Study on Correlation between Blended Learning Effectiveness and Self-Directed Ability of Participants in TOEIC Intensive Program

Author(s):  
Insook Kil
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsipi Heart ◽  
Elad Finklestein ◽  
Menashe Cohen

Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess students’ perceptions of four teaching and learning (T&L) methods used in a blended learning Contract Law course, namely, frontal, written assignments, simulations and online asynchronous T&L. Design/methodology/approach Law students (n = 417) filled in an anonymous questionnaire on their relative satisfaction with the four methods and their preferences. Participation was voluntary. The questionnaire was administered at the end of term, in class, prior to the Covid-19 restrictions. The results were calculated using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Findings The students preferred face-to-face T&L in class and ranked online T&L last. Notably, 84% preferred blended learning combining all four methods. These results suggest that the online T&L for this Contract Law course setting was unsuccessful and that teachers should experiment with blending various T&L methods to maximize learning effectiveness and students’ satisfaction. Research limitations/implications The results only reflect one course in one year among law students, thus affecting the generalizability of the findings. This is further exacerbated by the convenience sample and the fact that only one type of blending was evaluated. Overall, the findings indicated that the survey participants were not yet ready to embrace online T&L as a primary component of blended T&L. Practical implications This study Alternative online solutions should be sought to foster social learning when face-to-face learning is not feasible for reasons, such as geographic distance, students’ disabilities or the current pandemic that prohibits social gatherings. This conclusion is particularly pertinent with respect to the impact of Covid-19 on face-to-face learning. Designers of blended learning programs should listen more carefully to students’ voices, and bear in mind that minimizing face-to-face T&L for various reasons might jeopardize students’ satisfaction, which is likely to decrease learning effectiveness. Social implications It is important that students’ perceptions be considered when building future T&L programs, especially students’ need for collaborative and social learning. Originality/value This study assessed four T&L methods administered in one course during the pre-Covid-19 era. This setting, which is rare, enabled a real-life assessment of the effectiveness of these popular methods as perceived by students.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 3433-3466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bokolo Anthony ◽  
Adzhar Kamaludin ◽  
Awanis Romli ◽  
Anis Farihan Mat Raffei ◽  
Danakorn Nincarean A/L Eh Phon ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gouri Banerjee

As higher education moves increasingly to blended and fully online environments, smaller institutions often ask whether this is a desirable trend. They face many challenges in transforming their largely face-to-face didactic teaching traditions to the technology mediated learning environments. Learning effectiveness and student satisfaction are seen to be decisive in whether blended environments are a positive development or not. Using survey data from a liberal arts and sciences institution, we show that student satisfaction with blended learning depends largely on the challenges presented by the subject matter, the degree to which self-directed learning and problem solving are required, and the effectiveness of the chosen pedagogies by which face-to-face and online methods are combined. Blended environments that provide multiple modalities for learning, significant interactivity, familiar technologies, and sustained connections with teachers and peers are preferred by increasing numbers of students in this institution. Although many students and faculty remain skeptical about blended learning, there are others who are very satisfied learners.


Author(s):  
Minaz Fazal ◽  
Bryan Panzano ◽  
Kristy Luk ◽  
Melanie Bryant

Author(s):  
Anastasiia Shuplat ◽  
Margaryta Noskova

The need in combination of digital technologies and traditional training techniques for ensuring effective learning process in education has becoming particularly relevant in the context of dynamic changes and community digitalization. Such an educational technology that combine digital technologies and traditional training techniques and provide educational environment for active learning is blended learning. One of criteria which influence the providing of an effective blended learning environment is evaluation. The purpose of this article is to analyse the main criteria and a number of frameworks for evaluating blended learning effectiveness, of the educational process in particular, which combines traditional (face-to-face) educational process, distance learning technologies and some elements of the web-based learning. According to the purpose, the tasks have been assigned and fulfilled as follows: we have examined the role of evaluating blended learning in educational institutions to determine the effectiveness of this learning technology, we have identified the major problems that need to be solved, we have scaled positive practices of blended learning to improve teaching and learning. The outlined models and criteria for the evaluation of blended learning effectiveness are specified in this article. The authors represent the objective and structured characteristics which are used for measuring the blended learning course effectiveness as well as for improving the educational programs and teaching / learning process in educational institutions in order to engage students, improve their learning outcome and achieve the course’s learning objectives. The authors also have formulated and substantiated the definition of the blended learning effectiveness as a complex process, which involves comprehensive analysis of a number of criteria: the combination of the data regulating the course outcomes, the measures determining the learners’ satisfaction with their results, the learners’ engagement into the educational environment and evaluation of their theoretical and practical skills.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document