The Effects of University Student’s Maladaptive Perfectionism and Emotional Dysregulation on Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: Mediation Effect of Experiential Avoidance

Author(s):  
Seul-Bit Pi ◽  
Kee-Hwan Park
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 700-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel C. Manos ◽  
Shawn P. Cahill ◽  
Chad T. Wetterneck ◽  
Christine A. Conelea ◽  
Ashley R. Ross ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Jelinek ◽  
Anja S. Göritz ◽  
Franziska Miegel ◽  
Steffen Moritz ◽  
Levente Kriston

AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with an increase in obsessive-compulsive disorder/symptoms (OCD/OCS). However, knowledge is limited regarding the trajectories of OCS during the pandemic, as well as their predictors and mechanisms (e.g., experiential avoidance, EA). The aim of this study was to describe the trajectories of OCS and the identification of associated factors. We assessed 1207 participants of the general population in March 2020 (t1) and June 2020 (t2). Pre-pandemic data was available from March 2014 for a subsample (n = 519). To define trajectories, we determined OCS status (OCS+/−). We performed a hierarchical multinomial logistic regression to investigate predictors of trajectories. Between t1 and t2, 66% of participants had an asymptomatic trajectory (OCS−/OCS−); 18% had a continuously symptomatic trajectory (OCS+/OCS+). Ten percent had a delayed-onset trajectory (OCS−/OCS+), and the recovery trajectory group (OCS+/OCS−) was the smallest group (6%). Higher education reduced the odds of an OCS+/OCS− trajectory. OCS in 2014 was associated with increased odds of showing an OCS+/OCS+ or OCS−/OCS+ trajectory. When EA at t1 and change in EA from t1 to t2 were added to the model, higher EA at t1 was associated with increased odds of scoring above the cut score on one or more of the assessments. A higher decrease in EA from t1 to t2 reduced the probability of showing an OCS+/OCS+ and an OCS−/OCS+ trajectory. While the current data supports a slight increase in OCS during the pandemic, trajectories differed, and EA seems to represent an important predictor for an unfavorable development.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 137-143
Author(s):  
Heidi J. Ojalehto ◽  
Samantha N. Hellberg ◽  
Megan W. Butcher ◽  
Jennifer L. Buchholz ◽  
Kiara R. Timpano ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai Xiong ◽  
Xiong Lai ◽  
Siliang Wu ◽  
Xin Yuan ◽  
Jun Tang ◽  
...  

Objective: This study aimed to explore the relationship among cognitive fusion, experiential avoidance, and obsessive–compulsive symptoms in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD).Methods: A total of 118 outpatient and inpatient patients with OCD and 109 healthy participants, gender- and age-matched, were selected using cognitive fusion questionnaire (CFQ), acceptance and action questionnaire−2nd edition (AAQ-II), Yale–Brown scale for obsessive–compulsive symptoms, Hamilton anxiety scale, and Hamilton depression scale for questionnaire testing and data analysis.Results: The levels of cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance in the OCD group were significantly higher than those in the healthy control group (P < 0.05). Regression analysis results showed that, in predicting the total score of obsessive–compulsive symptoms, AAQ-II (β = 0.233, P < 0.05) and CFQ (β = 0.262, P < 0.01) entered the equation, which explained 17.1% variance. In predicting anxiety, only AAQ-II (β = 0.222, P < 0.05) entered the equation, which explained 13% variance. In the prediction of depression, AAQ-II (β = 0.412, P < 0.001) entered the equation, which explained 17.7% variance.Conclusion: Cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance may be important factors for the maintenance of OCD, and experiential avoidance can positively predict the anxiety and depression of OCD patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document