scholarly journals Is There Decreasing Public Interest in Renal Transplantation? A Google TrendsTM Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1048
Author(s):  
Andreas Kronbichler ◽  
Maria Effenberger ◽  
Jae Il Shin ◽  
Christian Koppelstätter ◽  
Sara Denicolò ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Relative Reduction ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Search Term ◽  
Search Queries

Background and objectives: Renal transplantation is the preferred form of renal replacement therapy for the majority of patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). The Internet is a key tool for people seeking healthcare-related information. This current work explored the interest in kidney transplantation based on Internet search queries using Google TrendsTM. Design, setting, participants, and measurements: We performed a Google TrendsTM search with the search term “kidney transplantation” between 2004 (year of inception) and 2018. We retrieved and analyzed data on the worldwide trend as well as data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT), the Eurotransplant area, and the National Health Service (NHS) Transplant Register. Google TrendsTM indices were investigated and compared to the numbers of performed kidney transplants, which were extracted from the respective official websites of UNOS, ONT, Eurotransplant, and the NHS. Results: During an investigational period of 15 years, there was a significant decrease of the worldwide Google TrendsTM index from 76.3 to 25.4, corresponding to an absolute reduction of −50.9% and a relative reduction by −66.7%. The trend was even more pronounced for the UNOS area (−75.2%), while in the same time period the number of transplanted kidneys in the UNOS area increased by 21.9%. Events of public interest had an impact on the search queries in the year of occurrence, as shown by an increase in the Google TrendsTM index by 39.2% in the year 2005 in Austria when a person of public interest received his second live donor kidney transplant. Conclusions: This study indicates a decreased public interest in kidney transplantation. There is a clear need to raise public awareness, since transplantation represents the best form of renal replacement therapy for patients with ESRD. Information should be provided on social media, with a special focus on readability and equitable access, as well as on web pages.

Nierenersatzverfahren: Information, Aufklärung, Dokumentation

2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (12) ◽  
pp. 863-870
Author(s):  
Jan Galle ◽  
Jana Reitlinger
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Kidney Donation ◽  
Living Donation ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Donor Kidney ◽  
Kidney Replacement Therapy ◽  
Caring Environment

AbstractIn renal replacement therapy, different methods are available: hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation (KTx). In addition, variants can be used: HD as a home HD or center HD, PD as a conventional PD or automated (cycler) PD, KTx as a potentially short-term predictable living donation or conventional donor kidney donation. The patient and his familiar or caring environment must be informed accordingly. This means first of all: information about which procedures of kidney replacement therapy are possible and can be offered. Then the specific risks associated with each procedure should be elucidated (e. g. HD and shunt bleeding, PD and peritonitis, KTx and infections/neoplasias). This necessarily includes a structured documentation of the educating center/doctor about the communicated information and decisions taken.

scholarly journals ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation as a renal replacement therapy—A single low-volume center experience in Japan

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0208638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Kosoku ◽  
Junji Uchida ◽  
Shunji Nishide ◽  
Kazuya Kabei ◽  
Hisao Shimada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Low Volume

scholarly journals Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Improves Graft and Recipient Survival in Patients with Multiple Kidney Transplants

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Irene Bellini ◽  
Aisling E Courtney ◽  
Jennifer A McCaughan
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Living Donor ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background: Failed kidney transplant recipients benefit from a new graft as the general incident dialysis population, although additional challenges in the management of these patients are often limiting the long-term outcomes. Previously failed grafts, a long history of comorbidities, side effects of long-term immunosuppression and previous surgical interventions are common characteristics in the repeated kidney transplantation population, leading to significant complex immunological and technical aspects and often compromising the short- and long-term results. Although recipients’ factors are acknowledged to represent one of the main determinants for graft and patient survival, there is increasing interest in expanding the donor’s pool safely, particularly for high-risk candidates. The role of living kidney donation in this peculiar context of repeated kidney transplantation has not been assessed thoroughly. The aim of the present study is to analyse the effects of a high-quality graft, such as the one retrieved from living kidney donors, in the repeated kidney transplant population context. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the outcomes of the repeated kidney transplant population at our institution from 1968 to 2019. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database and stratified according to the number of transplants: 1st, 2nd or 3rd+. The main outcomes were graft and patient survivals, recorded from time of transplant to graft failure (return to dialysis) and censored at patient death with a functioning graft. Duration of renal replacement therapy was expressed as cumulative time per month. A multivariate analysis considering death-censored graft survival, decade of transplantation, recipient age, donor age, living donor, transplant number, ischaemic time, time on renal replacement therapy prior to transplant and HLA mismatch at HLA-A, -B and -DR was conducted. In the multivariate analysis of recipient survival, diabetic nephropathy as primary renal disease was also included. Results: A total of 2395 kidney transplant recipients were analysed: 2062 (83.8%) with the 1st kidney transplant, 279 (11.3%) with the 2nd graft, 46 (2.2%) with the 3rd+. Mean age of 1st kidney transplant recipients was 43.6 ± 16.3 years, versus 39.9 ± 14.4 for 2nd and 41.4 ± 11.5 for 3rd+ (p < 0.001). Aside from being younger, repeated kidney transplant patients were also more often males (p = 0.006), with a longer time spent on renal replacement therapy (p < 0.0001) and a higher degree of sensitisation, expressed as calculated reaction frequency (p < 0.001). There was also an association between multiple kidney transplants and better HLA match at transplantation (p < 0.0001). A difference in death-censored graft survival by number of transplants was seen, with a median graft survival of 328 months for recipients of the 1st transplant, 209 months for the 2nd and 150 months for the 3rd+ (p = 0.038). The same difference was seen in deceased donor kidneys (p = 0.048), but not in grafts from living donors (p = 0.2). Patient survival was comparable between the three groups (p = 0.59). Conclusions: In the attempt to expand the organ donor pool, particular attention should be reserved to high complex recipients, such as the repeated kidney transplant population. In this peculiar context, the quality of the donor has been shown to represent a main determinant for graft survival—in fact, kidney retrieved from living donors provide comparable outcomes to those from single-graft recipients.

