scholarly journals Riset Implementasi (Implementation Research) Sebagai Metodologi Riset Untuk Mengawal Kebijakan

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-145
Author(s):  
Siswanto Siswanto
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Implementation Research ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Critical Realism ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
The Real ◽  
Program Intervention

The appropriate approach for operational research is by using problem solving cycle model, comprising (i) measuring the magnitude of the problem, (ii) identifying the causes of the problem, (iii) developing the solution, (iv) implementing program/ intervention, and (v) evaluating the program. Within a scientific perspective, in every phase of problem solving cycle, it needs research, including the fourth phase i.e. implementing program/ intervention. Research that provide scientific evidence for better implementation is labeled as Implementation Research. As a methodological approach, Implementation Research belongs to critical realism paradigm that is possible to use mixed method (combination of qualitative and quantitative), or stand alone of qualitative method, or quantitative method. The role of Implementation Research is very crucial for better implementation or for better scale-up of the program by understanding the implementation process as well as the impact of the program under concern. Participatory action research, as one of the Implementation Research approach, can be used as an appropriate methodology for better implementation in the real context of the new policy (new program) by tailoring the implementation process (management process) with the real world situation in terms of policy actors, organizational situation, human resources variable, community variable, as well as, resources variable. Abstrak Pendekatan yang tepat untuk riset operasioanl adalah melalui siklus pemecahan masalah terdiri dari (i) mengukur besaran masalah, (ii) mencari penyebab masalah, (iii) mengembangkan solusi, (iv) implementasi intervensi/ program, dan (v) evaluasi program. Dalam perspektif ilmiah, maka dalam setiap tahapan siklus pemecahan masalah memerlukan penelitian, termasuk tahap keempat yakni tahapan implementasi program. Penelitian yang menyediakan bukti ilmiah untuk implementasi program disebut dengan Riset Implementasi (Implementation Research).  Sebagai pendekatan metodologi, Riset Implementasi termasuk dalam paradigma realisme kritis (critical realism), yang memungkinkan untuk menggunakan metoda campuran (mixed method) (kombinasi kuantitatif dan kualitatif), atau secara senidri hanya menggunakan kuantitatif, atau kualitatif saja. Peran Riset Implementasi menjadi sangat penting untuk mendapatkan cara-cara implementasi yang lebih baik, atau dalam rangka memperluas jangkauan progam, guna mempelajari proses implementasi dan melihat dampak program sebagaimana diinginkan. Riset tindak partisipatif (Participatory action research), dapat dipergunakan sebagai metodologi yang tepat untuk mendapatkan cara-cara implementasi yang lebih baik dalam konteks penerapan kebijakan/ progam baru, dengan menyesuaikan proses implementasi (proses manajemen) disesuaikan dengan situasi dunia nyata di lapangan, berkaitan dengan aktor kebijakan, situasi organisasi, variasi sumber daya manusia, variasi masyarakat, maupun variasi sumber daya lainnya.

Using Mixed-Method Survey Data to Enrich Participatory Action Research

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant C. Griffin ◽  
Molly D. Nackley
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Participatory Action

scholarly journals Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luci K Leykum ◽  
Jacqueline A Pugh ◽  
Holly J Lanham ◽  
Joel Harmon ◽  
Reuben R McDaniel
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Implementation Research ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Experiences and Effects of Structurally Involving Residents in the Nursing Home by Means of Participatory Action Research: A Mixed Method Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 495-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lien Van Malderen ◽  
Patricia De Vriendt ◽  
Tony Mets ◽  
Dominique Verté ◽  
Ellen Gorus
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Action Research ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Mixed Method Study ◽  
Participatory Action

scholarly journals Guiding principles for quality, ethical standards and ongoing learning in implementation research: multicountry learnings from participatory action research to strengthen health systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii137-ii149
Author(s):  
Kim Ozano ◽  
Laura Dean ◽  
Oluwatosin Adekeye ◽  
Anthony K Bettee ◽  
Ruth Dixon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Health System ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Implementation Research ◽  
Health Systems Strengthening ◽  
Ethical Standards ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Implementation Challenges ◽  
Guiding Principles

Abstract Global health gains can be achieved through strengthening health systems to identify and address implementation challenges in low- and middle-income countries. Participatory research, that promotes joint problem and solution finding between communities and different health systems actors, supports policy implementation analysis at all levels. Within the neglected tropical disease programmes in Liberia and Nigeria, we applied participatory action research (PAR) to address programmatic and health system bottlenecks with health systems strengthening embedded. This paper shares learning from 20 interviews with co-researchers, from national and sub-national levels and academic researchers who worked collaboratively to understand challenges, co-create solutions and advocate for policy change. Through analysis and reflections of existing PAR principles, we inductively identified five additional guiding principles for quality, ethical standards and ongoing learning within PAR projects that aim to strengthen health systems. (1) Recognize communities as units of identity and define stakeholder participation to ensure equitable engagement of all actors; (2) enable flexible action planning that builds on existing structures whilst providing opportunities for embedding change; (3) address health systems and research power differentials that can impede co-production of knowledge and solution development; (4) embed relational practices that lead to new political forms of participation and inquiry within health systems and (5) develop structures for ongoing learning at multiple levels of the health system. PAR can strengthen health systems by connecting and co-creating potentially sustainable solutions to implementation challenges. Additional research to explore how these five additional principles can support the attainment of quality and ethical standards within implementation research using a PAR framework for health systems strengthening is needed.

