A Case Study of English Language Teacher’s Practices and Beliefs about Oral Corrective Feedback

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 937-966
Author(s):  
Azimbayeva Assem ◽  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
Tleuov Askat
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback

scholarly journals EFL Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Oral Corrective Feedback: A Case Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
Lizbeth Gómez Argüelles ◽  
Edith Hernández Méndez ◽  
Moisés D. Perales Escudero
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
English Language Teaching ◽  
College Level ◽  
Southern Mexico ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Feedback Strategies ◽  
Teachers Attitudes

This paper reports a qualitative case study of college-level English as a foreign language teachers’ attitudes towards oral corrective feedback. Our goal is to characterize such attitudes considering a model which integrates cognitive, affective and conative components as well as different aspects of oral corrective feedback. Six English instructors working in English language teaching at a university in southern Mexico were interviewed. Directed qualitative content analysis shows that (1) participants prefer implicit corrective feedback strategies, and (2) considerations of students’ feelings guide their overall attitudes toward corrective feedback. The participants seem unaware of most corrective feedback strategies and consideration of students’ cognition is absent in the composition of their corrective feedback attitudes. This finding suggests a need for more theory-based corrective feedback training and practice.

Teaching English as an additional language: a case study approach

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evanthia Tsaliki
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Methods ◽  
English Language ◽  
Research Question ◽  
National Curriculum ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Teaching English ◽  
Case Study Approach ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Study Approach

Purpose This paper aims to deal with the processes and experiences of teaching English as an additional language (AL). More specifically, it deals with the research question of which teaching methods are used when teaching English as AL and why. Design/methodology/approach It concerns a case study approach conducted in an English primary school situated in North Yorkshire, where bilingual pupils also participate. The research methods used include observations in the classroom and in the playground, interviews with the teachers and the bilingual pupils of the school, as well as analysis of policy school documentation related to the topic examined. Findings The picture revealed by this study suggests that a number of different approaches and teaching methods, which contribute to teaching English as an AL, are used. The results indicate that great importance is attributed to teacher-pupil and pupil-pupil interaction, as well as to the employment of specific teaching techniques such as key visuals, corrective feedback. In addition, certain types of questions are addressed to bilingual pupils depending on their current language proficiency level. Teachers seem to emphasise the significance of activating the prior knowledge of non-native speakers (NNS). Progression in the content of the activities set, motivation and differentiation are seen as important. The implementation of the aforementioned approaches and teaching methods are supported by the policy and organisation of the school, where the research study was conducted. Originality/value As stated in the National Curriculum and within the framework of inclusion, all pupils for whom English is not their first language have to be provided with opportunities to develop the English language, the acquisition of which will help them to have access and take part in all subject areas. The present study explores what certain teaching approaches and methods can provide NNS with equal opportunities to develop English as an AL and why.

An Investigation of Native and Non-Native English-Speaking Teachers' Cognitions about Oral Corrective Feedback

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Maha Alhaysony
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Native Speakers ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Language Teachers ◽  
Experienced Teachers ◽  
Frequent Use ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Native English Speaking Teachers ◽  
Preparatory Year

The present study sought to compare and contrast the perception of native and non-native speakers and experienced and less experienced teachers about CF and to examine controversial issues, such as frequency of CF, timing of CF, types of oral errors that should be corrected, its methods, and the person who should do the correcting. Ninety-nine English language teachers teaching in the preparatory year at Ha’il University participated in the study completed a questionnaire and involved in a semi structured interview. The findings showed that teachers in general have a strong positive perception of oral CF. Although teachers preferred to correct serious errors and frequent errors most frequently, they tended to delay correction until after a student finishes speaking rather than immediately. Moreover, results indicated that elicitation, implicit and repetition were the most frequently used feedback across all types of teachers. The students preferred the CF provided by the teachers. Classmates or peers were the least popular. Further, the results did not show significant differences between types of teachers, except for ‘frequent errors, and infrequent errors’ where native speakers tended to correct them more than non-native speakers. Additionally, less experienced teachers had more frequent use of CF and used the metalinguistic feedback method more compared to experienced teachers. Implication for teaching speaking are also discussed.

The Effect of Immediate vs. Delayed Oral Corrective Feedback on the Writing Accuracy of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 1780
Author(s):  
Hasti Yasaei
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Writing Accuracy ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Experimental Group

This research used the quasi-experimental design to investigate the effects of immediate vs. delayed oral corrective feedback (CF) on the writing accuracy of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. A Nelson English Language Test (section 200 A) was used to homogenize three classes, two of which then were randomly assigned to experimental group and one to control group. During the treatment, the experimental group 1 received immediate oral CF through a face-to-face negotiation between the teacher and each individual after an error was made by a learner. The experimental group 2 received delayed oral CF in which learners received oral CF some time after an error was made by a learner. The control group received direct correction. After a 16-session treatment, the results of the post-test indicated a significant difference between the three groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document