scholarly journals Relocation and seismotectonic interpretation of the seismic swarm of August - December of 2012 in the Linares area, northeastern Mexico

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen M. Gómez-Arredondo ◽  
Juan C. Montalvo-Arrieta ◽  
Arturo Iglesias-Mendoza ◽  
Victor H. Espíndola-Castro
Keyword(s):  
Fault Plane ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Nodal Plane ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Reverse Faulting ◽  
Northeastern Mexico ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
Maximum Horizontal Stress ◽  
Seismotectonic Interpretation

We relocated 52 events of 2.5 ≤ Mc ≤ 3.6 from a seismic sequence of over 250 events that occurred during July-December 2012 southwest of the Linares area, northeastern Mexico. To examine this swarm four seismic stations were installed in the region and operated during different time periods from September to December. Relocation of the swarm showed that the earthquake hypocentral depths were at 8 (±5) km, and the time residuals had values ≤ 0.38 s. The fault plane solutions were generated for individual earthquakes and through the use of the composite mechanism technique. The focal mechanism solutions show pure reverse faulting; the SW dipping NNW - SSE trending nodal plane is the inferred fault plane (strike ~150°, dip ~50° and rake ~67°), which reveals that maximum horizontal stress (SHmax > Shmin > Sv) predominates in the area.

scholarly journals Seismicity and seismotectonics of the Albstadt Shear Zone in the northern Alpine foreland

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Mader ◽  
Joachim R. R. Ritter ◽  
Klaus Reicherter ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Zone ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Driving Forces ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Delay Times ◽  
Seismic Networks ◽  
Maximum Horizontal Stress

Abstract. The region around the town Albstadt, SW Germany, was struck by four damaging earthquakes with magnitudes greater than five during the last century. Those earthquakes occurred along the Albstadt Shear Zone (ASZ) which is characterized by more or less continuous microseismicity. As there are no surface ruptures visible which may be connected to the fault zone, its characteristics can only be studied by its seismicity. We use the earthquake data of the state earthquake service of Baden-Württemberg from 2011 to 2018 and complement it with additional phase picks beginning 2016 at the AlpArray and StressTransfer seismic networks in the vicinity of the ASZ. This extended dataset is used to determine new minimum 1-D seismic vp and vs velocity models and corresponding station delay times for earthquake relocation. Fault plane solutions are determined for selected events and the direction of the maximum horizontal stress is derived. The minimum 1-D seismic velocity models have a simple and stable layering with increasing velocity with depth in the upper crust. The corresponding station delay times can be well explained by the lateral depth variation of the crystalline basement. The relocated events align north-south with most of the seismic activity between the towns of Tübingen and Albstadt east of the 9° E meridian. The events can be separated into several subclusters which indicate a segmentation of the ASZ. The majority of the 36 determined fault plane solutions features a NNE-SSW strike, but also NNW-SSE striking fault planes are observed. The main fault plane associated with the ASZ is dipping steeply and the rake indicates mainly sinistral strike-slip, but we also find minor components of normal and reverse faulting. The determined direction of the maximum horizontal stress of 147° is in good agreement with prior studies. This result indicates that the stress field in the area of the ASZ is mainly generated by the regional plate driving forces as well as the Alpine topography.

scholarly journals A holistic seismotectonic model of Delhi region

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brijesh K. Bansal ◽  
Kapil Mohan ◽  
Mithila Verma ◽  
Anup K. Sutar
Keyword(s):  
Strain Energy ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Energy Estimates ◽  
The West ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions ◽  
Northern India ◽  
Structural Environment ◽  
Reverse Faulting ◽  
Using Data

AbstractDelhi region in northern India experiences frequent shaking due to both far-field and near-field earthquakes from the Himalayan and local sources, respectively. The recent M3.5 and M3.4 earthquakes of 12th April 2020 and 10th May 2020 respectively in northeast Delhi and M4.4 earthquake of 29th May 2020 near Rohtak (~ 50 km west of Delhi), followed by more than a dozen aftershocks, created panic in this densely populated habitat. The past seismic history and the current activity emphasize the need to revisit the subsurface structural setting and its association with the seismicity of the region. Fault plane solutions are determined using data collected from a dense network in Delhi region. The strain energy released in the last two decades is also estimated to understand the subsurface structural environment. Based on fault plane solutions, together with information obtained from strain energy estimates and the available geophysical and geological studies, it is inferred that the Delhi region is sitting on two contrasting structural environments: reverse faulting in the west and normal faulting in the east, separated by the NE-SW trending Delhi Hardwar Ridge/Mahendragarh-Dehradun Fault (DHR-MDF). The WNW-ESE trending Delhi Sargoda Ridge (DSR), which intersects DHR-MDF in the west, is inferred as a thrust fault. The transfer of stress from the interaction zone of DHR-MDF and DSR to nearby smaller faults could further contribute to the scattered shallow seismicity in Delhi region.