scholarly journals Participatory action research for global antibiotic stewardship network in CPLP: mixed-method study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Maia ◽  
L V Lapão
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Action Research ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Educational Program ◽  
Mixed Method Study ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Support Information

Abstract Background Antibiotic stewardship services (ABS) contribute to antibiotic resistance (AR) global monitoring. Aiming at co-implement an ABS network within the Portuguese-speaking setting (CPLP), by enabling the evidence translation and second opinion between the countries, we surveyed Cape Verdean (CV) health professionals (HP) perceptions about AR prevention and control, assessing ABS opportunities. Methods A Design Science with Participatory Action Research establishes a contextualized ABS process. This mixed-method study addressed the first 2 stages, the problem and objectives. Quantitative study considered the HP’s answers (56 HP; 2 hospitals) to a questionnaire, about their perception on AR and ABS. Qualitative study set-up 10 open-ended structured interviews, clinical shift observation in 2 pilot-services (1 hospital), and meetings with key-elements for ABS, including leadership. Results Key-stakeholders for ABS multidisciplinary teamwork were identified. Preliminary results are: 1. HP reveal some knowledge but lack of awareness on AR and ABS (eg. 34% don’t recognize the AR local threat); 2. The absence of guidelines and lack of access to key-information affect prescribing confidence (eg. only 46% HP consider microbiology results in deciding antibiotherapy); 3. Priorities for a pilot service are the lack of qualified HP, the need to optimize material resources management and stock procurement, and the need for better access to patient’s clinical and prescription information; 4. Digital resources and telemedicine system can be facilitators. Top-down communication and support are essential for the ABS process sustainability. Conclusions A Global ABS network can be important in promoting prevention and effective control of AR, reducing differences between the CPLP countries. In CV, an educational program to support the co-design of ABS service and a decision-support information system are identified priorities. Digital health, like telemedicine, can be ABS facilitators. Key messages The implementation of a Global Antibiotic Stewardship network, aiming at reducing Portuguese-speaking Countries differences, could be leveraged by a Participatory Action Research process. An educational program, a decision-support information system and the telemedicine are key for the Global Antibiotic Stewardship network implementation success.

Developing Theory From Complexity: Reflections on a Collaborative Mixed Method Participatory Action Research Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 701-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Westhues ◽  
Joanna Ochocka ◽  
Nora Jacobson ◽  
Laura Simich ◽  
Sarah Maiter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Action Research Study

scholarly journals Development and Evaluation of a Preceptor Education Program Based on the One-Minute Preceptor Model: Participatory Action Research

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (21) ◽  
pp. 11376
Author(s):  
Hye Won Jeong ◽  
Deok Ju ◽  
Myoung Lee Choi ◽  
Suhyun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Core Competency ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Qualitative Approaches ◽  
Action Research Approach ◽  
The One

This participatory action research study was conducted to confirm the implementation process and effect of developing and applying a preceptor education program based on the One-Minute Preceptor Model to foster the competence of preceptor clinical nurses. The study was conducted for eight weeks from March 2020 on 30 preceptor nurses in South Korea. Nursing standards were developed for two weeks and six cycles (comprising four stages) were performed. Data collection was integrated using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. For quantitative data, the Clinical Core Competency of Preceptor (CCCP) and General Communication Competence Scale (GICC-15) results were collected from preceptor nurses through questionnaires. Reflection journals of nurses’ experiences were also analyzed through content analysis and frequency of keywords using WordClouds. There was no significant change in CCCP or GICC-15 results among preceptor nurses. However, nurses’ experiences were associated with the growth and development of competencies such as evidence-based practice, quality feedback, and self-reflection. The program was effective in developing nurse competencies. Therefore, it is necessary to encourage One-Minute Preceptor Model activities among preceptors through an action research approach and to actively support research and practice in clinical settings, as well as to provide organizational and systematic support.

Health Capability Deprivations in a Rural Swazi Community: Understanding Complexity With Theoretically Informed, Qualitatively Driven, Mixed-Method Design, Participatory Action Research

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1897-1909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle R. Brear ◽  
Pinky N. Shabangu ◽  
Jane R. Fisher ◽  
Karin Hammarberg ◽  
Helen M. Keleher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Mixed Method Design

scholarly journals Researching Alienation

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-38
Author(s):  
Mike Healy
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Participatory Action Research ◽  
Critical Realism ◽  
End Users ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Secondary Literature ◽  
Ethical Implications ◽  
Positivist Approach

In this chapter, the author outlines a way to research Marx’s approach to alienation that moves beyond polemics. In doing so, he describes his chosen method of collecting, analysing and presenting data setting out the rationale for his chosen methodology, critical realism (CR), underpinned with participatory action research (PAR). The chapter also provides a description of the organisations of the book’s three research settings, whilst also detailing the processes involved in obtaining the appropriate data. The research aimed to ask whether Marx’s approach can explain lived alienated experiences of groups in three distinct settings: ICT professionals, academics researching the ethical implications of ICT, and senior end-users. The author determines that several of his findings and secondary literature have informed his rejection of a positivist approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document