scholarly journals Decision Usefulness of Net Income versus Comprehensive Income: Case of Financial Firms in Malaysia

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-244
Author(s):  
Chong Leong Yew ◽  
Ahmed Razman Abdul Latiff
Keyword(s):  
Net Income ◽  
Decision Usefulness ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
Comprehensive Income

DİĞER KAPSAMLI GELİR KALEMLERİ İLE İŞLETMENİN PİYASA DEĞERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 269
Author(s):  
Serhan Gürkan ◽  
Yasemin Köse
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Comprehensive Income ◽  
Income Statement ◽  
Other Comprehensive Income ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Gains And Losses

Other comprehensive income is the difference between net income as in the Income Statement and comprehensive income, and represents the certain gains and losses of the enterprise not recognized in the Profit or Loss Account. Value relevance of other comprehensive income is under discussion and considering other comprehensive income items all together might be misleading for financial performance. In the view of such information, discussing the value relevance of each other comprehensive income item, judgements are made.

Risk-Relevance of Fair-Value Income Measures for Commercial Banks

2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie D. Hodder ◽  
Patrick E. Hopkins ◽  
James M. Wahlen
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Income Volatility ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Market Pricing ◽  
Share Prices ◽  
Comprehensive Income

We investigate the risk relevance of the standard deviation of three performance measures: net income, comprehensive income, and a constructed measure of full-fair-value income for a sample of 202 U.S. commercial banks from 1996 to 2004. We find that, for the average sample bank, the volatility of full-fair-value income is more than three times that of comprehensive income and more than five times that of net income. We find that the incremental volatility in full-fair-value income (beyond the volatility of net income and comprehensive income) is positively related to marketmodel beta, the standard deviation in stock returns, and long-term interest-rate beta. Further, we predict and find that the incremental volatility in full-fair-value income (1) negatively moderates the relation between abnormal earnings and banks' share prices and (2) positively affects the expected return implicit in bank share prices. Our findings suggest full-fair-value income volatility reflects elements of risk that are not captured by volatility in net income or comprehensive income, and relates more closely to capital-market pricing of that risk than either net-income volatility or comprehensiveincome volatility.

scholarly journals Value relevance of accounting data and financial crisis in Europe: an empirical analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Devalle
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Accounting Data ◽  
Book Value ◽  
Crisis Period ◽  
Comprehensive Income ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

This paper aims at verifying the relationship between book value and  market value for a four years period (2006-2009) in Europe, under IFRS. In particular, I used value relevance approach to measure whether net income or comprehensive income are more useful to understand the relationship between market data and financial data. Moreover, the paper analyzes the impact of financial crisis on the value relevance of accounting data. The examination period runs from a pre-crisis period (2006-2007) to an in-crisis period (2008-2009). Results shows that comprehensive income is more value relevant than net income. Furthermore, the financial crisis has a positive impact on value relevance.  

scholarly journals Corporate Reporting of Other Comprehensive Income

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 212
Author(s):  
Charles Mulford ◽  
Anna Babinets
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Income Loss ◽  
Future Earnings ◽  
Corporate Reporting ◽  
Comprehensive Income ◽  
Other Comprehensive Income ◽  
Gains And Losses

In this study, we examine the annual report filings of S&P 100 companies that report other comprehensive income/(loss) over the three-year period of 2013-2015. We seek to gain a deeper understanding of the components of other comprehensive income and to determine if there is a systematic tendency for companies to include more gains or losses in other comprehensive income. Further, we seek to determine which components of other comprehensive income show more unexpected losses than gains and what impact other comprehensive income gains and losses may have on future earnings.We find a systematic tendency for firms to report more losses than gains in other comprehensive income, both in frequency and amount. This result is especially true for investment-related gains and losses, where managements have more discretion in the timing of gain and loss recognition.In terms of their impact on future earnings, we find that 43 companies in the S&P 100 reclassified some component of accumulated other comprehensive income gains and losses to net income over the period 2013- 2015, highlighting the observation that other comprehensive income gains and losses are, in effect, future elements of net income. These results remind analysts and investors that net income does not tell the entire story of a firm’s financial performance. Beyond users of financial statements, regulators, such as the FASB and SEC, may want to reconsider whether items of other comprehensive income should be included in net income.

scholarly journals Value Relevance of net income, other comprehensive income, and comprehensive income in Brazil

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Cassiana Bortoli ◽  
Alcido Manuel Juaniha ◽  
Jorge Eduardo Scarpin ◽  
Nayane Thais Krespi Musial ◽  
Claudio Marcelo Edwards Barros
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Standard Errors ◽  
Positive Contribution ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Control Variables ◽  
Gross Domestic Product Growth ◽  
Comprehensive Income ◽  
Other Comprehensive Income

This paper uses the Ohlson Model to analyze whether Net Income (NI), Other Comprehensive Income (OCI), and Comprehensive Income (CI) are value relevant for market value and the return of shares of publicy-traded Brazilian companies. To maximize the robustness of the results, we inserted the following control variables for each model: equity per Share (EqPS), Size (S), Industry (I), EBITDA per Share (EbPS), Revenue per Share (RePS), Liquidity (L), and Gross Domestic Product Growth (GDPG). The control variables S, RePS, and GDPG were significant for the three models related to the value of the company. The control variables EqPS, EbPS, RePS, and L, on the other hand, were only significant for the three models related to stock returns. Our main variables (NI, OCI, and CI) were found to be statistically significant in five of the six regression models after data analysis in a fixed effect panel using robust standard errors. However, only the variables NI and CI were considered to be relevant in the expected direction, meaning that they offered a positive contribution in explaining the value of the company.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document