scholarly journals Test-taking Strategies on Reading Comprehension Tests: A Review of Major Research Themes

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Mohammed S. Assiri ◽  
Emad A. Alodhahi
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Language Proficiency ◽  
Reading Test ◽  
Reading Tests ◽  
Test Taking ◽  
Research Themes ◽  
Test Taking Strategies ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Comprehension Tests ◽  
Reading Comprehension Tests

<p><em>There is a growing body of thought and research on strategy use on tests of reading comprehension. Nevertheless, there have been few research reviews that have treated major themes involved in thought and research on test-taking strategies, specifically in the context of reading comprehension. Hence, this paper reviews the themes that are central to the discussion of strategy choice and use on reading comprehension tests. Research themes that form the foci of the paper include discussion of test-taking strategies as they relate to the process of reading test-taking, formats of reading tests, validation of reading tests, level of language proficiency, and performance on tests of reading comprehension.</em></p>

Validity of Multiple-Sentence Reading Comprehension Tests for Aphasic Adults

1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. Nicholas ◽  
D. L. MacLennan ◽  
R. H. Brookshire
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Reading Test ◽  
Reading Tests ◽  
Test Items ◽  
Sentence Reading ◽  
Comprehension Tests ◽  
Reading Comprehension Tests

This study assessed the passage dependency of multiple-sentence reading test items from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (Goodglass & Kaplan, 1983), the Minnesota Test for Differential Diagnosis of Aphasia (Schuell, 1965), Examining for Aphasia (Eisenson, 1954), the Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia (LaPointe & Horner, 1979), and the Western Aphasia Battery (Kertesz, 1982). More than half of the test items from these reading tests were answered correctly by a significantly greater than chance number of both aphasic and non-brain-damaged adults without reading the passages whose comprehension the items purported to test. These results suggest that published tests for assessing aphasic persons' comprehension of multiple-sentence passages do not provide valid estimates of such persons' ability to comprehend information from printed texts.

Comprehending Text and Comprehension Tests

1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 94-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estelle A. Doctor
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Special Functions ◽  
Reading Test ◽  
Reading Tests ◽  
Comprehension Test ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Lexical Phonology ◽  
Comprehension Tests

Four different categories of reading tests are discussed with special attention to their relevance for reading comprehension. Diagnostic and phonic tests serve special functions, but pronunciation, or word tests are often assumed to be measures of comprehension. A detailed critique of one of these, the Schonell Graded Reading Test (R1) is presented and some explanations are suggested for the type of error usually made on this type of test. Several different types of comprehension tests exist, and these are discussed. A different comprehension test which distinguishes between the ability to comprehend material presented aurally and the ability to comprehend the same material in its printed form is presented. The relationship between pre- and post-lexical phonology is also discussed in relation to reading tests.

scholarly journals Test-Taking Strategies and Reading Comprehension: A Correlational Investigation

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-165
Author(s):  
Fadi Al-Khasawneh
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Language Proficiency ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
English Language ◽  
Placement Test ◽  
Test Taking ◽  
Proficiency Level ◽  
Data Collection Process ◽  
Test Taking Strategies ◽  
Efl Students

There is an increasing interest of studies investigating the correlation between Test-Taking Strategies (TTSs) and reading comprehension achievement among EFL learners. The relationship between the aforementioned variables is still unclear and more studies are needed on this area. The major concern of this study is to examine the correlational relationship between the use of test-taking strategies and reading comprehension. The sample of this study included 64 undergraduate students majoring in English language in King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia. The present research employed three instruments for data collection process; English Language Placement Test was used to distribute students according to their proficiency level, two reading passages taken from TOEFL reading comprehension tests, and a questionnaire adapted from Cohen and Upton (2007) asking about TTSs. The results of the present study illustrated that Saudi EFL students used test-taking strategies at a moderate level. There was no statistically significant correlation between test-taking strategies use and students’ achievement in reading comprehension test. There was also no significant differences between test-taking strategies and students; achievement in reading comprehension attributed to language proficiency level. Some pedagogical implications for EFL teachers were presented and discussed.

The Differential Importance of Component Skills on Reading Comprehension Test Performance Among Struggling Adolescent Readers

2020 ◽  
pp. 002221942093213
Author(s):  
Nathan H. Clemens ◽  
Yu-Yu Hsiao ◽  
Kejin Lee ◽  
Amanda Martinez-Lincoln ◽  
Clinton Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Reading Test ◽  
Adolescent Readers ◽  
Component Skills ◽  
Struggling Adolescent Readers ◽  
Text Reading ◽  
Comprehension Tests ◽  
Reading Comprehension Tests

Reading comprehension tests vary in format and characteristics, which may influence the extent to which component skills are involved in test performance. With students in Grades 6 to 8 with reading difficulties, dominance analyses examined the differential importance of component reading and language skills (word- and text-reading fluency, vocabulary, listening comprehension, and working memory) on several standardized tests of reading comprehension: The Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test, 4th edition (GMRT), Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation, Gray Oral Reading Test, 5th edition (GORT-5), and the Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension (TOSREC). Students’ word- and text-reading fluency skills were generally the most dominant predictors of performance on most reading comprehension tests, especially those with a time limit (GMRT and TOSREC). Listening comprehension was most important on the GORT-5, a test in which students read passages orally and listen to questions read by an examiner. Working memory was the least important component skill across the reading comprehension tests. Overall, results were consistent with previous work indicating that reading comprehension measures vary with regard to the skills or knowledge sources that are most important for test performance and extend these findings to struggling adolescent readers. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document