Effects of a Constant Time Delay Procedure on the Written Spelling Performance of a Learning Disabled Student

1987 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kay B. Stevens ◽  
John W. Schuster

A constant time delay procedure was used to teach written spelling to an 11-year-old, school-labeled LD youngster who had severe spelling deficits. The time delay procedure is a near errorless instructional method that transfers stimulus control from a controlling stimulus (a prompt that signals the correct response) to a new stimulus (a target response). As a result of a 5-second constant delay procedure the student acquired, maintained, and generalized 15 spelling words. The procedure is easy to implement, requires little teacher preparation time, and results in a low student error rate. In the absence of published time delay research with LD individuals, the results are encouraging. Based on our findings, the time delay procedure is a viable alternative for LD students who have not benefited from traditional instructional procedures. Since the results of this study and those in the unpublished literature indicate that the time delay procedure is effective, further examination with other LD students is warranted.

1993 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Gast ◽  
Belva C. Collins ◽  
Mark Wolery ◽  
Rebecca Jones

An investigation was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a constant-time-delay procedure used in combination with multiple exemplars of strangers, lures, and sites to teach a generalized response to the lures of strangers to four preschool children with disabilities. Although the correct response was quickly acquired in the training site, the response failed to generalize to the probe sites until training was conducted in vivo. Instruction in vivo resulted in acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of the response to strangers' lures. Generalization occurred across probes with novel exemplars of lures, strangers, and sites.


1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiabei Zhang ◽  
Michael Horvat ◽  
David L. Gast

It is imperative that teachers utilize effective and efficient instructional strategies to teach task-analyzed gross motor skills in physical education activities to individuals with severe disabilities. The purpose of this paper is to describe the constant time delay procedure, which has been shown to be effective in teaching task-analyzed fine motor skills in daily living and safety activities. In this article, guidelines are presented for teaching task-analyzed gross motor skills to individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. These guidelines are based on a review of the constant time delay procedure reported in the special education literature and current research being conducted by the authors.


1988 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Schuster ◽  
David L. Gast ◽  
Mark Wolery ◽  
Sharon Guiltinan

1990 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Alig-Cybriwsky ◽  
Mark Wolery ◽  
David L. Gast

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trudie A. Hughes ◽  
Laura D. Fredrick ◽  
Marie C. Keel

This study examined the effectiveness of a training procedure designed to teach a special education resource teacher the constant time delay procedures. In addition, the study examined the effectiveness of constant time delay procedures in teaching written spelling words to one 12-year-old male student with a learning disability. A multiple-probe design across behaviors was used to demonstrate the functional relationship between the time delay procedure and the student acquiring, maintaining, and generalizing 15 spelling words. The investigation specifically sought to address teacher-training issues related to instructional procedures, student acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. The teacher successfully implemented the procedure with 100% treatment integrity and the student learned to spell all 15 spelling words.


1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinda Jones Ault ◽  
David L. Gast ◽  
Mark Wolery ◽  
Patricia Munson Doyle

1990 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Alig Cybriwsky ◽  
John W. Schuster

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document