scholarly journals A functional tool to explore the reliability of micro-earthquake focal mechanism solution for seismotectonic purposes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Maria Adinolfi ◽  
Raffaella De Matteis ◽  
Rita De Nardis ◽  
Aldo Zollo
Keyword(s):  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
Focal Mechanisms ◽  
Seismic Network ◽  
Fault System ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solution ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Earthquake Focal Mechanism

Abstract. Improving the knowledge of seismogenic faults requires the integration of geological, seismological, and geophysical information. Among several analyses, the definition of earthquake focal mechanisms plays an essential role in providing information about the geometry of individual faults and the stress regime acting in a region. Fault plane solutions can be retrieved by several techniques operating in specific magnitude ranges, both in the time and frequency domain and using different data. For earthquakes of low magnitude, the limited number of available data and their uncertainties can compromise the stability of fault plane solutions. In this work, we propose a useful methodology to evaluate how well a seismic network used to monitor natural and/or induced micro-seismicity estimates focal mechanisms as function of magnitude, location, and kinematics of seismic source and consequently their reliability in defining seismotectonic models. To study the consistency of focal mechanism solutions, we use a Bayesian approach that jointly inverts the P/S long-period spectral-level ratios and the P polarities to infer the fault-plane solutions. We applied this methodology, by computing synthetic data, to the local seismic network operated in the Campania-Lucania Apennines (Southern Italy) to monitor the complex normal fault system activated during the Ms 6.9, 1980 earthquake. We demonstrate that the method we propose can have a double purpose. It can be a valid tool to design or to test the performance of local seismic networks and more generally it can be used to assign an absolute uncertainty to focal mechanism solutions fundamental for seismotectonic studies.

PRESENT-DAY STATE-OF-STRESS OF SOUTHEAST AUSTRALIA

2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 283 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Nelson ◽  
R. Hillis ◽  
M. Sandiford ◽  
S. Reynolds ◽  
S. Mildren
Keyword(s):  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Southeast Australia ◽  
State Of Stress ◽  
Earthquake Focal Mechanism ◽  
Minimum Horizontal Stress ◽  
Maximum Horizontal Stress ◽  
Gippsland Basin

There have been several studies, both published and unpublished, of the present-day state-of-stress of southeast Australia that address a variety of geomechanical issues related to the petroleum industry. This paper combines present-day stress data from those studies with new data to provide an overview of the present-day state-of-stress from the Otway Basin to the Gippsland Basin. This overview provides valuable baseline data for further geomechanical studies in southeast Australia and helps explain the regional controls on the state-of-stress in the area.Analysis of existing and new data from petroleum wells reveals broadly northwest–southeast oriented, maximum horizontal stress with an anticlockwise rotation of about 15° from the Otway Basin to the Gippsland Basin. A general increase in minimum horizontal stress magnitude from the Otway Basin towards the Gippsland Basin is also observed. The present-day state-of-stress has been interpreted as strike-slip in the South Australian (SA) Otway Basin, strike-slip trending towards reverse in the Victorian Otway Basin and borderline strike-slip/reverse in the Gippsland Basin. The present-day stress states and the orientation of the maximum horizontal stress are consistent with previously published earthquake focal mechanism solutions and the neotectonic record for the region. The consistency between measured present-day stress in the basement (from focal mechanism solutions) and the sedimentary basin cover (from petroleum well data) suggests a dominantly tectonic far-field control on the present-day stress distribution of southeast Australia. The rotation of the maximum horizontal stress and the increase in magnitude of the minimum horizontal stress from west to east across southeast Australia may be due to the relative proximity of the New Zealand segment of the plate boundary.

scholarly journals A functional tool to explore the reliability of micro-earthquake focal mechanism solutions for seismotectonic purposes

Solid Earth ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-83
Author(s):  
Guido Maria Adinolfi ◽  
Raffaella De Matteis ◽  
Rita de Nardis ◽  
Aldo Zollo
Keyword(s):  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
Normal Fault ◽  
Focal Mechanisms ◽  
Seismic Network ◽  
Fault System ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Earthquake Focal Mechanism

