Empirical Research about How Starred Hotel Customer Repurchase Intention is Expected to be Affected by Service Failure, Service Restructuring, and Customer Satisfaction

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 47-66
Author(s):  
Wenjuan Huyan ◽  
Guanghao Yan ◽  
Lindong Xu
Keyword(s):  
Customer Satisfaction ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Service Failure ◽  
Repurchase Intention

scholarly journals The mediating influence of service failure explanation on customer repurchase intention through customers satisfaction

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar Tarofder ◽  
Seyed Rajab Nikhashemi ◽  
S.M. Ferdous Azam ◽  
Prashantini Selvantharan ◽  
Ahasanul Haque
Keyword(s):  
Customer Satisfaction ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Service Failure ◽  
Mediating Effect ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Repurchase Intention ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Practical Tool ◽  
Customer Purchases

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of explanation on customer satisfaction in the service failure stage. It seeks to better understand the dynamics of consumer repurchase intention through a mediating effect of customer satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach A structured questionnaire was e-mailed to collect the primary data. With three reminders, this study managed to obtain 322 responses from customers who complained about their internet service in Malaysia. Structural equation modelling techniques were applied to examine both direct and mediating effects between variables. Findings Results reveal that all four dimensions of explanation have significant partial mediating effect on repurchase intention through customer satisfaction. Results also disclose that there is no significant relationship between excuse and customer satisfaction in service failure. Among all dimensions, reference and apology have higher influence on repurchase intention through customer satisfaction. Research limitations/implications The results are particularly valuable for managers, as it supports the role of using explanation as a practical tool for fostering positive and profitable outcomes like repeat customer purchases. Practical implications The findings of this study will help organisations rethink their explanation strategies with the eye to foster greater customer repurchase intention. Originality/value The results are particularly valuable for managers, as they support the role of using explanation as a practical tool for fostering positive and profitable outcomes like repeat customer purchases.

Equity and repurchase intention following service failure

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 513-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Palmer ◽  
Rosalind Beggs ◽  
Caroline Keown‐McMullan
Keyword(s):  
Service Failure ◽  
Repurchase Intention

Service recovery for moderate and high involvement services

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 331-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silke Bambauer-Sachse ◽  
Landisoa Eunorphie Rabeson
Keyword(s):  
Customer Satisfaction ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Service Failure ◽  
Service Recovery ◽  
Level Of Service ◽  
High Involvement ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Failure Severity ◽  
Future Consumption ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to determine which level of tangible compensation for a service failure leads to high levels of customer satisfaction for moderate- versus high-involvement services as well as for different conditions of responsibility for the failure and failure severity. Design/methodology/approach – The study is based on a 4 (tangible compensation: gift, discount, credit for future consumption, refund) × 2 (responsibility for the failure: restaurant vs customer) × 2 (failure severity: low vs high) × 2 (involvement: moderate vs high) design using scenarios in a restaurant context. Findings – The results reveal that, for moderate-involvement services, all types of compensation are equally appropriate, except for when customers are responsible for a severe failure. In this condition, they expect tangible compensation of higher benefit. For high-involvement services, the more severe the failure, the higher the benefit of tangible compensation should be, independent of responsibility. Practical implications – The findings suggest that managers should consider the level of service involvement as well as responsibility for and severity of the failure when choosing the level of tangible compensation. Originality/value – The results of this study provide new insights into how to choose appropriate and efficient service recovery measures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document