scholarly journals To assess the role of VIT. D3 in proximal femur Fracture in elderly patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-448
Author(s):  
Dr. Surendra Kumar ◽  
Dr. Shashank Tomar ◽  
Dr. Sanjay Chaudhary ◽  
Dr. Ashok Yadav ◽  
Dr. Anil Yadav
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chul-Young Jang ◽  
Dae-Kyung Kwak ◽  
Dae-Hwan Kim ◽  
Hyung-Min Lee ◽  
Ji-Hyo Hwang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Katharina Hill-Mündel ◽  
Johannes Schlegl ◽  
Hans Konrad Biesalski ◽  
Sabrina Ehnert ◽  
Steffen Schröter ◽  
...  

Proximal femur fractures show a high prevalence in elderly patients and are associated with an elevated risk of multimorbidity and early mortality. Recovery is impaired by malnutrition and oxidative stress, which is affected by antioxidants such as ascorbic acid (AA). This study monitored AA levels during hospitalization of patients with a proximal femur to investigate the influence of AA status to the clinical outcome. AA levels of 25 elderly patients with a proximal femur fracture were measured during hospitalization using high performance liquid chromatography. Plasma samples were collected preoperatively, on the first day after surgery, on the third day after surgery and on the day of discharge. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) were assessed to evaluate the nutritional status. In patients with proximal femoral fractures, preoperative AA concentrations were significantly lower compared to elderly patients without an acute fracture. A significant decrease of 33.8% in AA plasma level was measured on the day after surgery with a significant recovery up to the time of discharge. The preoperative AA status did not have any significant effect on clinical outcome. However, inadequate AA levels (<50 µmol/L) upon discharge significantly increased the incidence and the severity of postoperative complications. These results indicate that the AA status upon discharge has a greater impact on clinical outcome than assumed, and therefore, AA supplementation during hospitalization should be considered.


2013 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Nakai ◽  
Kunihiko Hashimoto ◽  
Atsunori Onishi ◽  
Toshiyuki Nakamura ◽  
Akira Miyama ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Maria Muñoz Vives ◽  
Montsant Jornet-Gibert ◽  
J. Cámara-Cabrera ◽  
Pedro L. Esteban ◽  
Laia Brunet ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Khushdeep S. Vig ◽  
Curtis Adams ◽  
Joseph R. Young ◽  
Eric Perloff ◽  
Casey M. O’Connor ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dante Dallari ◽  
Luigi Zagra ◽  
Pietro Cimatti ◽  
Nicola Guindani ◽  
Rocco D’Apolito ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Treatment of hip fractures during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unique challenges for the management of COVID-19-infected patients and the maintenance of standards of care. The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the mortality rate at 1 month after surgery in symptomatic COVID-positive patients with that of asymptomatic patients. A secondary endpoint of the study is to evaluate, in the two groups of patients, mortality at 1 month on the basis of type of fracture and type of surgical treatment. Materials and methods For this retrospective multicentre study, we reviewed the medical records of patients hospitalised for proximal femur fracture at 14 hospitals in Northern Italy. Two groups were formed: COVID-19-positive patients (C+ group) presented symptoms, had a positive swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and received treatment for COVID-19; COVID-19-negative patients (C− group) were asymptomatic and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The two groups were compared for differences in time to surgery, survival rate and complications rate. The follow-up period was 1 month. Results Of the 1390 patients admitted for acute care for any reason, 477 had a proximal femur fracture; 53 were C+ but only 12/53 were diagnosed as such at admission. The mean age was > 80 years, and the mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 3 in both groups. There was no substantial difference in time to surgery (on average, 2.3 days for the C+ group and 2.8 for the C− group). As expected, a higher mortality rate was recorded for the C+ group but not associated with the type of hip fracture or treatment. No correlation was found between early treatment (< 48 h to surgery) and better outcome in the C+ group. Conclusions Hip fracture in COVID-19-positive patients accounted for 11% of the total. On average, the time to surgery was > 48 h, which reflects the difficulty of maintaining normal workflow during a medical emergency such as the present pandemic and notwithstanding the suspension of non-urgent procedures. Hip fracture was associated with a higher 30-day mortality rate in COVID-19-positive patients than in COVID-19-negative patients. This fact should be considered when communicating with patients and/or their family. Our data suggest no substantial difference in hip fracture management between patients with or without COVID-19 infection. In this sample, the COVID-19-positive patients were generally asymptomatic at admission; therefore, routine screening is recommended. Level of evidence Therapeutic study, level 4.


Vrach ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
A. Antonov ◽  
E. Solod ◽  
A. Lazarev ◽  
D. Vychuzhanin ◽  
R. Gorenkov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document