Abstract. Improving the knowledge of seismogenic faults requires the integration of geological, seismological, and geophysical information. Among several analyses, the definition of earthquake focal mechanisms plays an essential role in providing information about the geometry of individual faults and the stress regime acting in a region. Fault plane solutions can be retrieved by several techniques operating in specific magnitude ranges, both in the time and frequency domain and using different data. For earthquakes of low magnitude, the limited number of available data and their uncertainties can compromise the stability of fault plane solutions. In this work, we propose a useful methodology to evaluate how well a seismic network, used to monitor natural and/or induced micro-seismicity, estimates focal mechanisms as a function of magnitude, location, and kinematics of seismic source and consequently their reliability in defining seismotectonic models. To study the consistency of focal mechanism solutions, we use a Bayesian approach that jointly inverts the P/S long-period spectral-level ratios and the P polarities to infer the fault plane solutions. We applied this methodology, by computing synthetic data, to the local seismic network operating in the Campania–Lucania Apennines (southern Italy) aimed to monitor the complex normal fault system activated during the Ms 6.9, 1980 earthquake. We demonstrate that the method we propose is effective and can be adapted for other case studies with a double purpose. It can be a valid tool to design or to test the performance of local seismic networks, and more generally it can be used to assign an absolute uncertainty to focal mechanism solutions fundamental for seismotectonic studies.

A Systematic Study of Earthquake Source Mechanism and Regional Stress Field in the Southern Montney Unconventional Play of Northeast British Columbia, Canada

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Babaie Mahani ◽  
Fatemeh Esfahani ◽  
Honn Kao ◽  
Michelle Gaucher ◽  
Mark Hayes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
Stress Field ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Source Mechanism ◽  
Induced Earthquakes ◽  
Nodal Plane ◽  
Reverse Faulting ◽  
Best Fitting

Abstract We provide a close look at the source mechanism of hydraulically fractured induced earthquakes and the in situ stress field within the southern Montney unconventional play in the northeast British Columbia, Canada. P‐wave first‐motion focal mechanisms were obtained for 66 earthquakes with magnitudes between 1.5 and 4.6. Results show that strike‐slip movement is the prevailing source mechanism for the events in this area, although reverse faulting is also observed for a few earthquakes. The best‐fitting nodal plane mostly strikes at ∼N60° E, with most events having dip angles of >60°. Using the Martinez‐Garzon et al. (2014) stress inversion module, we obtained the orientation of the three principal compressive stress (S1>S2>S3) and the relative intermediate principal stress magnitude (R) in five clusters. Assuming the best‐fitting nodal plane to be the causative fault, R values are mostly between 0.8 and 0.9 suggesting that the magnitude of S2 and S3 are similar, which is consistent with strike‐slip or reverse‐faulting regimes. The plunge of S1 varies between 1° and 3°, with its trend varying between N21°E and N34°E. On the other hand, the plunge of S3 varies between 22° and 50°, with its trend varies between N68°W and N58°W. Following Lund and Townend (2007), we calculated the trend of maximum horizontal stress to vary from N22°E to N33°E, in comparison with the average trend of N41°E from the World Stress Map (Heidbach et al., 2016). Through analysis of the Coulomb failure criterion and Mohr diagrams, we estimated the amount of pore‐pressure increase necessary to initiate shear slip to range between 4 and 29 MPa (average of 14±8  MPa) in the study area.

The tectonic stress and tectonic motion direction in the Pacific and Adjacent areas as calculated from earthquake fault plane solutions

1965 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Scheidegger
Keyword(s):  
Fault Plane ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Tectonic Stress ◽  
Pacific Basin ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions ◽  
Earthquake Fault ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Tectonic Motion ◽  
Consistent Picture

Abstract The best P and T axes as well as the best normals to the null directions were calculated for groups of earthquake fault plane solutions belonging to 29 areas of the Pacific Basin and vicinity. The method employed was one developed in an earlier paper of the writer; it is based on a calculation of the eigenvectors of a quadratic form. It is shown that the principal horizontal stress (PHS) directions obtained in this fashion are in excellent agreement with those obtained from other evidence. In the Western Pacific Basin and vicinity the calculations were sufficiently dense to determine PHS trajectories; the latter are shown and yield a consistent picture of the area in question.

