scholarly journals Road accessibility problem as part of land consolidation planning

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaroslaw Janus ◽  
Piotr Bozek ◽  
Jaroslaw Taszakowski ◽  
Agnieszka Glowacka
Keyword(s):  
Land Consolidation ◽  
Accessibility Problem

Problems and Proposed Solutions Derived from Uncertainties in the Land Consolidation Law

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahsin BOZTOPRAK ◽  
Osman DEMİR ◽  
Yakup Emre ÇORUHLU
Keyword(s):  
Land Consolidation

Land consolidation, specialization, and household diets: Evidence from Rwanda

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Keyword(s):  
Land Consolidation

Current Land Tenure and Households’ Perspectives to Voluntary Land Consolidation in South East Ethiopia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teshome Beyene Leta ◽  
Arega Bazezew Berlie ◽  
Mehrete Belay Ferede
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Land Consolidation

A method of intelligent 3-D aided planning for land consolidation

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruoming Shi ◽  
Can Chen ◽  
Ling Zhu ◽  
Xihan Mu
Keyword(s):  
Land Consolidation

Status Analysis of Linpan Protection in Land Consolidation of Chengdu Plain

2013 ◽  
Vol 357-360 ◽  
pp. 2118-2121
Author(s):  
Ling Li Jia ◽  
Heng Cui
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Conservation ◽  
Land Consolidation ◽  
Architectural Style ◽  
Evaluation Standard ◽  
The Public ◽  
Chengdu Plain ◽  
Settlement Type ◽  
Comprehensive Development ◽  
Status Analysis

In the process of land consolidation in Chengdu Plain, Linpan protection is an important content. At present, some protection types of Linpan have been formed in Chengdu area, such as agriculture, rural tourism, special industry and settlement type and so on. Many protected modes were explored, such as the natural subsidies, in situ conservation, comprehensive development, off-site reconstruction, etc. But there are still some questions, do not pay attention to protect Linpan ecological pattern plate function transformation, the architectural style of hybrid, protection methods are not flexible, evaluation standard is not perfect, the public participation is not enough and other issues, these problems need to be continuously optimized and improved in the future.

scholarly journals Erosion Transportation Processes as Influenced by Gully Land Consolidation Projects in Highly Managed Small Watersheds in the Loess Hilly–Gully Region, China

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1540
Author(s):  
Qianqian Ji ◽  
Zhe Gao ◽  
Xingyao Li ◽  
Jian’en Gao ◽  
Gen’guang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Similarity Theory ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Simulation Method ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Land Consolidation ◽  
Small Watershed ◽  
Flood Peak ◽  
Erosion Area ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Erosion Environment

The Loess Hilly–Gully region (LHGR) is the most serious soil erosion area in the world. For the small watershed with high management in this area, the scientific problem that has been paid attention to in recent years is the impact of the land consolidation project on the erosion environment in the gully region. In this study, the 3D simulation method of vegetation, eroded sediment and pollutant transport was innovated based on the principles of erosion sediment dynamics and similarity theory, and the impacts of GLCP were analyzed on the erosion environment at different scales. The verification results show that the design method and the scale conversion relationship (geometric scale: λl = 100) were reasonable and could simulate the transport process on the complex underlying surface of a small watershed. Compared with untreated watersheds, a significant change was the current flood peak lagging behind the sediment peak. There were two important critical values of GLCP impact on the erosion environment. The erosion transport in HMSW had no change when the proportion was less than 0.85%, and increased obviously when it was greater than 3.3%. The above results have important theoretical and practical significance for watershed simulation and land-use management in HMSW.

Implementation of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for interview problem in land consolidation: A case study in Konya/Turkey

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 105511
Author(s):  
Sifa Ozsari ◽  
Harun Uguz ◽  
Huseyin Hakli
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
Land Consolidation ◽  
Heuristic Optimization

An Evaluation System for Arable Land Consolidation Potential and its Application in China

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengfeng Zhang ◽  
Jinming Yan ◽  
Wenwu Zhao ◽  
Wei Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation System ◽  
Arable Land ◽  
Land Consolidation

scholarly journals Land Policy and Food Prices: Evidence from a Land Consolidation Program in Rwanda

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-73
Author(s):  
Aimable Nsabimana ◽  
Fidele Niyitanga ◽  
Dave D. Weatherspoon ◽  
Anwar Naseem
Keyword(s):  
Food Prices ◽  
Land Policy ◽  
Land Consolidation ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Food Crops ◽  
White Potato ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Price Differences ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Rwanda’s “Crop Intensification Program (CIP)” is primarily a land consolidation program aimed at improving agricultural productivity and food security. The program, which began in 2007, focuses on monocropping and commercialization of six priority crops: maize, wheat, rice, white potato, beans, and cassava. CIP has facilitated easy access to improved seed stocks, fertilizer, extension services, and postharvest handling and storage services. Although studies have documented the impact of CIP on changes in farm yield, incomes, and productivity, less is known about its impact on food prices. In this study, we examine the crop-food price differences in intensive monocropped CIP and non-intensive monocropped CIP zones in Rwanda. Specifically, the study evaluates price variations of beans and maize along with complementary food crops in intensive and non-intensive monocropped zones before and after the introduction of the CIP policy. We find that the CIP policy is not associated with differences in CIP crop prices between the intensive and non-intensive monocropped zones. Over time, prices increased for CIP crops but generally, the crop prices in the two zones were cointegrated. Prices for non-CIP crops in the two different zones did show price differentials prior to the implementation of CIP, with the prices in intensive monocropped zones being greater than in the non-intensive monocropped zones. Moreover, the prices in intensive areas are cointegrated with prices in non-intensive areas for maize and beans and these prices are converging. This indicates that farmers who intensively produced one CIP crop were able to go to the market and purchase other food crops and that price differences between zones have decreased over time, potentially making the CIP intensive farmers better off.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document