scholarly journals Impact of illness acceptance on the quality of life in cancer patients after surgical treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 338-343
Author(s):  
Barbara Budna ◽  
Zofia Bolanowska ◽  
Jan Juzwiszyn ◽  
Mariusz Chabowski
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Social Relationships ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Strong Conclusion ◽  
Repeated Surgery ◽  
Acceptance Of Illness ◽  
Acceptance Levels

Introduction/Objective. In Poland, cancers are the second most common cause of death. One in four Poles will have cancer in their life, and one in five will die from it. The purpose of the study was to assess the acceptance of illness and its impact on the quality of life in surgically treated cancer patients. Methods. The study included 123 cancer patients who had undergone surgical treatment between April and May of 2017. The most common were colon (33.3%) and breast cancer (31.7%). Sixty-five percent of the patients were only treated surgically. The Acceptance of Illness Scale, the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire, and an original survey were used. Results. Sixty-two patients (50.4%) presented high illness acceptance levels. More than half of the patients rated their quality of life as good (41.5%) or very good (13%). A positive correlation was found between the acceptance of illness and the quality of life scores in the physical health (R = 0.351, p < 0.001), psychological (R = 0.422, p < 0.001), social relationships (R = 0.525, p < 0.001), and environment (R = 0.533, p < 0.001) domains. In the physical and psychological domains, the correlation had moderate strength, while correlations with the social relationships and environment domains were strong. Conclusion. Higher illness acceptance levels were associated with higher quality of life. Acceptance of illness was not associated with patient age, type of treatment, or repeated surgery. Patients who lived alone had significantly lower quality of life and significantly lower acceptance of illness. Patients who had undergone their first surgery perceived their quality of life in the environment domain significantly lower.

Psychometric properties of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire in inpatient cancer rehabilitation in Germany

2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
JÖRG DIRMAIER ◽  
SILKE ZAUN ◽  
UWE KOCH ◽  
TIMO HARFST ◽  
HOLGER SCHULZ
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Scale Structure ◽  
Cancer Rehabilitation ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Objective: Recent years have shown an increase in the use of questionnaires measuring health-related quality of life to verify the quality of treatment in the field of oncology. An often used cancer-specific questionnaire is the “Quality of Life Core Questionnaire of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer” (EORTC QLQ-C30). The purpose of this study is to analyze the psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 1) in order to determine the feasibility and appropriateness for its use in inpatient cancer rehabilitation in Germany with heterogeneous diagnoses.Methods: The questionnaire was administrated to a sample of 972 cancer patients at the beginning of treatment and to 892 patients after treatment. Besides descriptive analysis, the statistical analyses include confirmatory analysis and the multitrait/multimethod approach to test the questionnaire's postulated scale structure (factorial validity) and its reliability (internal consistencies). The analysis also includes a comparison of responsiveness indices (effect size, reliable change index) to test the sensitivity of the instrument.Results: The EORTC QLQ-C30 showed satisfactory levels of reliability and sensitivity, but the postulated scale structure could not be confirmed. The results illustrate that the varimax-rotated solution of a principal component analysis does not confirm the scale structure postulated by the authors. Correspondingly, the selected fit indices within the scope of the confirmatory factor analysis do not show satisfactory results either.Significance of results: We therefore consider version 1 of the EORTC QLQ-C30 to be only limitedly useful for the routine assessment of changes in the quality of life of cancer patients in inpatient rehabilitation in Germany, especially because of the instrument's length and possible redundancies. For this reason, a scoring procedure limited to a subset of items is suggested, revealing satisfactory to good psychometric indices. However, further psychometric tests are necessary, especially with regard to validity and sensitivity.

Baseline characteristics of breast and gynecological cancer patients enrolled in the trial of a multidisciplinary survivorship care model in an Asian national ambulatory cancer center.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Yu Ke ◽  
Patricia Soek Hui Neo ◽  
Grace Meijuan Yang ◽  
Shirlynn Ho ◽  
Yee Pin Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