The Lake Keowee, South Carolina Earthquakes of February through July 1986

1987 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Acree ◽  
Jill R. Acree ◽  
Pradeep Talwani
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Early Morning ◽  
Free Solution ◽  
Epicentral Area ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Duration Magnitude ◽  
First Motion ◽  
Maximum Horizontal Stress

Abstract In the early morning of 13 February 1986, an earthquake with a duration magnitude (MD) of 3.2 rumbled through northwestern South Carolina. The event was centered near Lake Keowee in Oconee County in a region of prior low level seismicity. Approximately eighty aftershocks with magnitudes ranging from −1.0 to 2.0 were recorded during the next six days. The locations of five aftershocks were accurately determined, utilizing data from portable seismographs deployed in the epicentral area. Depths of the two earthquakes with a location quality of B or better were between 3 and 4 km. First motion focal mechanism solutions for the mainshock suggest oblique slip along a plane striking northeast or northwest. The P axis was oriented northeast-southwest in support of the directions obtained from mechanisms of other local earthquakes and from direct measurements of the maximum horizontal stress in the regions. A second mainshock (MD = 2.8) occurred in the vicinity of Lake Keowee on 11 June 1986 and was followed by over sixty earthquakes during the next five weeks. Focal mechanism solutions from first motion data obtained for the mainshock resemble those of the 13 February event and suggest oblique slip along a northeast or northwest striking plane. Depths of the best located aftershocks were approximately 1 km. Two tests were applied to the data to assess the reliability of the depth estimates. These involve the determination that the plot of RMS travel time residual versus fixed solution depth exhibits a single, sharp RMS minimum at the depth obtained from a free solution (depth uniqueness) and that the final free solution depth is not dependent upon the choice of starting depth (depth stability). Free solution depths obtained for the majority of the better located aftershocks were found to be unique and stable at depths between 1 and 4 km. A northeast trending anomaly is prominent in the geophysical data for this area. This anomaly is interpreted to result from an abrupt, lateral change in lithology along a shallow, northeast striking plane. The earthquakes do not appear to be associated with this feature. Instead, these earthquakes appear to be associated with a shallow body and may represent slip along northeast or northwest striking joints. The proximity of these earthquakes to Lake Keowee suggests the possibility of reservoir triggering. No correlation between seismicity and reservoir level is evident prior to the February events. Rapid fluctuations in water level did precede the events in June and July, providing possible triggering mechanisms.

scholarly journals Seismicity in the Northern Rhine Area (1995–2018)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-G. Hinzen ◽  
Sharon K. Reamer ◽  
Claus Fleischer
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions ◽  
Quarter Century ◽  
Tectonic Earthquakes ◽  
Digital Seismograms ◽  
Maximum Horizontal Stress ◽  
The University ◽  
Observation Period

AbstractSince the mid-1990s, the local seismic network of the University of Cologne has produced digital seismograms. The data all underwent a daily routine processing. For this study, we re-processed data of almost a quarter century of seismicity in the Northern Rhine Area (NRA), including the Lower Rhine Embayment (LRE) and the Eifel Mountain region (EMR). This effort included refined discrimination between tectonic earthquakes, mine-induced events, and quarry blasts. While routine processing comprised the determination of local magnitude ML, in the course of this study, source spectra-based estimates for moment magnitude MW for 1332 earthquakes were calculated. The resulting relation between ML and MW agrees well with the theory of an ML ∝ 1.5 MW dependency at magnitudes below 3. By applying Gutenberg-Richter relation, the b-value for ML was less (0.82) than MW (1.03). Fault plane solutions for 66 earthquakes confirm the previously published N118° E direction of maximum horizontal stress in the NRA. Comparison of the seismicity with recently published Global Positioning System–based deformation data of the crust shows that the largest seismic activity during the observation period in the LRE occurred in the region with the highest dilatation rates. The stress directions agree well with the trend of major faults, and declining seismicity from south to north correlates with decreasing strain rates. In the EMR, earthquakes concentrate at the fringes of the area with corresponding the largest uplift.

Determining contemporary stress directions from neotectonic joint systems

1991 ◽  
Vol 337 (1645) ◽  
pp. 29-40 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Tectonic Stress ◽  
Stress Fields ◽  
Ebro Basin ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Initiation And Propagation

A neotectonic joint is a crack which propagated in a tectonic stress field that has persisted with little or no change of orientation until the present day. Investigating neotectonic joints is of value because the approximate orientation of the contemporary stress field can be inferred from them. Although exposed neotectonic joints in the flat-lying sedimentary rocks of some cratons are related to regional stress fields, their initiation and propagation occurred close to the Earth’s surface. For example, neotectonic joints in the centre of the Ebro basin (N. Spain) preferentially developed in a thin, near-surface channel sited within a sequence of weak Miocene limestones underlying the upper levels of plateaux. The Ebro basin joints strike uniformly NNW-SSE throughout an area of at least 10 000 km 2 and they are parallel or subparallel to the direction of greatest horizontal stress extrapolated from in situ stress measurements and fault-plane solutions of earthquakes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document