Small-cell lung cancer and large-cell neuroendocrine tumors of the lung

Author(s):  
David Planchard ◽  
Eric Baudin
2018 ◽  
pp. 555-568.e6
Author(s):  
Krista Noonan ◽  
Jules Derks ◽  
Janessa Laskin ◽  
Anne-Marie C. Dingemans

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7136-7136 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Wagenius ◽  
O. Brodin ◽  
J. Nyman ◽  
G. Greim ◽  
G. Hillerdal ◽  
...  

7136 Background: Metastasis to the brain is the most common intracranial tumour and 20–40% of all cancer patients will develop brain metastases. Lung cancer is the most common primary tumour and compose of 40%-50% of all brain metasases. As the survival in many malignancies increases, brain metastases will be an increasing problem. It is therefore important to find new treatment options. The aim of this study was primary to study quality of life and to compare radiotherapy and Themozolomide in that context. Methods: Inclusion criterias were confirmed small cell or non-small cell lung cancer, multiple brain metastases, PS 0–2, no previous radiotherapy to the brain. Previous chemotherapy was allowed. Patients were randomized to arm A (radiotherapy 30 Gy over 10 fractions) or arm B (Temozolomide 200 mg/m2 day 1–5, new cycle on day 29). Quality of life (QoL) was measured with a general cancer module, EORTC QLQ-C30, and a brain cancer specific module, BCM20. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients in each treatment arm with maintained or better QoL score at 8 weeks compared to the base line evaluation. In this first analysis exclusion rate from the study at 8 weeks was used as a surrogate end-point. Results: 208 patients were included, 104 in arm A and 104 in arm B. 36 (17%) squamous cell, 97 (47%) adenocarcinomas, 10 (5%) large cell, 23 (11%) undifferentiated and 42 (20%) small-cell lung cancer were included. 93 (45%) patients were chemonaive. At 8 weeks, 79 patients were excluded from the study, 51 (49%) from the temozolomide arm and 28 (27%) from the radiotherapy arm. 53% of the patients with squamous cell carcinoma were excluded compared to 40% of small cell lung cancer, 33% of adenocarcinomas and 27% of large cell carcinomas. The exclusion rate at 8 weeks was higher among patients with symptoms at randomization compared to patients without symptoms. There were no difference in exclusion rate when comparing number or size of the metastases. Conclusion: The exclusion rate at 8 weeks was higher in the temozolomide arm compared to the radiotherapy arm. Histopathology and symptoms at randomization seems to be factors influencing the exclusion rate whereas number or size of metastases does not. Survival and quality of life data will be presented at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. S809
Author(s):  
Akihiko Yoshizawa ◽  
Junya Fukuoka ◽  
Konstantin Shilo ◽  
Teri J. Franks ◽  
Stephen M. Hewitt ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 497-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Clery ◽  
Pasquale Pisapia ◽  
Elena Vigliar ◽  
Umberto Malapelle ◽  
Claudio Bellevicine ◽  
...  

In the late stages of non-small cell lung cancer, the detection of sensitizing mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is mandatory to select patients’ treatment with first- or second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In patients showing progressive disease, the assessment of the EGFR exon 20 resistance point mutation p.T790M is required for third-generation TKI administration. However, molecular analysis does not capture all the different mechanisms of resistance against these molecules. A variety of morphological changes associated with acquired resistance have also been described. Since an altered morphology may be the only clue to acquired resistance, cytopathology still plays a relevant role in this setting. In this comprehensive review, we have focused on the relevance of squamous cell carcinoma, small cell lung cancer and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma transitions from adenocarcinoma resistant to TKIs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liqing Zou ◽  
Tiantian Guo ◽  
Luxi Ye ◽  
Yue Zhou ◽  
Li Chu ◽  
...  

BackgroundPulmonary large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC) is commonly classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Even for stage I disease, after surgery the survival is always poor, but clinical research on LCNEC is scant and always with unsatisfying sample sizes. Thus, we conduct the first study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to compare survival after surgery between stage I LCNEC and other types of NSCLC.MethodsFrom 2004 to 2016, 473 patients with stage IA LCNEC, 17,669 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) and 8,475 patients with lung squamous cell cancer (LSCC), all treated with surgery were identified. In addition, 1:1 PSM was used, and overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between groups were compared.ResultsThe 5-year OS rates and CSS rates for LCNEC were 52.5% and 81.5%, respectively. Overall, both OS and CSS were significantly superior for stage IA LADC than LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.636, 95% CI 0.568-0.712; for CSS: HR 0.688, 95% CI 0.561–0.842, LCNEC as reference), while comparable for LSCC with LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.974, 95% CI 0.869–1.091; for CSS: HR 0.907, 95% CI 0.738–1.115). PSM generated 471 pairs when LCNEC was compared with LADC and both OS and CSS were significantly better in LADC than LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.580, 95% CI 0.491–0.686; for CSS: HR 0.602, 95% CI 0.446–0.814). Of note, for the subgroup of patients ≤ 65 years old, HRs for both OS and CSS were lower (for OS: HR 0.470; for CSS: HR 0.482). As for comparison between LCNEC and LSCC, PSM generated 470 pairs. Differently, only CSS was significantly superior in LSCC than LCNEC (HR 0.563, 95% CI 0.392–0.807), while OS was not. Further grouping by age showed only CSS between two groups for patients with age ≤ 65 years old was significantly different (P = 0.006).ConclusionsWe report the first survival comparison after surgery between stage IA LCNEC and other types of NSCLC by SEER database and PSM. Our results demonstrated after surgery, stage IA LCNEC was worse in survival, especially compared to LADC. Extra clinical care should be paid, especially for younger patients. More studies investigating adjuvant therapy are warranted.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 833-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Voortman ◽  
T. Harada ◽  
R.P. Chang ◽  
J.K. Killian ◽  
M. Suuriniemi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document