Live Donor ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Donor Kidney ◽  
Live Donor Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Live Donor Kidney ◽  
Donor Kidney Transplantation

Context Given the shortage of kidneys available for transplantation, a community-based intervention trial was implemented to assess the impact of an educational program on patients' access to live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Objective To compare the short-term impact of a basic intervention and an enhanced intervention on patients' readiness to pursue LDKT. Design Baseline data and data from 1 week after interventions were analyzed. Participants 214 transplant-eligible hemodialysis patients attending 14 dialysis facilities in Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Interventions In the basic intervention, 107 patients watched a 10-minute videotape on the experience of recipients and live donors of a kidney. In the enhanced intervention, 107 patients watched the same videotape and had a discussion with a health educator on the risks and benefits of LDKT, who could be a donor, and how to address the barriers they were encountering when seeking a live kidney donor. Main outcome measure Patient reported whether they were considering LDKT, had talked with family or friends about LDKT, and had asked someone for a kidney. Results Over half of transplant-eligible patients were not pursuing LDKT at baseline (64% in the basic intervention group, 61% in the enhanced intervention group). One week after the intervention, the odds of considering LDKT were higher among African Americans (odds ratio [OR], 2.28; confidence interval [CI], 1.22–4.25), younger patients (OR, 0.94; CI, 0.91–0.97), and patients who spent less time on dialysis (OR, 0.90; CI, 0.83–0.97). The odds of asking for a kidney were higher among African Americans (OR, 4.94; CI, 2.54–9.60) and patients who perceived they were in poor to fair health (OR, 3.30; CI, 1.12–9.67). Conclusions Although both interventions helped patients consider LDKT and ask for a kidney, more time and expanded educational content might be needed to facilitate patients' discussion about LDKT with their loved ones.

Peritoneal dialysis: The unique features by compartmental delivery of renal replacement therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 128-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tibor Fülöp ◽  
Lajos Zsom ◽  
Mihály B. Tapolyai ◽  
Miklos Z. Molnar ◽  
Sohail Abdul Salim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy

scholarly journals Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Patients with Renal Insufficiency and Renal Replacement Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Buckenmayer ◽  
Lotte Dahmen ◽  
Joachim Hoyer ◽  
Sahana Kamalanabhaiah ◽  
Christian S. Haas
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Renal Insufficiency ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Sedimentation Rate ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation ◽  
Esrd Patients

Abstract Background: The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a simple laboratory diagnostic tool for estimating systemic inflammation. It remains unclear, if renal function affects ESR, thereby compromising its validity. This pilot study aims to compare prevalence and extent of ESR elevations in hospitalized patients with or without kidney disease. In addition, the impact of renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality on ESR was determined.Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study, patients were screened for ESR values. ESR was compared in patients with and without renal disease and/or RRT. In addition, ESR was correlated with other inflammatory markers, the extent of renal insufficiency and clinical characteristics.Results: A total of 203 patients was identified, showing an overall elevated ESR in the study population (mean 51.7±34.6 mm/h). ESR was significantly increased in all patients with severe infection, active vasculitis or cancer, respectively, independent from renal function. Interestingly, there was no difference in ESR between patients with and without kidney disease or those having received a prior renal transplant or being on hemodialysis. However, ESRD patients treated with peritoneal dialysis presented with a significantly higher ESR (78.3±33.1 mm/h, p<0.001), while correlation with other inflammatory markers was not persuasive.Conclusions: We showed that ESR: (1) does not differ between various stages of renal insufficiency; (2) may be helpful as a screening tool also in patients with renal insufficiency; and (3) is significantly increased in ESRD patients on peritoneal dialysis per se, while it seems not to be affected by hemodialysis or renal transplantation (see graphical abstract as supplementary material).

scholarly journals FC 028COVID-19 RELATED MORTALITY IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT AND DIALYSIS PATIENTS: A COMPARATIVE, PROSPECTIVE REGISTRY BASED STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Candellier ◽  
Eric Jean Goffin ◽  
Priya Vart ◽  
Marlies Noordzij ◽  
Miha Arnol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Replacement Therapy ◽  
Adjusted Model

Abstract Background and Aims Studies examining kidney failure patients with COVID-19 reported higher mortality in hemodialysis patients than in kidney transplant recipients. However, hemodialysis patients are often older and have more comorbidities. This study investigated the association of type of kidney replacement therapy with COVID-19 severity adjusting for differences in characteristics. Method Data were retrieved from the European Renal Association COVID-19 Database (ERACODA), which includes kidney replacement therapy patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from all over Europe. We included all kidney transplant recipients and hemodialysis patients who presented between February 1st and December 1st 2020 and had complete information reason for COVID-19 screening and vital status at day 28. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was made based on a PCR of a nasal or pharyngeal swab specimens and/or COVID-19 compatible findings on a lung CT scan. The association of kidney transplantation or hemodialysis with 28-day mortality was examined using Cox proportional-hazards regression models adjusted for age, sex, frailty and comorbidities. Additionally, this association was investigated in the subsets of patients that were screened because of symptoms or have had routine screening. Results A total of 1,670 patients (496 functional kidney transplant recipients and 1,174 hemodialysis patients) were examined. 16.9% of kidney transplant recipients and 23.9% of hemodialysis patients died within 28 days of presentation. In an unadjusted model, the risk of 28-day mortality was 33% lower in kidney transplant recipients compared with hemodialysis patients (hazard ratio (HR): 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.85). However, in an age, sex and frailty adjusted model, the risk of 28-day mortality was 29% higher in kidney transplant recipients (HR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.68), whereas in a fully adjusted model the risk was even 43% higher (HR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.93). This association in patients who were screened because of symptoms (n=1,145) was similar (fully adjusted model HR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.04). Results were similar when other endpoints were studied (e.g. risk for hospitalization, ICU admission or mortality beyond 28 days) as well as across subgroups. Only age was found to interact significantly, suggesting that the increased mortality risk associated with kidney transplantation was especially present in elderly subjects. Conclusion In this study, kidney transplant recipients had a greater risk of a more severe course of COVID-19 compared with hemodialysis patients when adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document