37 Background: Accessible Cancer Care to Enable Support for Cancer Survivors (ACCESS) is a multidisciplinary survivorship care model launched at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) in 2019. ACCESS employs routine distress and problem screening to triage cancer patients with varying care needs and complexities for tailored care. Here, we described the study design to evaluate ACCESS, and reported the baseline characteristics of our study cohort to characterize the profile of prospective target recipients of the new care model. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial was initiated to assess the effectiveness of ACCESS on quality of life and symptom burden, with each cluster unit defined at the oncologist level. Clusters were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ACCESS or usual care. Eligible patients were ≥21 years, newly diagnosed with breast or gynecological cancer, and receiving follow-up care in NCCS. Patients were followed up for one year and patient-reported outcomes were collected every three months using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. Results: By May 2021, 91 patients and 89 patients in the usual care and ACCESS arm were recruited, respectively. Both groups (usual care vs. ACCESS) had comparable mean age (56.2±10.9 vs. 56.2±10.7, P = 0.998) and racial composition (P = 0.760). Employment status was similar in both arms (48.4% vs. 56.2% employed, P = 0.293) and most patients were covered by health insurance (89.8% vs. 88.1%, P = 0.920). At baseline, patients in both arms had comparable mean quality of life scores (65.1±19.8 vs. 66.9±17.6, P = 0.51) and reported high physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning levels (all mean scores > 70). No statistically significant differences in physical symptom and psychological distress levels were observed. Prevalent symptoms reported included fatigue (82.4% vs. 71.9%), pain (68.1% vs. 55.1%), and insomnia (57.1% vs. 55.1%). Almost half of the cohort reported financial difficulties (45.1% vs. 46.1%). Conclusions: Comparable baseline characteristics suggested the absence of systematic differences in care needs and demand among patients cared by different oncologists. Despite high functioning statuses at baseline, participants reported impaired quality of life with active physical and financial problems. These results support our hypothesis that routine screening would be valuable to identify such problems promptly for management via standardized care pathways. Results from this ongoing trial will determine the effectiveness of ACCESS on quality of life and functional recovery through treatment and survivorship. Clinical trial information: NCT04014309.

Test/retest study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1249-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Hjermstad ◽  
S D Fossa ◽  
K Bjordal ◽  
S Kaasa
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

PURPOSE The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a well-validated instrument that assesses health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients. It is used in cancer clinical trials in Europe, Canada, and the United States, and has demonstrated high reliability and validity in different groups of cancer patients. Despite thorough testing of reliability and validity, we have not identified any reports on its test/retest reliability; thus, a test/retest study was performed at the Norwegian Radium Hospital (NRH). MATERIALS AND METHODS Cancer patients from the outpatient clinic who were off treatment for > or = 3 months were eligible for the study. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was given to the patients when they presented for their visit. The second questionnaire was received by the patients 4 days later. Of 291 eligible patients, 270 (93%) agreed to participate and 190 (73%) completed both questionnaires. RESULTS The test/retest reliability measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient was high for all functional scales, with a range from .82 for cognitive and role function to .91 for physical function. The r value for global HRQOL was .85. For the symptom scales--nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and pain--the coefficients were .63, .83, and .86, respectively. The single-item coefficients ranged from .72 for diarrhea to .84 for financial impact. The Spearman rank correlation was in the same range for all dimensions. CONCLUSION The EORTC QLQ-C30 seems to yield high test/retest reliability in patients with various cancer diagnoses whose condition is not expected to change during the time of measurement.

scholarly journals Quality of life among Ethiopian cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 5469-5478
Author(s):  
Yemataw Wondie ◽  
Andreas Hinz
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Purpose Cancer is of increasing prevalence in less-developed countries. However, research on the patients’ quality of life (QoL) in these countries is very limited. The aim of this study was to examine QoL of cancer patients in Africa. Method A sample of 256 cancer patients treated in an Ethiopian hospital was examined with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A group of 1664 German cancer patients served as a comparison group. Results Most of the scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 showed acceptable reliability in the Ethiopian sample. Compared with the German cancer patients, the Ethiopian patients showed lower QoL in most dimensions, especially in financial difficulties, physical functioning, pain, and appetite loss (effect sizes between 0.52 and 0.75). Illiteracy, tumor stage, and treatment (surgery and chemotherapy) were associated with QoL in the Ethiopian sample. QoL was strongly correlated with fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Conclusion The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a suitable instrument for measuring QoL in Ethiopia. The detriments in QoL in the Ethiopian patients indicate specific cancer care needs for the patients in a developing country.

scholarly journals The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire for cancer patients ( QLQ ‐C30): Australian general population reference values

2019 ◽  
Vol 210 (11) ◽  
pp. 499-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Mercieca‐Bebber ◽  
Daniel SJ Costa ◽  
Richard Norman ◽  
Monika Janda ◽  
David P Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
General Population ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Reference Values ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaire ◽  
Eortc Quality
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document