scholarly journals A path to renal transplantation in Nepal

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-55
Author(s):  
J Enns ◽  
G Aryal
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Human Leukocyte Antigen ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Human Leukocyte ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Leukocyte Antigen ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

End Stage Renal Disease affects many people in the world. There are three methods of renal replacement therapy available to patients: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, haemodialysis and transplantation. Transplantation is the most viable and cost effective form of renal replacement therapy that is available for these patients. There are 3 factors required to help ensure a successful renal transplantation program: A well legislated donor and recipient program, Human Leukocyte Antigen testing (pre and post transplant), as well as a post transplant follow up program. Keywords: Renal Transplant; South Asia; Nepal; Human Leukocyte Antigen DOI: 10.3126/jpn.v1i1.4453 Journal of Pathology of Nepal (2011) Vol.1, 52-55

scholarly journals Enhanced Public Interest in Response to the Refugee and Healthcare Crises in Greece

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ourania S. Kotsiou ◽  
Vaios S. Kotsios ◽  
Konstantinos I. Gourgoulianis
Keyword(s):  
Economic Crisis ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Search Term ◽  
The Public ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Search Volume ◽  
Aegean Islands ◽  
Relative Search Volume

Background: The Greek National Health System (NHS) has been profoundly affected by the synergy of the economic and refugee crises. We aimed at evaluating the public interest regarding refugee and healthcare issues in Greece. Methods: Google Trends was employed to normalize traffic data on a scale from 0 to 100, presented as monthly relative search volume (RSV) for the search term queries: “refugees”, “health”, “diseases”, “hospital”, and “economic crisis” in Greece, from the period 2008 to 2020. Cross-country comparisons in selected European countries were made. Results: The analysis of RSV data showed an upward trend for the keyword “refugee”, in Greece, in the last five years, with two remarkable peaks from 2015 to 2016 and from 2019 to the present. Interest regarding refugees was more prevalent in the Aegean islands compared to the mainland. The mass influx of refugees has been linked to disease-related concerns. The search terms “hospital” and “health” have been the most popular and constantly quested topics since the beginning of the economic crisis in Greece, in 2009. Similar trends existed across Europe. Conclusion: There is an urgent need for effective public awareness of current politico-ethical and social-economic conditions. The patterns of public interest can formulate public policy.

scholarly journals Robotic Versus Open Renal Transplantation in Obese Patients: Protocol for a Cost-Benefit Markov Model Analysis (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Molinari ◽  
Chethan Puttarajappa ◽  
Martin Wijkstrom ◽  
Armando Ganoza ◽  
Roberto Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Markov Model ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Robotic Assisted

BACKGROUND Recent studies have reported a significant decrease in wound problems and hospital stay in obese patients undergoing renal transplantation by robotic-assisted minimally invasive techniques with no difference in graft function. OBJECTIVE Due to the lack of cost-benefit studies on the use of robotic-assisted renal transplantation versus open surgical procedure, the primary aim of our study is to develop a Markov model to analyze the cost-benefit of robotic surgery versus open traditional surgery in obese patients in need of a renal transplant. METHODS Electronic searches will be conducted to identify studies comparing open renal transplantation versus robotic-assisted renal transplantation. Costs associated with the two surgical techniques will incorporate the expenses of the resources used for the operations. A decision analysis model will be developed to simulate a randomized controlled trial comparing three interventional arms: (1) continuation of renal replacement therapy for patients who are considered non-suitable candidates for renal transplantation due to obesity, (2) transplant recipients undergoing open transplant surgery, and (3) transplant patients undergoing robotic-assisted renal transplantation. TreeAge Pro 2017 R1 TreeAge Software, Williamstown, MA, USA) will be used to create a Markov model and microsimulation will be used to compare costs and benefits for the two competing surgical interventions. RESULTS The model will simulate a randomized controlled trial of adult obese patients affected by end-stage renal disease undergoing renal transplantation. The absorbing state of the model will be patients' death from any cause. By choosing death as the absorbing state, we will be able simulate the population of renal transplant recipients from the day of their randomization to transplant surgery or continuation on renal replacement therapy to their death and perform sensitivity analysis around patients' age at the time of randomization to determine if age is a critical variable for cost-benefit analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis comparing renal replacement therapy, robotic-assisted surgery or open renal transplant surgery. After running the model, one of the three competing strategies will result as the most cost-beneficial or cost-effective under common circumstances. To assess the robustness of the results of the model, a multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be performed by modifying the mean values and confidence intervals of key parameters with the main intent of assessing if the winning strategy is sensitive to rigorous and plausible variations of those values. CONCLUSIONS After running the model, one of the three competing strategies will result as the most cost-beneficial or cost-effective under common circumstances. To assess the robustness of the results of the model, a multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be performed by modifying the mean values and confidence intervals of key parameters with the main intent of assessing if the winning strategy is sensitive to rigorous and plausible variations of those values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document